Efficacy of different drug classes used to initiate antihypertensive drug treatment in black subjets. Results from a randomized trial in Johannesburg, South Africa

BACKGROUND: Thiazides are recommended to initiate antihypertensive drug treatment in black subjects. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of this recommendation in a South African black cohort. METHODS: Men and women (N = 409), aged 18 to 70 years, with a mean ambulatory daytime diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 114 mm Hg, were randomized to 13 months of open-label treatment starting with the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (30 mg/d, n = 233), sustained-release verapamil hydrochloride (240 mg/d, n = 58), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg/d, n = 58), or enalapril maleate (10 mg/d, n = 60). If the target of reducing daytime diastolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg was not attained, the first-line drugs were titrated up and after 2 months other medications were added to the regimen. RESULTS: While receiving monotherapy (2 months, n = 366), the patients' systolic and diastolic decreases in daytime blood pressure averaged 22/14 mm Hg for nifedipine, 17/11 mm Hg for verapamil, 12/8 mm Hg for hydrochlorothiazide, and 5/3 mm Hg for enalapril. At 2 months the blood pressure of more patients treated with nifedipine was controlled: 133 (63.3%, P</=.03) vs 20 (39.9%) receiving verapamil, 21 (40.4%) receiving hydrochlorothiazide, and 11 (20.8%) receiving enalapril. At 13 months (n = 257), more patients (P<.001) continued receiving monotherapy with nifedipine (94/154 [61.0%]) or verapamil (22/35 [62.9%]) than hydrochlorothiazide (10/39 [25.6%]) or enalapril (1/29 [3.4%]). A sustained decrease of left ventricular mass (P<.001) with no between-group differences was achieved at 4 and 13 months. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to current recommendations, calcium channel blockers are more effective than thiazides as initial treatment in black subjects with hypertension. If treatment is started with thiazides or converting-enzyme inhibitors, combination therapy is more likely to be required to control blood pressure and reduce left ventricular mass.status: publishe

Multiple valve disease

Multiple valvular heart disease is a highly prevalent condition. Whereas the burden of rheumatic heart disease is decreasing, degenerative etiologies are becoming increasingly prevalent in industrialized regions. Hemodynamic interactions may impact both the clinical expression and the diagnosis of each singular lesion, and the clinician should be aware of its specific diagnostic pitfalls. There is currently little if any evidence-based management strategy. Patients should be followed by a Heart Valve Team in the setting of heart valve clinics, using a “case by case” therapeutic strategy. In addition to the severity of each singular lesion, clinical and imaging factors should be considered, including the individual risk profile, the increased morbidity associated with multiple prostheses, and the natural history of each valvular lesion if left untreated. Advances in transcatheter valve therapies are likely to change the therapeutic paradigm, but these approaches still require prospective validation before gaining wide acceptance.SCOPUS: ch.binfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Pathophysiology and management of multivalvular disease

Multivalvular disease (MVD) is common among patients with valvular disease, and has a complex pathophysiology dependent on the specific combination of valve lesions. Diagnosis is challenging because several echocardiographic methods commonly used for the assessment of stenosis or regurgitation have been validated only in patients with single-valve disease. Decisions about the timing and type of treatment should be made by a multidisciplinary heart valve team, on a case-by-case basis. Several factors should be considered, including the severity and consequences of the MVD, the patient's life expectancy and comorbidities, the surgical risk associated with combined valve procedures, the long-term risk of morbidity and mortality associated with multiple valve prostheses, and the likelihood and risk of reoperation. The introduction of transcatheter valve therapies into clinical practice has provided new treatment options for patients with MVD, and decision-making algorithms on how to combine surgical and percutaneous treatment options are evolving rapidly. In this Review, we discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of MVD, focusing on the combinations of valve pathologies that are most often encountered in clinical practice.SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe