4 research outputs found
An āIntermediate Spinā Nickel Hydride Complex Stemming from Delocalized Ni<sub>2</sub>(Ī¼-H)<sub>2</sub> Bonding
The nickel hydride
complex [Cpā²NiĀ(Ī¼-H)]<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>, Cpā²
= 1,2,3,4-tetraĀisopropylĀcycloĀpentaĀdienyl)
is found to have a strikingly short NiāNi distance of 2.28638(3)
Ć
. Variable temperature and field magnetic measurements indicate
an unexpected triplet ground state for <b>1</b> with a large
zero-field splitting of +90 K (63 cm<sup>ā1</sup>). Electronic
structure calculations (DFT and CASSCF/CASPT2) explain this ground
state as arising from half occupation of two nearly degenerate NiāNi
Ļ* orbitals
Covalent Attachment of Catalyst Molecules to Conductive Diamond: CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction Using āSmartā Electrodes
We report here covalent attachment of a catalytically
active cobalt
complex onto boron-doped, p-type conductive diamond. Peripheral acetylene
groups were appended on a cobalt porphyrin complex, and azideāalkyne
cycloaddition was used for covalent linking to a diamond surface decorated
with alkyl azides. The functionalized surface was characterized by
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier transform IR spectroscopy,
and the catalytic activity was characterized using cyclic voltammetry
and FTIR. The catalyst-modified diamond surfaces were used as āsmartā
electrodes exhibiting good stability and electrocatalytic activity
for electrochemical reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to CO in acetonitrile
solution
Electronic Structure of Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Complexes (E = S, Se, Te) and a Global Analysis of M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Compounds: A Case for Quantized E<sub>2</sub><sup><i>n</i>ā</sup> Oxidation Levels with <i>n</i> = 2, 3, or 4
The diamagnetic compounds
Cpā²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>:
E = S, <b>2</b>: E = Se, <b>3</b>: E = Te; Cpā²
= 1,2,3,4,-tetraisopropylcyclopentadienyl),
first reported by Sitzmann and co-workers in 2001 [Sitzmann, H.; Saurenz,
D.; Wolmershauser, G.; Klein, A.; Boese, R. <i>Organometallics</i> <b>2001</b>, 20, 700], have unusual EĀ·Ā·Ā·E distances,
leading to ambiguities in how to best describe their electronic structure.
Three limiting possibilities are considered: case <b>A</b>,
in which the compounds contain singly bonded E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā</sup> units; case <b>B</b>, in which a three-electron Eā“E
half-bond exists in a formal E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup> unit;
case <b>C</b>, in which two E<sup>2ā</sup> ions exist
with no formal EāE bond. One-electron reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields the new compounds [Cp*<sub>2</sub>Co]Ā[Cpā²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub>] (<b>1red</b>: E = S, <b>2red</b>: E = Se; Cp* = 1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadieyl).
Evidence from X-ray crystallography, X-ray absorption spectroscopy,
and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy suggest that reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> is Ni-centered. Density functional theory
(DFT) and ab initio multireference methods (CASSCF) have been used
to investigate the electronic structures of <b>1</b>ā<b>3</b> and indicate covalent bonding of an E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup> ligand with a mixed-valent Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,III) species. Thus,
reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,II) species <b>1red</b> and <b>2red</b> that bear
unchanged E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup> ligands. We provide strong
computational and experimental evidence, including results from a
large survey of data from the Cambridge Structural Database, indicating
that M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> compounds occur in quantized E<sub>2</sub> oxidation states of (2 Ć E<sup>2ā</sup>), E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup>, and E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā</sup>, rather than displaying a continuum of variable EāE bonding
interactions
Electronic Structure of Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Complexes (E = S, Se, Te) and a Global Analysis of M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Compounds: A Case for Quantized E<sub>2</sub><sup><i>n</i>ā</sup> Oxidation Levels with <i>n</i> = 2, 3, or 4
The diamagnetic compounds
Cpā²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>:
E = S, <b>2</b>: E = Se, <b>3</b>: E = Te; Cpā²
= 1,2,3,4,-tetraisopropylcyclopentadienyl),
first reported by Sitzmann and co-workers in 2001 [Sitzmann, H.; Saurenz,
D.; Wolmershauser, G.; Klein, A.; Boese, R. <i>Organometallics</i> <b>2001</b>, 20, 700], have unusual EĀ·Ā·Ā·E distances,
leading to ambiguities in how to best describe their electronic structure.
Three limiting possibilities are considered: case <b>A</b>,
in which the compounds contain singly bonded E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā</sup> units; case <b>B</b>, in which a three-electron Eā“E
half-bond exists in a formal E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup> unit;
case <b>C</b>, in which two E<sup>2ā</sup> ions exist
with no formal EāE bond. One-electron reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields the new compounds [Cp*<sub>2</sub>Co]Ā[Cpā²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub>] (<b>1red</b>: E = S, <b>2red</b>: E = Se; Cp* = 1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadieyl).
Evidence from X-ray crystallography, X-ray absorption spectroscopy,
and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy suggest that reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> is Ni-centered. Density functional theory
(DFT) and ab initio multireference methods (CASSCF) have been used
to investigate the electronic structures of <b>1</b>ā<b>3</b> and indicate covalent bonding of an E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup> ligand with a mixed-valent Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,III) species. Thus,
reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,II) species <b>1red</b> and <b>2red</b> that bear
unchanged E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup> ligands. We provide strong
computational and experimental evidence, including results from a
large survey of data from the Cambridge Structural Database, indicating
that M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> compounds occur in quantized E<sub>2</sub> oxidation states of (2 Ć E<sup>2ā</sup>), E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā</sup>, and E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā</sup>, rather than displaying a continuum of variable EāE bonding
interactions