Supplementary Material for: Hypomagnesemia in Hemodialysis Patients: Role of Proton Pump Inhibitors

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Recent observations have associated hypomagnesemia with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We did a 3-month chart review of 62 chronic hemodialysis patients at a single US hospital. All were dialyzed using a dialysate [Mg] of 0.75-1.0 mEq/l. Patients were divided into two groups: hypomagnesemic (mean predialysis plasma [Mg] <1.5 mEq/l) and non-hypomagnesemic (mean predialysis plasma [Mg] ≥1.5 mEq/l). <b><i>Results:</i></b> All patients were male; mean age was 64.3 ± 8.7 years and the majority (73%) diabetic. 24 patients (39%) had hypomagnesemia and 38 (61%) were not hypomagnesemic. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, diabetes status, blood pressure, duration of dialysis, plasma calcium, phosphorus, albumin, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), dialysis adequacy (Kt/V), or dietary protein intake (as estimated by normalized protein catabolic rate, nPCR). However, use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) was significantly associated with hypomagnesemia (plasma [Mg] 1.48 ± 0.16 mEq/l in the PPI group vs. 1.65 ± 0.26 mEq/l in the non-PPI group, p = 0.007). Adjustment for age, diabetes status, duration of dialysis, plasma albumin, Kt/V, nPCR, and diuretic use did not affect the association between PPI use and hypomagnesemia. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Use of PPIs in patients dialyzed using a dialysate [Mg] of 0.75-1.0 mEq/l is associated with hypomagnesemia. We suggest monitoring plasma [Mg] in patients taking PPIs, with discontinuation of the medication if possible and/or adjustment of dialysate [Mg] to normalize plasma [Mg]

Supplementary Material for: A Comparative Study of Bronchoscopic Microsample Probe versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Patients with Burns-Related Inhalational Injury, Acute Lung Injury and Chronic Stable Lung Disease

<b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> The bronchoscopic microsample (BMS) probe allows direct epithelial lining fluid (ELF) level measurement without saline lavage. We investigated whether cytokine levels in ELF from a BMS differed from those obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in stable and acute lung disease. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a single-centre, prospective observational cohort study of 45 patients, a sequential BMS probe procedure and BAL were performed on patients with stable chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung disease, acute lung injury (ALI), burns-related inhalational injury or controls. ELF samples were assayed for IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and G-CSF. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Both bronchoscopic microsampling and BAL showed significantly higher cytokine levels in the ELF from patients with ALI and burns-related inhalational injury than from those with chronic stable lung disease. The BMS method detected cytokine levels approximately 20- to 80-fold higher than the corresponding BAL (uncorrected for dilution). The ratio of BMS and BAL cytokine levels was as follows: the ratio for IL-1β [mean 55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 34-88] was higher than that for IL-6 (mean 16, 95% CI 10-23, p = 0.015) and IL-8 (mean 13, 95% CI -5 to 36, p = 0.03). The ratio for G-CSF (mean 43, 95% CI 24-75) was higher than that for IL-6 (mean 16, 95% CI 10-23, p = 0.008). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The BMS probe safely collects ELF with higher equivalent inflammatory cytokine concentrations than via BAL from patients with both acute and chronic lung disease and can be an alternative to saline BAL. Variations in cytokine concentrations between BMS and BAL and sampling-site differences warrant further study

Supplementary Material for: Follow-Up for Resected Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Practice Survey of the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration (CommNETS) and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS)

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> There is no consensus regarding optimal follow-up in resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). We aimed to perform a practice survey to ascertain follow-up patterns by health care practitioners and highlight areas of variation that may benefit from further quantitative research. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A Web-based survey targeted at NET health care providers in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the USA was developed by a steering committee of medical oncologists and a research methodologist. Thirty-seven questions elicited information regarding adherence to guidelines, the influence of risk factors on follow-up, and the frequency and choice of modality in follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 163 respondents: 59 from Australia, 25 from New Zealand, 46 from Canada, and 33 from the USA (50% medical oncology, 23% surgery, 13% nuclear medicine, and 15% other). Thirty-eight percent of the respondents were “very familiar” with the NCCN NET guidelines, 33% with the ENETS guidelines, and 17% with the ESMO guidelines; however, only 15, 27, and 10%, respectively, found them “very useful”; 63% reported not using guidelines at their institution. The commonest investigations used were CT scans (66%) and chromogranin A (86%). The US respondents were more likely to follow patients up past 5 years, and the Australian respondents utilized more functional and less cross-sectional imaging. When poor prognostic factors were introduced, the respondents recommended more visits and tests. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This large international survey highlights variation in current follow-up practices not well addressed by the current guidelines. More quantitative research is required to inform the development of evidence-based guidelines tailored to the pattern of recurrence in NETs

Supplementary Material for: X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome: a spectrum of clinical and immunological profile and novel pathogenic variants from Chandigarh, India

Introduction: X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome (XLP) is a rare primary immune deficiency. Two types of XLP have been described: XLP-1 and XLP-2. Methods: We found 7 patients with XLP (3 had XLP-1 and 4 had XLP-2) after reviewing the data from Pediatric Immunodeficiency Clinic from 1997-2021. Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 3.8 years and mean delay in diagnosis was 2.6 years. Five patients had recurrent episodes of infections. Four patients developed at least one episode of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) (2 with XLP-1 and 2 with XLP-2). Of these, 2 had recurrent HLH (both with XLP-2). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection was detected in 2 (1 with XLP-1 and 1 with XLP-2). Both these patients had HLH. One child with XLP-2 had inflammatory bowel disease. Hypogammaglobulinemia was seen in 3 (2 with XLP-1 and 1 with XLP-2). Genetic analysis showed previously reported variants in 5, while 2 had novel variants (one in exon 7 of XIAP gene [c.1370dup p. Asn457Lysfs Ter16] and other had splice site variant in intron 1 of SH2D1A gene [c.138-2_138-1insG]). Episodes of HLH were managed with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), methylprednisolone, oral prednisolone, cyclosporine and rituximab. Inflammatory bowel disease was managed using oral prednisolone and azathioprine. One patient underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). One child with XLP-2 and WAS died because of fulminant pneumonia. Discussion/Conclusions: XLP should be considered as a strong possibility in any patient with features of HLH, repeated infections with hypogammaglobulinemia, persistent EBV infection and early onset IBD

Supplementary Material for: Everolimus in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Unknown Primary

<p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The RADIANT-4 randomized phase 3 study demonstrated significant prolongation of median progression-free survival (PFS) with everolimus compared to placebo (11.0 [95% CI 9.2-13.3] vs. 3.9 [95% CI 3.6-7.4] months) in patients with advanced, progressive, nonfunctional gastrointestinal (GI) and lung neuroendocrine tumors (NET). This analysis specifically evaluated NET patients with GI and unknown primary origin. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients in the RADIANT-4 trial were randomized 2:1 to everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo. The effect of everolimus on PFS was evaluated in patients with NET of the GI tract or unknown primary site. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 302 patients enrolled, 175 had GI NET (everolimus, 118; placebo, 57) and 36 had unknown primary (everolimus, 23; placebo, 13). In the GI subset, the median PFS by central review was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.2-17.3) in the everolimus arm versus 5.4 months (95% CI 3.6-9.3) in the placebo arm; the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.56 (95% CI 0.37-0.84). In the unknown primary patients, the median PFS was 13.6 months (95% CI 4.1-not evaluable) for everolimus versus 7.5 months (95% CI 1.9-18.5) for placebo; the HR was 0.60 (95% CI 0.24-1.51). Everolimus efficacy was also demonstrated in both midgut and non-midgut populations; a 40-46% reduction in the risk of progression or death was reported for patients in the combined GI and unknown primary subgroup. Everolimus had a benefit regardless of prior somatostatin analog therapy. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Everolimus showed a clinically meaningful PFS benefit in patients with advanced progressive nonfunctional NET of GI and unknown primary, consistent with the overall RADIANT-4 results, providing an effective new standard treatment option in this patient population and filling an unmet treatment need for these patients.</p