3 research outputs found

    Survival outcomes and interval between lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB in cutaneous melanoma- findings of a large prospective cohort study

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in cutaneous melanoma (CM) is performed to identify patient at risk of regional and distant relapse. We hypothesized that timing of lymphoscintigraphy may influence the accuracy of SLNB and patient outcomes. Methods: We reviewed prospective data on patients undergoing SLNB for CM at a large university cancer-center between 2008-2015, examining patient and tumor demographics and time between lymphoscintigraphy (LS) and SLNB. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed disease-specific (DSS) and overall-survival (OS), stratified by timing of LS. Cox multivariate regression analysis assessed independent risk factors for survival. Results: We identified 1015 patients. Median follow-up was 45 months (IQR 26-68 months). Univariate analysis showed a 6.8% absolute DSS (HR 1.6 [1.03-2.48], p= 0.04) benefit and a 10.7% absolute OS (HR 1.64 [1.13-2.38], p=0.01) benefit for patients whose SLNB was performed 12 hours (n=652). Multivariate analysis identified timing of LS as an independent predictor of OS (p=0.007) and DSS (p=0.016) when competing with age, sex, Breslow thickness (BT) and SLN status. No difference in nodal relapse rates (5.2% v 4.6%; p=0.67) was seen. Both groups were matched for age, sex, BT and SLN status. Conclusion: These data have significant implications for SLNB services, suggesting delaying SLNB >12 hours after LS using a Tc99-labelled nanocolloid has a significant negative survival impact for patients and should be avoided. We hypothesise that temporal tracer migration is the underlying cause and advocate further trials investigating alternative, 'stable' tracer-agents

    A feasibility study of indocyanine green fluorescence mapping for sentinel lymph node detection in cutaneous melanoma

    Get PDF
    Objectives: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is standard of care for staging regional LN in AJCC stage IB-IIC melanoma; using dual localization with radiolabelled colloid and blue dye. Combining these gives optimal accuracy; drawbacks include cumulative radiation exposure for healthcare workers, coordination between disciplines and anaphylaxis. An alternative tracer agent is indocyanine green (ICG); an optical enhancer that fluoresces in the near infrared range. This prospective cohort study assesses the feasibility of using ICG as a tracer agent to detect SLN in cutaneous melanoma. Methods: Primary melanoma patients diagnosed with pT1b-pT4b tumours undergoing SLNB were recruited over a 6-month period at a tertiary referral centre. All underwent standard preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) using 20-40MBq of Tc99radiolabelled nanocolloid plus intraoperative Patent Blue dye (PBD). ICG was administered as a third tracer agent intraoperatively. Results: 62 patients (33M/29F) were recruited; median age was 61 years. Median melanoma Breslow thickness was 1.6mm. 144 specimens containing 135 SLN were excised. Concordance rate for all 3 tracer agents was 88.1%(119/135 LN); that for radioisotope/PBD was 88.2%(95%CI:82.2,93.7). There were no discordance pairs between radioisotope/PBD compared to radioisotope/PBD/ICG. Radioisotope/ICG significantly increased the sensitivity of detecting SLN to 98.5%(95%CI:94.8,99.8); p<0.00001 compared to radioisotope/PBD. Concordance rate of intraoperative ICG drainage pattern with LSG was 22.6%. Conclusion: ICG utilization showed comparable sensitivity with gold standard. Technical challenges e.g. ICG leakage into biopsy field, poor concordance with LSG limits its efficacy in melanoma SLNB. We therefore do not recommend replacing current practice with ICG alone or by using a combination with TC99

    UK audit of relative lung function measurement from planar radionuclide imaging

    No full text
    Background: Quantitative measurements of regional lung ventilation and perfusion are useful adjuncts to image interpretation.Aim: This study investigated the accuracy and precision of the software used to carry out such measurements in the UK.Methods: Ten examples of perfusion distribution, representing the range of patterns expected in practice, were simulated on computer using a segmental model of the lung and real three-dimensional lung shapes obtained from magnetic resonance images. Pairs of anterior and posterior perfusion images were simulated and distributed to UK hospitals wishing to take part in the audit. Each centre returned analysis results and technical details. Forty centres provided data on the relative right : left lung perfusion. Thirteen also submitted data with each lung divided into three zones and four with each lung divided into two zones. All measurements were expressed by the percentage of total perfusion in a particular region. Errors were assessed as the root-mean-square (rms) deviation from the true value.Results: Methods varied in the view used for analysis (80% geometric mean, 20% posterior) and the use of background subtraction (71% not used, 29% used). The rms error for percentage right assessment was 1.5 percentage points. This increased on two- and three-zone analysis to 3.8 and 4.3 percentage points, respectively. Differences in technique made little difference to whole-lung relative perfusion errors, but were important in zonal analysis.Conclusions: Quantification of whole-lung relative function is accurate and reproducible. Zonal values are determined less accurately, but still provide a useful guide to the distribution of function
    corecore