7 research outputs found
The adsorption of Cu<sup>2+</sup> in the root cell walls of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i> and <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i>.
<p>Mean value followed by different letter is statistically significant (ANOVA; Duncan multiple range test, p<0.05).</p
ABA contents in the leaves of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i> and <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i> seedlings with treatment with 0 or 50 μM CuSO<sub>4</sub>.
<p>Mean value followed by different letter is statistically significant (ANOVA; Duncan multiple range test, p<0.05).</p
The lower epidermis as shown by SEM.
<p>(<b>A</b>) Lower epidermis of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i>, (<b>B</b>) magnifying epidermal stoma of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i>, (<b>C</b>) lower epidermis of <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i>, and (<b>D</b>) magnifying epidermal stoma of <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i>.</p
Relationships between the shoot Cu concentration (A), root Cu concentration (B) and the ratio of the Cu concentration in shoots to that in roots of <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i> (C) and the leaf transpiration rate.
<p>Mean value followed by different letter is statistically significant (ANOVA; Duncan multiple range test, p<0.01).</p
Microstructure of the root cells of two plant species.
<p>(<b>A</b>) Paraffin cross section of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i>, (<b>B</b>) electron micrograph of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i> cross-section, (<b>C</b>) paraffin cross section of <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i>, and (<b>D</b>) electron micrograph of a cross section of <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i>.</p
Wax content in leaves and stomatal density of the leaf epidermis of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i> and <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i> seedlings.
<p>Mean value followed by different letter is statistically significant (ANOVA; Duncan multiple range test, p<0.05).</p><p>Wax content in leaves and stomatal density of the leaf epidermis of <i>O</i>. <i>glazioviana</i> and <i>E</i>. <i>haichowensis</i> seedlings.</p
Elucidation of the Molecular Determinants for Optimal Perfluorooctanesulfonate Adsorption Using a Combinatorial Nanoparticle Library Approach
Perfluorooctanesulfonate
(PFOS) persistently accumulates in the
environment and in humans, causing various toxicities. To determine
the key molecular determinants for optimal PFOS specificity and efficiency,
we designed and synthesized a combinatorial gold nanoparticle (GNP)
library consisting of 18 members with rationally diversified hydrophobic,
electrostatic, and fluorine–fluorine interaction components
for PFOS bindings. According to our findings, the electrostatic and
F–F interactions between PFOS and nanoparticles are complementary.
When F–F attractions are relatively weak, the electrostatic
interactions are dominant. As F–F interactions increase, the
electrostatic contributions are reduced to as low as 20%, demonstrating
that F–F binding may overpower even electrostatic interactions.
Furthermore, F–F interactions (28–79% binding efficiency)
are 2-fold stronger than regular hydrophobic interactions (15–39%
binding efficiency) for PFOS adsorption, explaining why these novel
PFOS-binding nanoparticles are superior to other conventional materials
based on either hydrophobic or electrostatic binding. The PFOS adsorption
by the optimized nanoparticles performs well in the presence of ionic
interferences and in environmental wastewater. This library mapping
approach can potentially be applied to recognition mechanism investigation
of other pollutants and facilitate the discovery of effective monitoring
probes and matrices for their removal