ERCC1 and Ki67 in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Other Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung Distribution and Impact on Survival

BackgroundExcision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is a key component of the platinum-DNA repair mechanism. Ki67 is associated with the clinical course of several malignancies. The associations of ERCC1 and Ki67, clinical features and survival in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) were determined.Materials and MethodsWe included a consecutive series of 186 patients with SCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and surgically treated patients with TC (n = 48), AC (n = 15) and LCNEC (n = 27). ERCC1 and Ki 67 were measured by immunohistochemistry and scored using published criteria.ResultsThe expression of ERCC1 was different among the different tumor types (p < 0.001). For patient with limited disease as well as extensive disease SCLC, no association of ERCC1 expression with survival was observed (p = 0.59). However, only 10% of SCLC tumors expressed ERCC1. For TC and AC, ERCC1 positive patients had better survival than ERCC1 negative patients. ERCC1 had no prognostic impact for LCNEC. A difference of the percentage of Ki67 LI was observed for the different tumor types (p < 0.001). The difference between TC and AC was significant (p = 0.02), as was the difference between low grade (TC+AC) and high grade NE (LCNEC + SCLC) (p < 0.001). For all included patients, a correlation between Ki67 and ERCC1 was observed (RSquare = 0.19, p < 0.001).ConclusionERCC1 expression in SCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy has no impact on survival. High expression of ERCC1 in TC might represent a clue to the failure of platinum-based therapy in these patients. ERCC1 expression has prognostic impact in lung carcinoids. Ki 67 might be considered as a supplementary test to the histopatologic classification of NE tumors

Reclassification of neuroendocrine tumors improves the separation of carcinoids and the prediction of survival.

International audienceINTRODUCTION: The classification of neuroendocrine lung tumors has changed over the last decades. Reliable diagnoses are crucial for the quality of clinical databases. The purpose of this study is to determine to which extent the use of different diagnostic criteria of neuroendocrine lung tumors has influenced the classification of these tumors. The prognostic information of tumor, node, metastasis descriptors was also evaluated. METHODS: We retrieved 110 tumors from the period 1989 to 2007. All tumors were reclassified according to the World Health Organization classification of 2004. Tumor, node, metastasis descriptors were evaluated. RESULTS: By reclassification, the diagnoses on 48 tumors (44%) were changed. More diagnoses were changed in the older part of the material. A significantly different survival was shown for all patients in relation to tumor size (p < 0.0001). An endobronchial component was seen in 54%, 31%, and 11% of typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, respectively with no impact on survival (p = 0.90). For all included patients the survival was significantly worse for patients having metastasis to N1 nodes as compared with N0 (p = 0.03). However, the number of removed lymph nodes were insufficient for definitive determination of the prognostic impact of node metastases. Regarding the revised diagnoses, a significant difference in survival between typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma was noted (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Tumors must be rediagnosed before entering a central database. Tumor and node seem to be useful predictors of survival