23 research outputs found

    Aerodynamic Lift Force of High-speed Maglev Train

    No full text

    Research on aerodynamic optimization of high-speed train's slipstream

    No full text
    Slipstream severely affects the safety of trackside workers and equipment. With use of profile superimposition method and vehicle modeling method, parametrization of the whole train is carried out. Then, a slipstream optimization study has been performed, taking components of slipstream in different directions at the standard heights, the drag coefficient of the whole train and the volume of the driving cab as the design objectives. For each design objective, one unique epsilon-TSVR surrogate model has been constructed. Six final Pareto sets have been obtained on the base of six groups of different fitness functions by using multi-objective particle swarm method. Results reveal that the volume of the driving cab keeps almost the same, compared to the original shape. The velocity components of train-induced wind at the positions 0.2 and 1.4 m above the top of the rail, and the drag coefficient of the train are reduced by 11.6%, 33.9%, 24.7%, 25.9% and 13.0% respectively. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the length of the streamline, the height of the train and the width of the train influence significantly on the aerodynamic performance, and the train with a tall and thin streamline will benefit in reducing the slipstream and aerodynamic drag

    Numerical Investigation on the Influence of the Streamlined Structures of the High-Speed Train's Nose on Aerodynamic Performances

    No full text
    The structural design of the streamlined shape is the basis for high-speed train aerodynamic design. With use of the delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES) method, the influence of four different structural types of the streamlined shape on aerodynamic performance and flow mechanism was investigated. These four designs were chosen elaborately, including a double-arch ellipsoid shape, a single-arch ellipsoid shape, a spindle shape with a front cowcatcher and a double-arch wide-flat shape. Two different running scenes, trains running in the open air or in crosswind conditions, were considered. Results reveal that when dealing with drag reduction of the whole train running in the open air, it needs to take into account how air resistance is distributed on both noses and then deal with them both rather than adjust only the head or the tail. An asymmetrical design is feasible with the head being a single-arch ellipsoid and the tail being a spindle with a front cowcatcher to achieve the minimum drag reduction. The single-arch ellipsoid design on both noses could aid in moderating the transverse amplitude of the side force on the tail resulting from the asymmetrical vortex structures in the flow field behind the tail. When crosswind is considered, the pressure distribution on the train surface becomes more disturbed, resulting in the increase of the side force and lift. The current study reveals that the double-arch wide-flat streamlined design helps to alleviate the side force and lift on both noses. The magnitude of side force on the head is 10 times as large as that on the tail while the lift on the head is slightly above that on the tail. Change of positions where flow separation takes place on the streamlined part is the main cause that leads to the opposite behaviors of pressure distribution on the head and on the tail. Under the influence of the ambient wind, flow separation occurs about distinct positions on the train surface and intricate vortices are generated at the leeward side, which add to the aerodynamic loads on the train in crosswind conditions. These results could help gain insight on choosing a most suitable streamlined shape under specific running conditions and acquiring a universal optimum nose shape as well

    Data-driven rapid prediction model for aerodynamic force of high-speed train with arbitrary streamlined head

    No full text
    Due to the complicated geometric shape, it's difficult to precisely obtain the aerodynamic force of high-speed trains. Taking numerical and experimental data as the training data, the present work proposed a data-driven rapid prediction model to solve this problem, which utilized the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model to construct a nonlinear implicit mapping between design variables and aerodynamic forces of high-speed train. Within this framework, it is a key issue to achieve the consistency and auto-extraction of design variables for any given streamlined shape. A general parameterization method for the streamlined shape which adopted the idea of step-by-step modeling has been proposed. Taking aerodynamic drag as the prediction objective, the effectiveness of the model was verified. The results show that the proposed model can be successfully used for performance evaluation of high-speed trains. Keeping a comparable prediction accuracy with numerical simulations, the efficiency of the rapid prediction model can be improved by more than 90%. With the enrichment of data for the training set, the prediction accuracy of the rapid prediction model can be continuously improved. Current study provides a new approach for aerodynamic evaluation of high-speed trains and can be beneficial to corresponding engineering design departments

    Grid diagram of the train head.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Longitudinal section of the train head; (b) Surface of the train head.</p

    Pareto solutions based on drag of the whole train and the lift of the train coach.

    No full text
    <p>Pareto solutions based on drag of the whole train and the lift of the train coach.</p

    Pressure distribution near the tail coach of the original shape and the optimal shape.

    No full text
    <p>Pressure distribution near the tail coach of the original shape and the optimal shape.</p

    Multi-objective optimization design process.

    No full text
    <p>Multi-objective optimization design process.</p

    Variation values of the parameters of the typical design points relative to the original shape (1:1).

    No full text
    <p>Variation values of the parameters of the typical design points relative to the original shape (1:1).</p
    corecore