Correlation coefficients between the biomass of the PLFA groups and soil properties.

<p>^a TOC: total organic carbon; C/N: carbon nitrogen ratio; TN: total nitrogen; TP: total phosphorus; TK: total potassium; NH₄⁺: ammonium content; NO₃⁻: nitrate content; AP: available phosphorus; AK: available potassium.</p><p>^{b *} and **denote significant differences at <i>p</i> < 0.05 and <i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively.</p><p>Correlation coefficients between the biomass of the PLFA groups and soil properties.</p

Correlation coefficients between the biomass of the PLFA groups and soil enzyme activities.

<p>a * and **denote significant differences at <i>p</i> < 0.05 and <i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively.</p><p>Correlation coefficients between the biomass of the PLFA groups and soil enzyme activities.</p

Soil enzyme activities from different plantations.

<p>^a SS: pure <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> plantation; SY: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Pinus tabulaeformis</i>; SB: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Platycladus orientalis</i>; SC: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Robinia pseucdoacacia</i>.</p><p>^b Different letters within columns indicate significant differences at <i>p</i> < 0.05 levels through the LSD test.</p><p>^c Standard deviation.</p><p>Soil enzyme activities from different plantations.</p

Soil microbial community structure based on indicator lipids (n·mol g⁻¹ soil) from the four sites.

<p>Soil microbial community structure based on indicator lipids (nmol g⁻¹ soil) from the four sites</p><p>^a SS: pure <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> plantation; SY: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Pinus tabulaeformis</i>; SB: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Platycladus orientalis</i>; SC: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Robinia pseucdoacacia</i>.</p><p>^b Total lipid was the sum of the 31 detected fatty acids.</p><p>^c The values were the means of three replicates. Different letters within columns indicate significant differences at <i>p</i> < 0.05 levels through the LSD test.</p><p>^d G⁺ and G⁻ represent gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, respectively. G⁺/G⁻ was the ratio of the sum of gram-positive bacteria to the sum of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>^e Standard deviation.</p><p>Soil microbial community structure based on indicator lipids (n·mol g⁻¹ soil) from the four sites.</p

PCA of fatty acids from different plantations models.

<p>SS: pure <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> plantation; SY: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Pinus tabulaeformis</i>; SB: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Platycladus orientalis</i>; SC: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Robinia pseucdoacacia</i>.</p

Soil chemical characteristics in different plantations.

<p>^a SS: pure <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> plantation; SY: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Pinus tabulaeformis</i>; SB: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Platycladus orientalis</i>; SC: mixed plantation with <i>Hippophae rhamnoides</i> and <i>Robinia pseucdoacacia</i>.</p><p>^b Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences at <i>p</i> < 0.05 levels via the LSD test.</p><p>^c Standard deviation.</p><p>Soil chemical characteristics in different plantations.</p

Additional file 1 of Genetic and phenotypic analysis of 225 Chinese children with developmental delay and/or intellectual disability using whole-exome sequencing

Supplementary Material

Backyard poultry^* raising among 1,053 households in Xiuning County, China, 2007.

<p>*Including chicken, ducks, geese and other domestic birds.</p>†<p>Denominators smaller than the complete sample were indicated.</p

Frequency of live poultry market visits among 2,058 residents in Shenzhen, China, 2007.

<p>*Standardized number of visiting per unit time: 1 was attributed to reporting ≤1 live poultry market visit per year; 4 to reporting 3–5 times/year; 8 to reporting 6–11 times/year; 24 to reporting 1–3 times/month; 52 to reporting 1–2 times/week; 208 to reporting 3–5 times/week; and 365 to those reporting ≥1/day annually.</p>§<p>The average annual household visits was weighted by age and sex based on the National Census in 2000.</p