A united statement of the global chiropractic research community against the pseudoscientific claim that chiropractic care boosts immunity.

BACKGROUND: In the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, the International Chiropractors Association (ICA) posted reports claiming that chiropractic care can impact the immune system. These claims clash with recommendations from the World Health Organization and World Federation of Chiropractic. We discuss the scientific validity of the claims made in these ICA reports. MAIN BODY: We reviewed the two reports posted by the ICA on their website on March 20 and March 28, 2020. We explored the method used to develop the claim that chiropractic adjustments impact the immune system and discuss the scientific merit of that claim. We provide a response to the ICA reports and explain why this claim lacks scientific credibility and is dangerous to the public. More than 150 researchers from 11 countries reviewed and endorsed our response. CONCLUSION: In their reports, the ICA provided no valid clinical scientific evidence that chiropractic care can impact the immune system. We call on regulatory authorities and professional leaders to take robust political and regulatory action against those claiming that chiropractic adjustments have a clinical impact on the immune system

New life for an old idea: Assessing tonic heat pain by means of participant controlled temperature

BACKGROUND Temporal changes of pain perception to prolonged tonic heat pain are conventionally assessed using a computerized visual analog scale. Such a rating-based approach is, however, prone to floor and ceiling effects, which limit the assessment of temporal changes in perception. Thus, alternative methods that overcome these shortcomings are warranted. NEW METHOD The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reliability of a psychophysical approach, i.e., participant-controlled temperature (PCT), to evaluate ongoing human perception of tonic heat pain. Fifty participants were presented with a 45 °C stimulus on the non-dominant hand, and were instructed to maintain their initial sensation for two minutes via a feedback controller in the dominant hand. A subset of participants (n = 17) performed PCT tonic heat protocols on two different days to determine the test-retest reliability. As participants controlled temperature to maintain a stable pain perception, any adjustments made reflected shifts in their perception of heat. RESULTS In 33 (71.7%) participants, we observed an initial adaptation (participant increased temperature) followed by temporal summation of pain (participant decreased temperature). Twelve participants (26.1%) showed only adaptation and one (2.2%) only temporal summation. No sex differences were observed, nor did the initial rating of pain have an effect on PCT outcomes. Temporal summation of pain showed moderate to substantial reliability upon retest. CONCLUSIONS PCT represents can be reliably performed using a contact heat stimulator to measure the temporal summation of pain. The standardized setup and overall good reliability of the outcome measures facilitate a sound implementation into the clinical work-up of patients with pain conditions

Normative data of contact heat evoked potentials from the lower extremities

Contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) have become an acknowledged research tool in the assessment of the integrity of the nociceptive system and gained importance in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected small fiber neuropathy. For the latter, normative values for CHEP amplitude and latency are indispensable for a clinically meaningful interpretation of the results gathered in patients. To this end, CHEPs were recorded in 100 healthy subjects over a wide age range (20-80 years) and from three different dermatomes of the lower extremities (L2, L5, and S2). A normal baseline (35-52 °C) and increased baseline stimulation (42-52 °C) were applied. Statistical analysis revealed significant effects of stimulation site, stimulation intensity, and sex on CHEP parameters (N2 latency, N2P2 amplitude, and NRS). Significant positive correlations of body height with N2 latency, and pain ratings with N2P2 amplitudes were observed. This is the first time that normative values have been obtained from multiple dermatomes of the lower extremities. The present dataset will facilitate the clinical application of CHEPs in the neurophysiological diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy and by discerning pathological findings help establish a proximal-distal gradient of nerve degeneration in polyneuropathies