13 research outputs found
Favoring Eagerness for Remaining Items: Designing Efficient, Fair, and Strategyproof Mechanisms
In the assignment problem, the goal is to assign indivisible items to agents
who have ordinal preferences, efficiently and fairly, in a strategyproof
manner. In practice, first-choice maximality, i.e., assigning a maximal number
of agents their top items, is often identified as an important efficiency
criterion and measure of agents' satisfaction. In this paper, we propose a
natural and intuitive efficiency property,
favoring-eagerness-for-remaining-items (FERI), which requires that each item is
allocated to an agent who ranks it highest among remaining items, thereby
implying first-choice maximality. Using FERI as a heuristic, we design
mechanisms that satisfy ex-post or ex-ante variants of FERI together with
combinations of other desirable properties of efficiency (Pareto-efficiency),
fairness (strong equal treatment of equals and sd-weak-envy-freeness), and
strategyproofness (sd-weak-strategyproofness). We also explore the limits of
FERI mechanisms in providing stronger efficiency, fairness, or
strategyproofness guarantees through impossibility results
Fair Division through Information Withholding
Envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) is a well-studied fairness notion for
indivisible goods that addresses pairwise envy by the removal of at most one
good. In the worst case, each pair of agents might require the (hypothetical)
removal of a different good, resulting in a weak aggregate guarantee. We study
allocations that are nearly envy-free in aggregate, and define a novel fairness
notion based on information withholding. Under this notion, an agent can
withhold (or hide) some of the goods in its bundle and reveal the remaining
goods to the other agents. We observe that in practice, envy-freeness can be
achieved by withholding only a small number of goods overall. We show that
finding allocations that withhold an optimal number of goods is computationally
hard even for highly restricted classes of valuations. In contrast to the
worst-case results, our experiments on synthetic and real-world preference data
show that existing algorithms for finding EF1 allocations withhold
close-to-optimal number of goods.Comment: Full version of AAAI2020 paper. V2 has reviewers' comments
incorporated. V3 consists of updates to Section 7.
Hide, Not Seek: Perceived Fairness in Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods
Fair division provides a rich computational and mathematical framework for
the allocation of indivisible goods, which has given rise to numerous fairness
concepts and their relaxations. In recent years, much attention has been given
to theoretical and computational aspects of various fairness concepts.
Nonetheless, the choice of which fairness concept is in practice perceived to
be fairer by individuals is not well understood. We consider two conceptually
different relaxations of envy-freeness and investigate how individuals perceive
the induced allocations as fair. In particular, we examine a well-studied
relaxation of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) which is based on
counterfactual thinking that any pairwise envy can be eliminated by the
hypothetical removal of a single good from the envied agent's bundle. In
contrast, a recently proposed epistemic notion, namely envy-freeness up to
hidden goods (HEF-), provides a relaxation by hiding information about a
small subset of goods. Through various crowdsourcing experiments, we
empirically demonstrate that allocations achieved by withholding information
are perceived to be fairer compared to two variants of EF1.Comment: 21 pages, 10 figure
Multi-type Resource Allocation with Partial Preferences
We propose multi-type probabilistic serial (MPS) and multi-type random
priority (MRP) as extensions of the well known PS and RP mechanisms to the
multi-type resource allocation problem (MTRA) with partial preferences. In our
setting, there are multiple types of divisible items, and a group of agents who
have partial order preferences over bundles consisting of one item of each
type. We show that for the unrestricted domain of partial order preferences, no
mechanism satisfies both sd-efficiency and sd-envy-freeness. Notwithstanding
this impossibility result, our main message is positive: When agents'
preferences are represented by acyclic CP-nets, MPS satisfies sd-efficiency,
sd-envy-freeness, ordinal fairness, and upper invariance, while MRP satisfies
ex-post-efficiency, sd-strategy-proofness, and upper invariance, recovering the
properties of PS and RP
Mechanism Design for Multi-Type Housing Markets with Acceptable Bundles
We extend the Top-Trading-Cycles (TTC) mechanism to select strict core allocations for housing markets with multiple types of items, where each agent may be endowed and allocated with multiple items of each type. In doing so, we advance the state of the art in mechanism design for housing markets along two dimensions: First, our setting is more general than multi-type housing markets (Moulin 1995; Sikdar, Adali, and Xia 2017) and the setting of Fujita et al. (2015). Further, we introduce housing markets with acceptable bundles (HMABs) as a more general setting where each agent may have arbitrary sets of acceptable bundles. Second, our extension of TTC is strict core selecting under the weaker restriction on preferences of CMI-trees, which we introduce as a new domain restriction on preferences that generalizes commonly-studied languages in previous works