4 research outputs found

    An ā€œIntermediate Spinā€ Nickel Hydride Complex Stemming from Delocalized Ni<sub>2</sub>(Ī¼-H)<sub>2</sub> Bonding

    No full text
    The nickel hydride complex [Cpā€²NiĀ­(Ī¼-H)]<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>, Cpā€² = 1,2,3,4-tetraĀ­isopropylĀ­cycloĀ­pentaĀ­dienyl) is found to have a strikingly short Niā€“Ni distance of 2.28638(3) ƅ. Variable temperature and field magnetic measurements indicate an unexpected triplet ground state for <b>1</b> with a large zero-field splitting of +90 K (63 cm<sup>ā€“1</sup>). Electronic structure calculations (DFT and CASSCF/CASPT2) explain this ground state as arising from half occupation of two nearly degenerate Niā€“Ni Ļ€* orbitals

    Covalent Attachment of Catalyst Molecules to Conductive Diamond: CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction Using ā€œSmartā€ Electrodes

    No full text
    We report here covalent attachment of a catalytically active cobalt complex onto boron-doped, p-type conductive diamond. Peripheral acetylene groups were appended on a cobalt porphyrin complex, and azideā€“alkyne cycloaddition was used for covalent linking to a diamond surface decorated with alkyl azides. The functionalized surface was characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier transform IR spectroscopy, and the catalytic activity was characterized using cyclic voltammetry and FTIR. The catalyst-modified diamond surfaces were used as ā€œsmartā€ electrodes exhibiting good stability and electrocatalytic activity for electrochemical reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to CO in acetonitrile solution

    Electronic Structure of Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Complexes (E = S, Se, Te) and a Global Analysis of M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Compounds: A Case for Quantized E<sub>2</sub><sup><i>n</i>ā€“</sup> Oxidation Levels with <i>n</i> = 2, 3, or 4

    No full text
    The diamagnetic compounds Cpā€²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>: E = S, <b>2</b>: E = Se, <b>3</b>: E = Te; Cpā€² = 1,2,3,4,-tetraisopropylcyclopentadienyl), first reported by Sitzmann and co-workers in 2001 [Sitzmann, H.; Saurenz, D.; Wolmershauser, G.; Klein, A.; Boese, R. <i>Organometallics</i> <b>2001</b>, 20, 700], have unusual EĀ·Ā·Ā·E distances, leading to ambiguities in how to best describe their electronic structure. Three limiting possibilities are considered: case <b>A</b>, in which the compounds contain singly bonded E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā€“</sup> units; case <b>B</b>, in which a three-electron Eāˆ“E half-bond exists in a formal E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup> unit; case <b>C</b>, in which two E<sup>2ā€“</sup> ions exist with no formal Eā€“E bond. One-electron reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields the new compounds [Cp*<sub>2</sub>Co]Ā­[Cpā€²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub>] (<b>1red</b>: E = S, <b>2red</b>: E = Se; Cp* = 1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadieyl). Evidence from X-ray crystallography, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy suggest that reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> is Ni-centered. Density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio multireference methods (CASSCF) have been used to investigate the electronic structures of <b>1</b>ā€“<b>3</b> and indicate covalent bonding of an E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup> ligand with a mixed-valent Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,III) species. Thus, reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,II) species <b>1red</b> and <b>2red</b> that bear unchanged E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup> ligands. We provide strong computational and experimental evidence, including results from a large survey of data from the Cambridge Structural Database, indicating that M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> compounds occur in quantized E<sub>2</sub> oxidation states of (2 Ɨ E<sup>2ā€“</sup>), E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup>, and E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā€“</sup>, rather than displaying a continuum of variable Eā€“E bonding interactions

    Electronic Structure of Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Complexes (E = S, Se, Te) and a Global Analysis of M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> Compounds: A Case for Quantized E<sub>2</sub><sup><i>n</i>ā€“</sup> Oxidation Levels with <i>n</i> = 2, 3, or 4

    No full text
    The diamagnetic compounds Cpā€²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>: E = S, <b>2</b>: E = Se, <b>3</b>: E = Te; Cpā€² = 1,2,3,4,-tetraisopropylcyclopentadienyl), first reported by Sitzmann and co-workers in 2001 [Sitzmann, H.; Saurenz, D.; Wolmershauser, G.; Klein, A.; Boese, R. <i>Organometallics</i> <b>2001</b>, 20, 700], have unusual EĀ·Ā·Ā·E distances, leading to ambiguities in how to best describe their electronic structure. Three limiting possibilities are considered: case <b>A</b>, in which the compounds contain singly bonded E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā€“</sup> units; case <b>B</b>, in which a three-electron Eāˆ“E half-bond exists in a formal E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup> unit; case <b>C</b>, in which two E<sup>2ā€“</sup> ions exist with no formal Eā€“E bond. One-electron reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields the new compounds [Cp*<sub>2</sub>Co]Ā­[Cpā€²<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub>] (<b>1red</b>: E = S, <b>2red</b>: E = Se; Cp* = 1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadieyl). Evidence from X-ray crystallography, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy suggest that reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> is Ni-centered. Density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio multireference methods (CASSCF) have been used to investigate the electronic structures of <b>1</b>ā€“<b>3</b> and indicate covalent bonding of an E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup> ligand with a mixed-valent Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,III) species. Thus, reduction of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> yields Ni<sub>2</sub>(II,II) species <b>1red</b> and <b>2red</b> that bear unchanged E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup> ligands. We provide strong computational and experimental evidence, including results from a large survey of data from the Cambridge Structural Database, indicating that M<sub>2</sub>E<sub>2</sub> compounds occur in quantized E<sub>2</sub> oxidation states of (2 Ɨ E<sup>2ā€“</sup>), E<sub>2</sub><sup>3ā€“</sup>, and E<sub>2</sub><sup>2ā€“</sup>, rather than displaying a continuum of variable Eā€“E bonding interactions
    corecore