Short-Term Effect of Intraocular Pressure Elevation on the Human Electroretinogram

In six human volunteers, serial electroretinograms (ERGs) were performed over five minutes at intraocular pressure artificially elevated with a suction cup. Compared to the base line ERG, there was no decrease in b-wave amplitude unless intraocular pressures approached or exceeded diastolic ophthalmic artery pressure, as determined by suction cup ophthalmodynamometry. Although reduced severely, the b-wave was not completely obliterated within five minutes, even at intraocular pressures above the mean ophthalmic artery pressure and in some cases above systolic artery pressure

Strategy for the management of complex retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 2

Objective: To study the outcome of the treatment of complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs).Design: Nonrandomized, multicenter, retrospective study.Participants: One hundred seventy-six surgeons from 48 countries spanning 5 continents reported primary procedures for 7678 RRDs.Methods: Reported data included clinical manifestations, the method of repair, and the outcome.Main outcome measures: Failure of retinal detachment repair (level 1 failure rate), remaining silicone oil at the study's conclusion (level 2 failure rate), and need for additional procedures to repair the detachments (level 3 failure rate).Results: The main categories of complex retinal detachments evaluated in this investigation were: (1) grade B proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR; n = 917), (2) grade C-1 PVR (n = 637), (3) choroidal detachment or significant hypotony (n = 578), (4) large or giant retinal tears (n = 1167), and (5) macular holes (n = 153). In grade B PVR, the level 1 failure rate was higher when treated with a scleral buckle alone versus vitrectomy (P = 0.0017). In grade C-1 PVR, there was no statistically significant difference in the level 1 failure rate between those treated with vitrectomy, with or without scleral buckle, and those treated with scleral buckle alone (P = 0.7). Vitrectomy with a supplemental buckle had an increased failure rate compared with those who did not receive a buckle (P = 0.007). There was no statistically significant difference in level 1 failure rate between tamponade with gas versus silicone oil in patients with grade B or C-1 PVR. Cases with choroidal detachment or hypotony treated with vitrectomy had a significantly lower failure rate versus treatment with scleral buckle alone (P = 0.0015). Large or giant retinal tears treated with vitrectomy also had a significantly lower failure rate versus treatment with scleral buckle (P = 7×10(-8)).Conclusions: In patients with retinal detachment, when choroidal detachment, hypotony, a large tear, or a giant tear is present, vitrectomy is the procedure of choice. In retinal detachments with PVR, tamponade with either gas or silicone oil can be considered. If a vitrectomy is to be performed, these data suggest that a supplemental buckle may not be helpful.Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Ocular injuries from paintball pellets

Objective: To evaluate the ocular effects of blunt trauma due to injury from a paintball pellet. Design: Noncomparative case series. Participants: Thirteen patients who suffered ocular injury from paintballs are described. The patients presented to six different civilian and military emergency departments in tertiary care medical centers. Intervention: Patients were treated for the ocular injury. Main Outcome Measures: Patients were evaluated for initial and final visual acuity. The reason for persistent loss of vision was delineated. Results: There were 12 males and I female with an average age of 21 years (range, 12-33 years). Eleven of the 13 had no ocular protection at the time of the ocular injury. On initial examination, nine patients had a hyphema, nine had a vitreous hemorrhage, six had a retinal tear or detachment, three had corneal or corneal-scleral ruptures, and one had traumatic optic neuropathy. The final visual acuity was 20/40 or better in two patients, 20/50 to 20/150 in three patients, and 20/200 or worse in eight patients. Conclusion: Injuries due to paintball pellets can result in severe ocular damage and significant loss of vision. Eyecare professionals should be aware of the risks of this sport and must strongly advise participants to wear adequate protection when involved in this activity

Aspirin Effects on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report 14

Objectives.—This report presents information on the effects of aspirin on mortality, the occurrence of cardiovascular events, and the incidence of kidney disease in the patients enrolled in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS).Study Design.—This multicenter, randomized clinical trial of aspirin vs placebo was sponsored by the National Eye Institute.Patients.—Patients (N=3711) were enrolled in 22 clinical centers between April 1980 and July 1985. Men and women between the ages of 18 and 70 years with a clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were eligible. Approximately 30% of all patients were considered to have type I diabetes mellitus, 31% type II, and in 39% type I or II could not be determined definitely.Intervention.—Patients were randomly assigned to aspirin or placebo (two 325-mg tablets once per day).Main Outcome Measures.—Mortality from all causes was specified as the primary outcome measure for assessing the systemic effects of aspirin. Other outcome variables included cause-specific mortality and cardiovascular events.Results.—The estimate of relative risk for total mortality for aspirin-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients for the entire study period was 0.91 (99% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.11). Larger differences were noted for the occurrence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction; the estimate of relative risk was 0.83 for the entire follow-up period (99% confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.04).Conclusions.—The effects of aspirin on any of the cardiovascular events considered in the ETDRS were not substantially different from the effects observed in other studies that included mainly nondiabetic persons. Furthermore, there was no evidence of harmful effects of aspirin. Aspirin has been recommended previously for persons at risk for cardiovascular disease. The ETDRS results support application of this recommendation to those persons with diabetes at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.(JAMA. 1992;268:1292-1300