10 research outputs found

    MOESM1 of Lignocellulose binding of a Cel5A-RtCBM11 chimera with enhanced β-glucanase activity monitored by electron paramagnetic resonance

    No full text
    Additional file 1: Figure S1. Smoothed far ultraviolet circular dichroism spectra of the BsCel5A-CBM3 (black line) and BsCel5A-CBM11 (red line). The insert presents the percentage of secondary structure elements in both proteins as estimated by deconvolution using the ContinII software [33]. See the relevant section in “Materials and Methods” for further experimental details

    Time-course analysis of the reaction products formed by Bglhi and mutants against cellobiose.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Bglhi, (b) N89Y/H307Y, (c) H307Y, (d) D237V/P389H/E395G/K475R, (e) D237V, (f) A141T/N235S, (g) N235S. The reactions were performed at 90–95% saturating concentrations of cellobiose (see legend to <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0188254#pone.0188254.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a>) in the absence (indicated as “control”) or presence of glucose (indicated as “Plus G<sub>1</sub>”) or xylose (indicated as “Plus X<sub>1</sub>”). The final concentrations of each monosaccharide were equal to MC<sub>max</sub> (Bglhi, N89Y/H307Y and H307Y) or MT (D237V/P389H/E395G/K475R, D237V, A141T/N235S and N235S). The reaction times were 0 (lanes t<sub>0</sub>), 5 min (lanes t<sub>1</sub>), 10 min (lanes t<sub>2</sub>) and 24 h (lanes t<sub>3</sub>). Standards: G<sub>1</sub>, glucose; G<sub>2</sub>, cellobiose; G<sub>3</sub>, cellotriose; G<sub>4</sub>, cellotetraose; Ge, gentibiose; X<sub>1</sub>, xylose; X<sub>2</sub>, xylobiose; SG<sub>2</sub>, equimolar mixture of sophorose and cellobiose. The volumes of each aliquot applied to the TLC plates were adjusted aiming the best visualization of the products.</p

    Catalytic reaction mechanism of the retaining β-glycosidases.

    No full text
    <p>After the formation of the glucosyl-enzyme intermediate (step 1), the entry of a water molecule leads to hydrolysis (step 2) and the entry of a sugar leads to transglycosylation (step 3).</p

    Engineering the GH1 β-glucosidase from <i>Humicola insolens</i>: Insights on the stimulation of activity by glucose and xylose - Fig 6

    No full text
    <p><b>Tandem mass spectrometry analysis of glucopyranosyl-xylose (A), cellotriose (B) and cellotetraose (C).</b> The sodium adducts of glucopyranosyl-xylose (<i>m/z</i> 335), cellotriose (<i>m/z</i> 527) and cellotetraose (<i>m/z</i> 689) were analyzed by MS/MS and the proposed interpretation of mass spectra are indicated on the structures.</p

    Effect of increasing concentrations of cellobiose and xylose on the cellobiase activity.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Bglhi, (b) N89Y/H307Y, (c) H307Y, (d) D237V/P389H/E395G/K475R, (e) D237V, (f) A141T/N235S, (g) N235S. <b>(A)</b> Effect of increasing concentrations of cellobiose on the cellobiase activity, in the absence (black lines and dots) or in the presence of fixed concentrations of xylose (blue lines and dots). The fixed concentrations of xylose were equal to MC<sub>max</sub> (Bglhi, N89Y/H307Y and H307Y) or MT (D237V/P389H/E395G/K475R, D237V, A141T/N235S and N235S). <b>(B and C)</b> Effect of increasing concentrations of xylose on the cellobiase activity of each enzyme at 90–95% saturating concentrations of cellobiose (5 mM for Bglhi, 40 mM for N89Y/H307Y, 70 mM for H307Y and D237V, 10 mM for D237V/P389H/E395G/K475R, 2 mM for A141T/N235S and 1 mM for N235S). The red asterisks (*) in Fig C indicate the MT concentrations. The experiments were repeated three times using three separate pure enzyme preparations. Each point represents the mean of duplicate assays ± SD (note that the error bars are not visible, as they lie within the area of the symbol).</p
    corecore