Betting on quality indicators to improve inflammatory bowel disease surveillance outcome: All-in or one to pick?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a well-known increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).1 Therefore guidelines recommend meticulous endoscopic surveillance , aiming for a reduction in CRC-related death by detecting and treating lesions in a premalignant state. All guidelines currently suggest the use of chromo-endoscopy with targeted biopsies (ESGE and ECCO)2,3 or with random biopsies every 10 centimeter (SCENIC, ESGE and ECCO).2-4 Although several quality criteria have been defined for colorectal cancer screening programs, and for colonoscopy specifically 2 , there is still a need for validated quality indicators that should be met when performing an IBD surveillance endoscopy.status: publishe

Artificial Intelligence and its impact on quality improvement in upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its application in medicine has grown large interest. Within gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, the field of colonoscopy and polyp detection is the most investigated, however, upper GI follows the lead. Since endoscopy is performed by humans, it is inherently an imperfect procedure. Computer-aided diagnosis may improve its quality by helping prevent missing lesions and supporting optical diagnosis for those detected. An entire evolution in AI systems has been established in the last decades, resulting in optimization of the diagnostic performance with lower variability and matching or even outperformance of expert endoscopists. This shows a great potential for future quality improvement of endoscopy, given the outstanding diagnostic features of AI. With this narrative review we highlight the potential benefit of AI to improve overall quality in daily endoscopy and describe the most recent developments for characterization and diagnosis as well as the recent conditions for regulatory approval.status: Published onlin

COVID-19 and gastrointestinal endoscopy: What should be taken into account?

On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a subsequent impact on the entire world and health care system. Since the causing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 houses in the aerodigestive tract, activities in the gastrointestinal outpatient clinic and endoscopy unit should be limited to emergencies only. Health care professionals are faced with the need to perform endoscopic or endoluminal emergency procedures in patients with a confirmed positive or unknown COVID-19 status. With this report, we aim to provide recommendations and practical relevant information for gastroenterologists based on the limited amount of available data and local experience, to guarantee a high-quality patient care and adequate infection prevention in the gastroenterology clinic.status: publishe

Real-time unblinding for validation of a new CADe tool for colorectal polyp detection.

status: Published onlin

Reversal of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Fails to Facilitate the Management of Recalcitrant Hypocalcaemia Caused by Primary Hypoparathyroidism

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is thought to reduce calcium absorption from the gut. Here, we report the case of a patient with a RYGB, who developed primary hypoparathyroidism after a total thyroidectomy, leading to recalcitrant hypocalcaemia. Despite aggressive oral calcium and calcitriol supplementation, she remained hypocalcaemic and required intravenous (IV) calcium supplementation to control her symptoms, and to keep calcium serum levels within an acceptable range. Teriparatide treatment improved calcium levels marginally. This treatment, however, was poorly tolerated and ultimately stopped by the patient. As a last resort, reversal of RYGB was performed to improve calcium absorption from the gut. Unfortunately, IV calcium supplementation remained necessary. This case illustrates that the reversal of RYGB is not always a guarantee for success in managing recalcitrant hypocalcaemia.status: publishe

BSGIE survey on COVID-19 and gastrointestinal endoscopy in Belgium :results and recommendations

Background and aims: With the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic declining, activities in the gastrointestinal clinic are being recommenced after a period of stringent measures. Since a second COVID-19 wave is not entirely ruled out health care professionals might remain faced with the need to perform endoscopic procedures in patients with a confirmed positive or unknown COVID-19 status. With this report we aim to provide a practical relevant overview of preparation and protective measures for gastroenterologists based on the currently available guidelines and our local experience and results of a national Belgian survey, to guarantee a fast recall of an adequate infection prevention if COVID-19 reoccurs. Methods: From the 23rd of March 2020 and the 13th of May 2020 we performed a Pubmed, Embase and Medline search, resulting in 37 papers on COVID-19 and endoscopy. Additionally, we combined these data with data acquired from the national BSGIE survey amongst Belgian gastroenterologists. Results: Based on 72 completed surveys in both university and non-university hospitals, the results show (1) a dramatic (<20%) or substantial (<50%) decrease of normal daily endoscopy in 74% and 22% of the units respectively, (2) a difference in screening and protective measures between university and non-university hospitals. These findings were subsequently compared with the current guidelines. Conclusion: Based on new data from the BSGIE survey and current guidelines we tried to realistically represent the current COVID-19 trends in protective measures, screening and indications for endoscopy and to provide a practical overview as preparation for a possible second wave.SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Clinical consequences of computer-aided colorectal polyp detection

Peer reviewed: TrueBackground and aimRandomised trials show improved polyp detection with computer-aided detection (CADe), mostly of small lesions. However, operator and selection bias may affect CADe’s true benefit. Clinical outcomes of increased detection have not yet been fully elucidated.MethodsIn this multicentre trial, CADe combining convolutional and recurrent neural networks was used for polyp detection. Blinded endoscopists were monitored in real time by a second observer with CADe access. CADe detections prompted reinspection. Adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates were measured prestudy and poststudy. Histological assessments were done by independent histopathologists. The primary outcome compared polyp detection between endoscopists and CADe.ResultsIn 946 patients (51.9% male, mean age 64), a total of 2141 polyps were identified, including 989 adenomas. CADe was not superior to human polyp detection (sensitivity 94.6% vs 96.0%) but outperformed them when restricted to adenomas. Unblinding led to an additional yield of 86 true positive polyp detections (1.1% ADR increase per patient; 73.8% were &lt;5 mm). CADe also increased non-neoplastic polyp detection by an absolute value of 4.9% of the cases (1.8% increase of entire polyp load). Procedure time increased with 6.6±6.5 min (+42.6%). In 22/946 patients, the additional detection of adenomas changed surveillance intervals (2.3%), mostly by increasing the number of small adenomas beyond the cut-off.ConclusionEven if CADe appears to be slightly more sensitive than human endoscopists, the additional gain in ADR was minimal and follow-up intervals rarely changed. Additional inspection of non-neoplastic lesions was increased, adding to the inspection and/or polypectomy workload.</jats:sec

Personal Protection and Delivery of Rhinologic and Endoscopic Skull Base Procedures During the COVID-19 Outbreak

On March 11th 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 pandemic, with subsequent profound impact on the entire health care system. During the COVID-19 outbreak, activities in the rhinology outpatient clinic and operation rooms are limited to emergency care only. Health care practitioners are faced with the need to perform rhinological and skull base emergency procedures in patients with a positive or unknown COVID-19 status. This article aims to provide recommendations and relevant information for rhinologists, based on the limited amount of (anecdotal) data, to guarantee high-quality patient care and adequate levels of infection prevention in the rhinology clinic