Results of the first recorded evaluation of a national gestational diabetes mellitus register: challenges in screening, registration, and follow-up for diabetes risk

OBJECTIVE:Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of type 2 diabetes. A register can be used to follow-up high risk women for early intervention to prevent progression to type 2 diabetes. We evaluate the performance of the world's first national gestational diabetes register. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:Observational study that used data linkage to merge: (1) pathology data from the Australian states of Victoria (VIC) and South Australia (SA); (2) birth records from the Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity (CCOPMM, VIC) and the South Australian Perinatal Statistics Collection (SAPSC, SA); (3) GDM and type 2 diabetes register data from the National Gestational Diabetes Register (NGDR). All pregnancies registered on CCOPMM and SAPSC for 2012 and 2013 were included-other data back to 2008 were used to support the analyses. Rates of screening for GDM, rates of registration on the NGDR, and rates of follow-up laboratory screening for type 2 diabetes are reported. RESULTS:Estimated GDM screening rates were 86% in SA and 97% in VIC. Rates of registration on the NGDR ranged from 73% in SA (2013) to 91% in VIC (2013). During the study period rates of screening at six weeks postpartum ranged from 43% in SA (2012) to 58% in VIC (2013). There was little evidence of recall letters resulting in screening 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:GDM Screening and NGDR registration was effective in Australia. Recall by mail-out to young mothers and their GP's for type 2 diabetes follow-up testing proved ineffective.Douglas I. R. Boyle, Vincent L. Versace, James A. Dunbar, Wendy Scheil, Edward Janus, Jeremy J. N. Oats, Timothy Skinner, Sophy Shih, Sharleen O'Reilly, Ken Sikaris, Liza Kelsall, Paddy A. Phillips, James D. Best, on behalf of MAGDA Study Grou

HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice

Objective: To evaluate HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes

B-type Natriuretic Peptides Strongly Predict Mortality in Patients Who Are Treated with Long-Term Dialysis

Background and objectives: Left ventricular abnormalities contribute to cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease and may be detected by measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in serum

Longitudinal assessment of thyroid function in pregnancy

Background: Trimester-specific reference intervals (RIs) for thyroid function tests are lacking for Beckman Dxl 800 analysers. We aimed to establish RIs for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4) and to track intraindividual changes in thyroid function throughout pregnancy. Methods: One hundred and thirty healthy women without antithyroid peroxidase antibodies were followed longitudinally. Thyroid function was determined at trimester-1 (T1): 9-13 weeks; trimester-2 (T2): 22-26 weeks; trimester-3 (T3): 35-39 weeks and postpartum (PP): 8-12 weeks. A subgroup (n 1/4 47) was used to track intraindividual changes using PP as non-pregnant state (baseline). Results: For trimesters 1-3, TSH (median (2.5th, 5th, 95th and 97.5th percentile)) was 0.77 (0.03, 0.05, 2.33, 3.05), 1.17 (0.42, 0.47, 2.71, 3.36) and 1.35 (0.34, 0.42, 2.65, 2.83) mIU/L, respectively. Free T4 (mean (95%CI)) was 10.7 (5.9-15.5), 8.1 (4.9-11.3), 7.8 (4.5-11.0) pmol/L, respectively. In T2 and T3, 36% and 41% of the fT4 values, respectively, fell below the non-pregnancy lower normal limit. In the subgroup assessed for longitudinal changes, of the women with baseline TSH 4 median, 71-75% remained at or below the corresponding median for trimesters 1-3. Of the women with baseline fT4 4 median, 69-81% also remained at or below the corresponding median for trimesters 1-3. High correlation was observed at different trimesters and baseline for TSH (Spearman's r: 0.593-0.846, P &lt; 0.001) and for fT4 (r: 0.480-0.739, P&lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Use of trimester-specific RIs would prevent misclassification of thyroid function during pregnancy. In the majority of women, TSH and fT4 tracked on the same side of the median distribution, from a non-pregnant baseline, throughout pregnancy.</p