Factors influencing cosmetic results after breast conserving management (Turkish experience)

We aimed to determine predictive factors affecting cosmetic results after breast conserving management in breast cancer. Data on 96 patients with 97 breast cancer cases, who had been admitted to Uludag University M.A. Radiotherapy Center between October 1995 and December 1998 and managed with breast-conserving treatment, were analysed to determine the factors affecting cosmetic outcome, Possible factors affecting cosmesis were grouped as patient-related. tumor-related and treatment-related. Mann-Whitney U test was used in univariate analyses whereas logistic regression was used in multivariate analyses. Median follow-up time was 29.5 months ranging between 11 and 53 months and median age at admission was 50 (range 22-84). Cosmetic results were grouped in five categories; excellent; good; fair; poor and, very poor, using criteria, such as presence of fibrosis, telangiectasia. shape of breast, asymmetry, status of areola, pigmentation. Treated breasts were scored by the patients. three radiation oncologists and a breast surgeon independently. In the analysis performed using scores given by the patients, cases with scores 3 and above (unsatisfactory) were compared with cases with scores below 3 (satisfactory). Eighty-two patients (84%) considered cosmetic result as satisfactory (excellent/good) whereas 15 patients (16%) considered unsatisfactory (fair/poor/very poor). In univariate analysis using Mann Whitney U test, type of surgery (P = 0.0655) was the statistically significant factors affecting cosmetic results. In multivariate analysis using logistic regression, tumor quadrant (P = 0.0060) and elapsed radiation therapy days (P = 0.0090) were the most significant factors. Median values were taken into consideration for the scores given by the physicians and cases with scores 3 and above (unsatisfactory) were compared with cases with scores below 3 (satisfactory). Eighty-two cases were evaluated as satisfactory (84%) whereas 15 cases were unsatisfactory (16%). In this set of data, patient age (P=0.0144), menopausal status (P=0.0111), institution which surgery was performed (P=0.0045), type of surgery (P = 0,0044), placement of metallic clips (P = 0.0083) and skin fibrosis (P = 0.038) were found to be significant in univariate analysis using Mann-Whitney U test. In multivariate analysis using logistic regression, institution where surgery took place (P=0.0015), menopausal status (P=0.0087) and telangiectasia (P=0.0657) were the most significant factors

Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) expression in synovial sarcomas as a promising indicator of prognosis

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a type of soft-tissue sarcoma, often linked to poor survival. Although overexpression of enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) has been associated with poor prognosis in different tumors, a few studies investigated this link in SS. Here, we analyzed the relationship between EZH2 expression and prognostic factors in SS. We included 29 patients with SS. Immunostaining of EZH2 was performed with (D2C9) XPTM Rabbit mAb antibody, and the results were classified as low EZH2 expression (negative or weak expression) and high EZH2 expression category (moderate or strong expression). Analysis of survival in relation to prognostic factors was performed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Our sample included 19/29 female and 10/29 male patients, with age range 16-63 years. The tumor diameter ranged from 2 to 15 cm. Necrosis was observed in 15/29 cases. Sixteen cases had >10 mitoses per 50 high-power fields (HPFs). Out of 29 cases, 14 showed low and 15 had high EZH2 expression. Statistically significant results were obtained for the association between the presence of metastasis and necrosis (p = 0.042), high EZH2 expression and distant metastasis (p = 0.018), high EZH2 expression and necrosis (p = 0.016), and high EZH2 expression and the tumor size >5 cm versus tumor size ≤5 cm (p = 0.014). Patients with all of the following: the tumor size ≤5 cm, low EZH2 expression, and without necrosis and distant metastasis had significantly longer survival time. Our results are consistent with previous studies, suggesting that EZH2 overexpression is an indicator of poor prognosis in SS

A Multicenter Study of Genotype Variation/Demographic Patterns in 2475 Individuals Including 1444 Cases With Breast Cancer in Turkey

Objective: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer type in women and may be inherited, mostly in an autosomal dominant pattern. The clinical diagnosis of BC relies on the published diagnostic criteria, and analysis of two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are strongly associated with BC, are included in these criteria. The aim of this study was to compare BC index cases with non-BC individuals in terms of genotype and diagnostic features to investigate the genotype/demographic information association. Materials and Methods: Mutational analyses for the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes was performed in 2475 individuals between 2013-2022 from collaborative centers across Turkey, of whom 1444 with BC were designated as index cases. Results: Overall, mutations were identified in 17% (421/2475), while the percentage of mutation carriers in cases of BC was similar, 16.6% (239/1444). BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations were detected in 17.8% (131/737) of familial cases and 12% (78/549) of sporadic cases. Mutations in BRCA1 were found in 4.9%, whereas 12% were in BRCA2 (p<0.05). Meta-analyses were performed to compare these results with other studies of Mediterranean-region populations. Conclusion: Patients with BRCA2 mutations were significantly more common than those with BRCA1 mutations. In sporadic cases, there was a lower proportion with BRCA1/BRCA2 variants, as expected, and these results were consistent with the data of Mediterranean-region populations. However, the present study, because of the large sample size, revealed more robust findings than previous studies. These findings may be helpful in facilitating the clinical management of BC for both familial and non-familial cases