17 research outputs found

    High-speed Beveled Tip Versus Standard Tip Vitrectomy Probe: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To compare the efficiency of the advanced ultravit beveled vitrector probe (10,000 cuts per minute) to the current standard ultravit highspeed (7500 cuts per minute) vitrector probe. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients undergoing routine vitrectomy surgery for epiretinal membrane, full-thickness macular hole, and vitreous opacities. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo PPV with the ultravit highspeed probe (Probe 1) or the advanced ultravit beveled probe (Probe 2). The main outcome measure was time to completion of core vitrectomy and vitreous base shave. Results: Forty patients were enrolled in this study, 20 in each cohort. The average time to completion of core vitrectomy was 10.4 +/- 1.8 min in the Probe 1 cohort compared to 9.7 +/- 2 min in the Probe 2 cohort (P = 0.21). The average time to completion of vitreous base shave was 9.6 +/- 2.7 min in the Probe 1 cohort compared to 9.4 +/- 1.8 min in the Probe 2 cohort (P = 0.39). Conclusion: In the current study, the advanced ultravit beveled probe was noninferior to the ultravit highspeed vitrectomy probe when looking at the time to completion of core vitrectomy and vitreous base shave. The increased cut rate did not affect the efficiency of vitreous removal

    Applicant Perceptions of In-Person versus Virtual Interview Format for Surgical Retina Fellowship

    No full text
    Purpose This article compares applicants' perceptions of and experiences with virtual and in-person interviews for surgical retina fellowship

    Computing uveal melanoma basal diameters: a comparative analysis of several novel techniques with improved accuracy

    No full text
    Abstract Background We sought to compare the accuracy of standard and novel echographic methods for computing intraocular tumor largest basal diameter (LBD). Design Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Subjects All patients presenting with new diagnosis of uveal melanoma (UM). Methods Ultrasounds were obtained for all patients, and axial length (AL) was measured for a subset of patients. LBD was calculated as: (1) a single chord measured on B scan ultrasound (one-chord method [1CM]), or (2) by subdividing the basal diameter into two chords, which were summated (two-chord method [2CM]), or (3) by a mathematically-derived formula (MF) based on geometric relationships. The accuracy of each method was then compared, and sensitivity of each technique to factors such as tumor size and AL were analyzed. Main outcome measures Accuracy, robustness, correctness of predicted plaque size. Results 116 UMs were analyzed; 1CM-calculated LBD underestimated 2CM-calculated LBD by 7.5% and underestimated LBD by MF by 7.8%; 2CM and MF were tightly correlated (average LBD difference = 0.038%). At larger LBDs, 1CM underestimated 2CM and MF by a much greater percentage (p  12 mm, where a single chord on ultrasound is more likely to lead to incorrect, undersized plaque selection. Our MF can be applied with great accuracy even in cases where the AL of the eye is not measured, using the population average AL (23.7 mm), and the formula LBD=23.7sin1(chord  length/chord  length23.723.7) {\text{LBD}} = 23.7\sin^{ - 1} ({{{\text{chord}}\;{\text{length}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\text{chord}}\;{\text{length}}} {23.7}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {23.7}}) LBD=23.7sin-1(chordlength/23.7)

    Effect of Intravenous Chemotherapy Regimen on Globe Salvage Success Rates for Retinoblastoma Based on Disease Class—A Meta-Analysis

    No full text
    To evaluate the relative efficacy of novel retinoblastoma treatments, eye classification-specific success rates for current standard-of-care intravenous chemotherapy regimens must be known. This meta-analysis included studies if: (1) patients received intravenous chemotherapy for retinoblastoma, (2) globe salvage data was reported, (3) only intravenous chemoreduction (with/without local consolidation) was used. The outcome measure was globe salvage success without need for salvage radiotherapy, subdivided by disease classification and chemotherapy regimen. Data from 27 studies (1483 eyes) were pooled. By Reese–Ellsworth classification, globe salvage rates were 85% (95%CI:73–92%) for Group I, 78% (95%CI:70–85%) for Group II, 68% (95%CI:56–78%) for Group III, 47% (95%CI:34–60%) for Group IV, and 35% (95%CI:26–45%) for Group V (Va: 35% [95%CI:21–54%]; Vb: 42% [95%CI:29–56%]; those without sub-classification: 31% [95%CI:19–47%]). By International Classification, globe salvage rates were 93% (95%CI:80–97%) for Group A, 83% (95%CI:73–89%) for Group B, 73% (95%CI:54–86%) for Group C, 40% (95%CI:31–51%) for Group D, and 19% (95%CI:5–50%) for Group E. Standard carboplatin-etoposide-vincristine out-performed two-drug regimens (odds ratio (OR) = 1.9 (95%CI:1.3–3.0) for Groups I-IV and OR = 2.1 (95%CI:1.3–3.4) for Group V; p = 0.002 for each). For eyes with diffuse vitreous seeds (Vb), an enhanced regimen out-performed standard chemotherapy (OR = 2.4 [95%CI:1.3–4.7]; p = 0.004). In conclusion, two-drug regimens were less effective for all eyes, whereas enhanced regimens were more effective for eyes with vitreous seeds. Novel therapies can now be compared to these baseline globe salvage rates

    Clinical implications of photophobia in progressive supranuclear palsy

    No full text
    Objective: To determine the impact of photophobia on persons with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (pwPSP) by determining the functional impact of light sensitivity using methods established in migraine research. Methods: All 60 participants (pwPSP = 15, persons with Parkinson Disease (pwPD) = 15, Older adults = 30) completed a series of questionnaires designed to assess the impact of photophobia on activities of daily living. Group comparisons were controlled for multiple comparisons using a false discovery rate of 0.05. Results: Most (14/15) pwPSP participants noted that bright light hurt their eyes, and this proportion was significantly greater than pwPD (6/15; p = 0.03, corrected). PSP participants reported statistically significantly more severe light sensitivity on a subjective 0–100 scale (p = 0.003, corrected), and noted reduced time spent in both indoor and outdoor activities. Some PSP participants (n = 3) noted that they needed to wear sunglasses indoors, but most noted a reluctance to leave their house during the day due to photophobia. PwPSP indicated that they require more help from others to complete daily tasks that require them to be outside during daylight hours. Conclusions: Overall, we note a significant debility due to photophobia in PSP, and this impacts outdoor more than indoor activities. The functional disability in PSP caused by photophobia appears to cause a substantive reduction in quality of life. Future studies could consider incorporating specific metrics to evaluate measurable differences with photophobia onset and worsening severity

    Comparison of Incremental Costs and Medicare Reimbursement for Simple vs Complex Cataract Surgery Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing

    No full text
    IMPORTANCE: Cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries across medicine and an integral part of ophthalmologic care. Complex cataract surgery requires more time and resources than simple cataract surgery, yet it remains unclear whether the incremental reimbursement for complex cataract surgery, compared with simple cataract surgery, offsets the increased costs. OBJECTIVE: To measure the difference in day-of-surgery costs and net earnings between simple and complex cataract surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study is an economic analysis at a single academic institution using time-driven activity-based costing methodology to determine the operative-day costs of simple and complex cataract surgery. Process flow mapping was used to define the operative episode limited to the day of surgery. Simple and complex cataract surgery cases (Current Procedural Terminology codes 66984 and 66982, respectively) at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center from 2017 to 2021 were included in the analysis. Time estimates were obtained using an internal anesthesia record system. Financial estimates were obtained using a mix of internal sources and prior literature. Supply costs were obtained from the electronic health record. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Difference in day-of-surgery costs and net earnings. RESULTS: A total of 16 092 cataract surgeries were included, 13 904 simple and 2188 complex. Time-based day-of-surgery costs for simple and complex cataract surgery were 1486.24and1486.24 and 2205.83, respectively, with a mean difference of 719.59(95719.59 (95% CI, 684.09-755.09;P3˘c.001).Complexcataractsurgeryrequired755.09; P \u3c .001). Complex cataract surgery required 158.26 more for costs of supplies and materials (95% CI, 117.00117.00-199.60; P \u3c .001). The total difference in day-of-surgery costs between complex and simple cataract surgery was 877.85.Incrementalreimbursementforcomplexcataractsurgerywas877.85. Incremental reimbursement for complex cataract surgery was 231.01; therefore, complex cataract surgery had a negative earnings difference of $646.84 compared with simple cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This economic analysis suggests that the incremental reimbursement for complex cataract surgery undervalues the resource costs required for the procedure, failing to cover increased costs and accounting for less than 2 minutes of increased operating time. These findings may affect ophthalmologist practice patterns and access to care for certain patients, which may ultimately justify increasing cataract surgery reimbursement
    corecore