Museus e comunicação pública : um estudo sobre os Tribunais Superiores no Brasil

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Expressão e Comunicação, Departamento de Comunicação, 2019.A presente dissertação se refere aos museus localizados nos cinco Tribunais Superiores do Judiciário no Brasil. São eles: Supremo Tribunal Federal, Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Superior Tribunal Militar, Tribunal Superior Eleitoral e Tribunal Superior do Trabalho. O objetivo da pesquisa foi compreender se os museus mencionados constituem-se como iniciativas de Comunicação Pública e de promoção do direito à informação. A problemática gira em torno do distanciamento entre os museus e a população, que foi constatado em pesquisa do Instituto Brasileiro de Museus (2012) e pôde também ser confirmado pelo baixo quantitativo de público informado pelos gestores dos museus estudados. A escolha pelo estudo dessas instituições se justifica porque museus desta tipologia, considerados institucionais, constituem mais de 50% do cenário museológico da capital federal. Investigar a dinâmica de divulgação e acesso a esses espaços públicos é uma necessidade a ser atendida. Para tanto, foi utilizado o referencial metodológico denominado Hermenêutica de Profundidade, de John B. Thompson (1995), cruzando interpretação documental, bibliográfica, entrevistas semiestruturadas e reinterpretação de dados. Foi possível constatar que os museus analisados não foram majoritariamente criados como resultado de uma estratégia de comunicação com o público externo, mas sim para atender a demandas institucionais. Nesse sentido, pela ótica teórica e normativa da Museologia e da Comunicação, foi possível concluir que os museus estudados apresentam dificuldades no cumprimento da função social que seria típica à sua natureza.This dissertation refers to the museums located in the five Superior Courts of the Judiciary in Brazil. They are: Supremo Tribunal Federal, Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Superior Tribunal Militar, Tribunal Superior Eleitoral e Tribunal Superior do Trabalho. Research‘s objective was to understand if the mentioned museums constitute as initiatives of Public Communication and promotion of the right to information. The problematic revolves around the distance between those museums and population, which was verified in a research developed by the Brazilian Institute of Museums (2012) and could be also confirmed by the low amount of public informed by the managers of those studied museums. The choice for studying of these institutions is justified by the fact that museums of this type, considered institutional, constitute more than 50% of the museological scene of the federal capital. Investigating the dynamics of disclosure and access to these public spaces is a need to be faced. For that, the methodological reference called Depth Hermeneutics, by John B. Thompson (1995), was used, crossing documentary, bibliographic interpretation, semi-structured interviews and reinterpretation of data. Following this way it was possible to verify that the analysed museums were not for the most part created as a result of a strategy of communication to the external public, but to face institutional demands. In a accordance to these permises, from the theoretical and normative point of view of Museology and Communication, it was possible to conclude that the museums studied presented difficulties in fulfilling the social function that would be typical of their nature

Estatuto de Museus, Comunicação e Museus de Tribunais Superiores do Judiciário no Brasil

This article sought to verify whether museums located in higher courts (STF, STJ, STM, TSE and TST) have been followed or not the guidelines established by the Statute of Museums, Law 11.904/2009, especially about communication matters. This research was guided in accordance to methodology of Depth Hermeneutics, initially developed by Thompson (1995). Using some articles of the Law as a parameter of analysis, it was possible to conclude that although in force for nine years, the Statute has not been effectively complied by the institutions linked to the Judiciary.Este artigo buscou verificar se museus localizados em tribunais superiores (STF, STJ, STM, TSE e TST) têm levado em conta ou não as diretrizes previstas pelo Estatuto de Museus, Lei 11.904/2009, principalmente no que se refere às atividades ligadas à comunicação. Para isso, a pesquisa utilizou a metodologia da Hermenêutica de Profundidade, desenvolvida inicialmente por Thompson (1995). Utilizando alguns artigos da lei como parâmetro de análise, foi possível, concluir que embora em vigor há nove anos, o Estatuto não tem sido efetivamente cumprido pelas próprias instituições ligadas ao Poder Judiciário

NEOTROPICAL ALIEN MAMMALS: a data set of occurrence and abundance of alien mammals in the Neotropics

Biological invasion is one of the main threats to native biodiversity. For a species to become invasive, it must be voluntarily or involuntarily introduced by humans into a nonnative habitat. Mammals were among first taxa to be introduced worldwide for game, meat, and labor, yet the number of species introduced in the Neotropics remains unknown. In this data set, we make available occurrence and abundance data on mammal species that (1) transposed a geographical barrier and (2) were voluntarily or involuntarily introduced by humans into the Neotropics. Our data set is composed of 73,738 historical and current georeferenced records on alien mammal species of which around 96% correspond to occurrence data on 77 species belonging to eight orders and 26 families. Data cover 26 continental countries in the Neotropics, ranging from Mexico and its frontier regions (southern Florida and coastal-central Florida in the southeast United States) to Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, and Uruguay, and the 13 countries of Caribbean islands. Our data set also includes neotropical species (e.g., Callithrix sp., Myocastor coypus, Nasua nasua) considered alien in particular areas of Neotropics. The most numerous species in terms of records are from Bos sp. (n = 37,782), Sus scrofa (n = 6,730), and Canis familiaris (n = 10,084); 17 species were represented by only one record (e.g., Syncerus caffer, Cervus timorensis, Cervus unicolor, Canis latrans). Primates have the highest number of species in the data set (n = 20 species), partly because of uncertainties regarding taxonomic identification of the genera Callithrix, which includes the species Callithrix aurita, Callithrix flaviceps, Callithrix geoffroyi, Callithrix jacchus, Callithrix kuhlii, Callithrix penicillata, and their hybrids. This unique data set will be a valuable source of information on invasion risk assessments, biodiversity redistribution and conservation-related research. There are no copyright restrictions. Please cite this data paper when using the data in publications. We also request that researchers and teachers inform us on how they are using the data