Analysis framework for focus group discussions with trial participants.

<p>Analysis framework for focus group discussions with trial participants.</p

Selection of trial staff and health providers for the in-depth interviews.

<p>Selection of trial staff and health providers for the in-depth interviews.</p

Characteristics of trial participants in the focus group discussions.

<p>Characteristics of trial participants in the focus group discussions.</p

Experiences and perceptions on the acceptability of IPTp-DP or IST-DP vs IPTp-SP among trial participants, trial staff and health providers.

<p>Experiences and perceptions on the acceptability of IPTp-DP or IST-DP vs IPTp-SP among trial participants, trial staff and health providers.</p

Health provider and trial staff characteristics.

<p>Health provider and trial staff characteristics.</p

Analysis framework for in-depth interviews with health providers and trial staff.

<p>Analysis framework for in-depth interviews with health providers and trial staff.</p

Quantitative comparison of PET-PCR assay and Rougemont real-time PCR assay.

<p>The PET-PCR and Rougemont real-time PCR assays were run using two well-quantified <i>P. falciparum</i> strains (Nigeria and Santa Lucia) used at six differing parasitemia levels (2000, 400, 80, 16, 3.2 and 0.64 parasites/µl). To determine the correlation between CT values and parasitemia, the mean CT values obtained in the PET-PCR assay (A) and in the Rougemont real time PCR assay (B) were plotted against the log transformed parasitemia (Log parasitemia). The CT values demonstrated reproducible linearity over the parasitemia range tested as both methods show significant correlation with R² values >0.990. No statistical difference in mean CT values was observed for the two different strains or for the two different methods (P>0.05).</p

MOESM1 of Effectiveness of the delivery of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in Kenya

Additional file 1: Table S1. Health facility performance for the delivery of IPTp with and without directly observed therapy (DOT) through the antenatal care platform. Table S2. Health facility performance for the delivery of ITN through the antenatal care platform at the time of the first visit

Drug Outlet & Simulation Algorithm.

<p>Drug Outlet & Simulation Algorithm.</p

Costing and sensitivity analysis of the Kenya public sector case management system.

<p>All costs are in 2012 USD.</p><p>Costing and sensitivity analysis of the Kenya public sector case management system.</p