The clinical effectiveness of REGEN-COV in SARS-CoV-2 infection with Omicron versus Delta variants

In vitro studies suggesting that REGEN-COV (casirivimab plus imdevimab monoclonal antibodies) had poor efficacy against Omicron-variant SARS-CoV-2 infection led to amendment of REGEN-COV's Emergency Use Authorization to recommend use only in regions without high Omicron prevalence. REGEN-COV's relative clinical effectiveness for Omicron is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of non-hospitalized adults who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction at the University of Miami Health System from July 19 -November 21, 2021 (Delta period) and December 6, 2021 -January 7, 2022 (Omicron period). Subjects were stratified be REGEN-COV receipt within 72h of test positivity and by time period of infection. We constructed multivariable logistic regression models to assess the differential association of REGEN-COV receipt with hospitalization within 30 days (primary outcome) and ED presentation; all models included three exposure terms (REGEN-COV receipt, Omicron vs Delta period, interaction of REGEN-COV with time period) and potential confounders (vaccination status, vaccine boosting, cancer diagnosis). Our cohort consisted of 2,083 adults in the Delta period (213 [10.2%] received REGEN-COV) and 4,201 in the Omicron period (156 [3.7%] received REGEN-COV). Hospitalization was less common during the Omicron period than during Delta (0.9% vs 1.7%, p = 0.78) and more common for patients receiving REGEN-COV than not (5.7% vs 0.9%, p<0.001). After adjustment, we found no differential association of REGEN-COV use during Omicron vs Delta with hospitalization within 30d (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for the interaction term: 2.31 [0.76-6.92], p = 0.13). Similarly, we found no differential association for hospitalization within 15d (2.45 [0.63-9.59], p = 0.20) or emergency department presentation within 30d (1.43 [0.57-3.51], p = 0.40) or within 15d (1.79 [0.65-4.82], p = 0.30). Within the limitations of this study's power to detect a difference, we identified no differential effectiveness of REGEN-COV in the context of Omicron vs Delta SARS-CoV-2 infection

Aseptic meningitis in adults and children: Diagnostic and management challenges

•Aseptic Meningitis have unknown etiologies in 81% of patients.•Currently available virological tools are underutilized.•The majority of patients undergo unnecessary cranial imaging and antibiotic therapy.•All patients had a good clinical outcome. Aseptic meningitis represents a common diagnostic and management dilemma to clinicians. To compare the clinical epidemiology, diagnostic evaluations, management, and outcomes between adults and children with aseptic meningitis. We conducted a retrospective study from January 2005 through September 2010 at 9 Memorial Hermann Hospitals in Houston, TX. Patients age≥2months who presented with community-acquired aseptic meningitis with a CSF white blood cell count >5cells/mm3 and a negative Gram stain and cultures were enrolled. Patients with a positive cryptococcal antigen, positive blood cultures, intracranial masses, brain abscesses, or encephalitis were excluded. A total of 509 patients were included; 404 were adults and 105 were children. Adults were most likely to be female, Caucasian, immunosuppressed, have meningeal symptoms (headache, nausea, stiff neck, photophobia) and have a higher CSF protein (P <0.05). In contrast, children were more likely to have respiratory symptoms, fever, and leukocytosis (P <0.05). In 410 (81%) patients, the etiologies remained unknown. Adults were more likely to be tested for and to have Herpes simplex virus and West Nile virus while children were more likely to be tested for and to have Enterovirus (P <0.001). The majority of patients were admitted (96.5%) with children receiving antibiotic therapy more frequently (P <0.001) and adults receiving more antiviral therapy (P=0.001). A total of 384 patients (75%) underwent head CT scans and 125 (25%) MRI scans; all were normal except for meningeal enhancement. All patients had a good clinical outcome at discharge. Aseptic meningitis in adults and children represent a management challenge as etiologies remained unknown for the majority of patients due to underutilization of currently available diagnostic techniques

2039. Evaluation Of Diagnostic Considerations In The Evaluation Of Hospital Acquired Pneumonia

Abstract Background Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), defined as pneumonia that occurs 48 hours or more after hospital admission, is considered a part of the health care-associated infections (HAIs). HAIs are one of the top ten causes of death in the United States. Correct diagnosis of HAIs is key to reducing its impact, however, the diagnosis of HAP is challenging because clinical findings are nonspecific and there is no combination of signs, symptoms, and laboratory or imaging results that can predict this diagnosis with a good sensitivity or specificity. This study aims to clarify the prioritization of clinical elements considered in the diagnosis of HAP by physicians at our center. Methods This is a cross-sectional study at a large, tertiary care academic center in Miami, Florida. The target population included hospitalists, internal medicine residents, critical care and infectious disease fellows. REDCap was used to administer the survey and collect data. A rank individual analysis was conducted to assess for the most significant diagnostic criteria overall. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was conducted to assess for significance of the individual diagnostic criteria. Results At the end of the survey period, 130 people responded (45.8% of sent surveys). Overall Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test of the systemic factors showed significant differences between the diagnostic criteria chosen. The presence of a new or worsening infiltrate on imaging was selected as most important. After that, fever, a positive respiratory culture, worsening hypoxia and new cough and shortness of breath were in the second tier of important criteria (Figure 1). The median number of factors needed to have HAP in the differential diagnosis and start empiric treatment was 3, while the needed number to secure the diagnosis of HAP was 4. In an immunocompromised patient, the median number of factors needed was 2 (Figure 2). Color red, represents selection 1 - meaning, the larger the tab, it means that specific factor was highly considered as the first factor in the diagnosis of HAP. Color green represents second most selected factor Color blue represents third most selected factor Upper box: median number of factors needed to secure the diagnosis of HAP Mid box: median number of factors needed to include HAP as the differential diagnosis in an immunocompromised patient Lower box: media number of factors needed to have HAP in the differential and start empirical treatment Conclusion In this study, we observed that the most highly considered criteria for the diagnosis of HAP are new or worsening infiltrate on imaging, new or worsening hypoxia, and respiratory cultures with growth of a classical respiratory pathogen. Most of these criteria are part of the IDSA guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of HAP. Future directions include developing a decision support tool for diagnosing HAP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

A survey of resident physicians' knowledge regarding urine testing and subsequent antimicrobial treatment

Asymptomatic bacteriuria is often treated with antimicrobials despite no benefit to patients, contributing to antimicrobial resistance and costs. Identifying knowledge deficits may improve physician training and antimicrobial stewardship efforts. We surveyed internal medicine and medicine–pediatrics resident physicians about their knowledge and attitudes regarding urine testing and subsequent management. We surveyed 280 resident physicians at Jackson Memorial Hospital/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and the University of Minnesota Medical School, using patient management questions based on clinical vignettes. Overall knowledge, assessed by calculating the percentage of correct answers, was assessed for correlation with demographic information, training, and experience. Of 100 responses (36% response rate), the mean percentage of correct answers was 48% (range for individual questions, 19%-85%). Experience and demographic factors demonstrated no association with overall knowledge. Training appeared to be associated with overall knowledge, with third-year residents having significantly higher percentages of correct answers compared with first-year residents (53% vs 40%; P = .03), but this was nonsignificant when adjusted for multiple comparisons (P = .18). Knowledge was significantly better for questions regarding surgical versus nonsurgical scenarios (63% vs 37%; P < .001), and for questions for which the correct answer was to start antimicrobials, versus withholding antimicrobials/limiting further testing (83% vs 39%; P < .001). Knowledge deficits may contribute to unnecessary detection and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria

Association of care by a non-medical intensive care unit provider team with outcomes of medically critically ill patients

Objective: To determine the association of boarding of critically ill medical patients on non-medical intensive care unit (ICU) provider teams with outcomes. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: ICUs in a tertiary academic medical center. Patients: Patients with medical critical illness. Interventions: None. Measurement and main results: We compared outcomes for critically ill medical patients admitted to a nonmedical specialty ICU team (April 1 - August 30, 2020) with those admitted to the medical ICU team (January 1, 2018 -March 31, 2020). The primary outcome was hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospital disposition for survivors. Our cohort consisted of 1241 patients admitted to the medical ICU team and 230 admitted to non-medical ICU teams. Unadjusted hospital mortality (medical ICU, 38.8% vs non-medical ICU, 42.2%, p = 0.33) and hospital LOS (7.4 vs 7.4 days, p = 0.96) were similar between teams. Among survivors, more non-medical ICU team patients were discharged home (72.6% vs 82.0%, p = 0.024). After multivariable adjustment, we found no difference in mortality, LOS, or home discharge between teams. However, among hospital survivors, admission to a nonmedical ICU team was associated with a longer LOS (regression coefficient [95% CI] for log-transformed hospital LOS: 0.23 [0.05,0.40], p = 0.022). Certain subgroups-patients aged 50-64 years (odds-ratio [95% CI]: 4.22 [1.84,9.65], p = 0.001), with <= 10 comorbidities (0-5: 2.78 (1.11,6.95], p = 0.029; 6-10: 6.61 [1.38,31.71], p = 0.018), without acute respiratory failure (1.97 [1.20,3.23], p = 0.008)-had higher mortality when admitted to non-medical ICU teams. Conclusions: We found no association between admission to non-medical ICU team and mortality for medically critically ill patients. However, survivors experienced longer hospital LOS when admitted to non-medical ICU teams. Middle-aged patients, those with low comorbidity burden, and those without respiratory failure had higher mortality when admitted to non-medical ICU teams. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc

Real world SARS-COV-2 vaccine effectiveness in a Miami academic institution

To assess the effectiveness of messenger RNA vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) in preventing emergency department (ED) presentations for acute respiratory illness. We conducted a retrospective study assessing adult presentations (age ≥ 18) to the University of Miami Hospital's ED from January 1st through August 25th, 2021, with a SARS-COV-2 PCR test and acute respiratory infection symptoms. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated using a test-negative design. Both univariable and multivariable (adjusted for age, gender, race, insurance status, imputed body mass index [BMI], vaccine type, week of presentation) regression analyses were conducted for the full cohort and subgroups. The cohort consisted of 13,203 ED presentations—3134 (23.7%) fully vaccinated and SARS-COV-2 negative, 108 (0.8%) fully vaccinated and SARS-COV-2 positive, 8817 (66.8%) unvaccinated and SARS-COV-2 negative, and 1144 (8.7%) unvaccinated and SARS-COV-2 positive. Unadjusted vaccination effectiveness was 73.4% (95% confidence interval: 67.5%,78.3%) and, after adjustment, 73.8% (66.2%,79.7%). The Moderna vaccine's effectiveness was numerically higher (unadjusted: 78.2% [68.8%, 84.7%]; adjusted: 78.0% [68.1%, 84.9%]) than the Pfizer vaccine's (unadjusted: 70.8% [62.9%, 76.9%]; adjusted: 73.9% [66.3%,79.8%]). We found a significant difference in adjusted vaccine effectiveness across categories was BMI (p < 0.001)—BMI <25: 66.3% (45.3%,79.2%); BMI 25–29: 71.3% (56.1%, 81.2%); BMI 30–34: 84.5% (71.7%, 91.5%); and BMI ≥35: 72.7% (50.5%, 84.9%). We demonstrated excellent real-world effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in preventing ED presentation for SARS-COV-2 in a diverse U.S. cohort. Notably, vaccine effectiveness improved with increasing BMI (until class 2 obesity)

Adjusted associations of time period, REGEN-COV, and the interaction with outcomes.

Adjusted associations of time period, REGEN-COV, and the interaction with outcomes.</p

Resident Physician Knowledge of Urine Testing and Treatment Over Four Years

We surveyed resident physicians at 2 academic medical centers regarding urinary testing and treatment as they progressed through training. Demographics and self-reported confidence were compared to overall knowledge using clinical vignette-based questions. Overall knowledge was 40% in 2011 and increased to 48%, 55%, and 63% in subsequent years (P<.001).Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:616-618