3 research outputs found

    Ultrasmall Silica-Based Bismuth Gadolinium Nanoparticles for Dual Magnetic Resonance–Computed Tomography Image Guided Radiation Therapy

    No full text
    Selective killing of cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy tissues is the goal of clinical radiation therapy. This therapeutic ratio can be improved by image-guided radiation delivery and selective radiosensitization of cancer cells. Here, we have designed and tested a novel trimodal theranostic nanoparticle made of bismuth and gadolinium for on-site radiosensitization and image contrast enhancement to improve the efficacy and accuracy of radiation therapy. We demonstrate in vivo magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT) contrast enhancement, and tumor suppression with prolonged survival in a non-small cell lung carcinoma model during clinical radiation therapy. Histological studies show minimal off-target toxicities due to the nanoparticles or radiation. By mimicking existing clinical workflows, we show that the bismuth–gadolinium nanoparticles are highly compatible with current CT-guided radiation therapy and emerging MR-guided approaches. This study reports the first in vivo proof-of-principle for image-guided radiation therapy with a new class of theranostic nanoparticles

    Nanoparticle Mediated Tumor Vascular Disruption: A Novel Strategy in Radiation Therapy

    No full text
    More than 50% of all cancer patients receive radiation therapy. The clinical delivery of curative radiation dose is strictly restricted by the proximal healthy tissues. We propose a dual-targeting strategy using <i>vessel</i>-<i>targeted</i>-radiosensitizing gold nanoparticles and <i>conformal</i>-image guided radiation therapy to specifically amplify damage in the tumor neoendothelium. The resulting tumor vascular disruption substantially improved the therapeutic outcome and subsidized the radiation/nanoparticle toxicity, extending its utility to intransigent or nonresectable tumors that barely respond to standard therapies

    Passive versus Active Tumor Targeting Using RGD- and NGR-Modified Polymeric Nanomedicines

    No full text
    Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) and the (over-) expression of angiogenesis-related surface receptors are key features of tumor blood vessels. As a consequence, EPR-mediated passive and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) and Asn-Gly-Arg (NGR) based active tumor targeting have received considerable attention in the last couple of years. Using several different in vivo and ex vivo optical imaging techniques, we here visualized and quantified the benefit of RGD- and NGR-based vascular vs EPR-mediated passive tumor targeting. This was done using ∼10 nm sized polymeric nanocarriers, which were either labeled with DY-676 (peptide-modified polymers) or with DY-750 (peptide-free polymers). Upon coinjection into mice bearing both highly leaky CT26 and poorly leaky BxPC3 tumors, it was found that vascular targeting did work, resulting in rapid and efficient early binding to tumor blood vessels, but that over time, passive targeting was significantly more efficient, leading to higher overall levels and to more efficient retention within tumors. Although this situation might be different for larger carrier materials, these insights indicate that caution should be taken not to overestimate the potential of active over passive tumor targeting
    corecore