Optimal marketing budgeting and benchmarking of platform firms

Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on Feb 16, 2010).The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.Dissertation advisor: Dr. Murali K. Mantrala.Vita.Ph. D. University of Missouri--Columbia 2009.Platform firms are firms that increase social surplus by (1) catering to distinct groups of customers such that (2) members of at least one group wish to access the other group and (3) facilitating group-access more efficiently than bi-lateral relationships between the members of the groups. Examples include markets of print media companies like newspapers and magazines (readers and advertisers), TV broadcasters (viewers and advertisers), shopping malls (shoppers and retailers), and payment cards (cardholders and merchants). The marketplace today is abundantly populated with such platform firms that operate in 'two-sided' markets. A platform firm is different from firms operating in 'one-sided' classic firm markets because their marketing strategies must take into account the fact that the benefit enjoyed by a member of one group depends upon how well the platform attracts customers from the other group. The marketing literature has largely ignored this aspect to date; hence platform firms remain an under-studied phenomenon in our field. This dissertation deals with two fundamental responsibilities of marketing managers; a) setting marketing budgets optimally and b) benchmarking the performance of individual decision making units (DMUs). In two essays, this dissertation advances knowledge with respect to optimal marketing budgeting by platform firms (Chapter 2) and benchmarking of platform DMUs (Chapter 3). The first essay (Chapter 2) makes three contributions. We note that sales-response models in the platform-firm context must capture the notion that the benefit enjoyed by a member of one group depends upon how well the platform firm attracts members from another group, i.e., the extent of cross-market effects (CMEs). CMEs are absent in 'one-sided' markets. The first contribution of the essay is a demonstration of how CMEs theoretically impact optimal investment levels and allocation ratios, extending and even reversing the extant normative budgeting rules obtained from models that ignore CMEs. The second, contribution lies in empirical demonstration of CMEs and showing how they affect the evaluation of marketing elasticity in a real-world setting. The third contribution is the development of a tool that allows a platform manager to set budgets optimally for any planning horizon by taking CMEs into account. The second essay (Chapter 3) is focused on media-based platform firms and makes two contributions. We note that productivity benchmarking involves the study of which DMU is more efficient in converting inputs into outputs. Benchmarking media-platform DMUs poses some methodological challenges by virtue of their business model. For instance, the outputs of some platform-firms are inherently networked since the outputs of some departments may serve as inputs to the other and vice versa. A survey of the literature suggests that none of the current benchmarking approaches account for all of the media-platform's benchmarking challenges simultaneously. The first contribution of this essay (Chapter 3) is to combine relatively new techniques in the operations research and statistics literatures to develop a new procedure to benchmark media-platforms that addresses the challenges. The second contribution of the essay lies in empirical demonstration/validation of the approach via an application to U.S. print newspaper firms. While doing so, the essay also demonstrates how the developed approach outperforms applications of the existing approaches. Thus, this dissertation offers insights into how to approach marketing budgeting and benchmarking decisions differently as platform-firm managers.Includes bibliographical reference

Intermittent Water Supplies: Where and Why they are Currently used and Why their Future use Should be Curtailed

Though water is the most essential element of life in most developing countries clean drinking water is supplied intermittently to consumers. Municipalities are often under the impression that intermittent supply is an ideal measure to conserve water. With over a billion people grappling with deteriorating infrastructure and water scarcity, it is impossible to neglect the effects of intermittent supply. It is essential to examine the origin of the problem, quantify the effects or consequences and then provide feasible solutions. Hence, this thesis provides a comprehensive review of the existing condition of water supply systems in developing countries but more importantly, examines the causes of the intermittency and highlights the significant economic incentive that could be achieved by maintaining a continuous supply system. Finally the thesis concludes with a series of feasible solutions including short-term and long-term plans that would assist in a complete migration towards 24-hour supply.MAS

New vistas for marketing strategy: digital, data-rich, and developing market (D-3) environments

The last decade has seen marketing strategy evolve rapidly in three major directions, which can be summarized in three Ds: digital, data-rich, and developing markets. The first D refers to "digital"; digital marketing strategy deals with firms' judicious use of digital resources to create differentiated and sustainable value for customers. The second D is "data-rich"; digital marketing has made available to researchers unprecedented data on firm and customer behavior. The third D is "developing markets"; the issue of marketing strategy in a digital and data-rich context is particularly relevant in developing markets such as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) countries. This article formally defines the scopes of the three Ds, identifies opportunities associated with three Ds, and highlights the work published in these areas that will hopefully trigger more research work in D-3 environments

Optimal Resource Allocation with Time-varying Marketing Effectiveness, Margins and Costs

The importance of optimal marketing communications mix decisions is well-recognized by both marketing scholars and practitioners. A significant volume of work has addressed the problem of dynamic marketing mix optimization assuming constant effectiveness of marketing instruments. However, the effectiveness of marketing communications varies over time for a variety of reasons. Moreover, due to factors such as inflation or deflation in media prices and/or raw material inputs, there can be differential changes in the costs of communications and/or margins on the good (or service) sold over time. The academic literature offers little normative direction on how time-varying marketing effectiveness and costs drive optimal marketing-mix levels and their relative allocation. The authors shed light on these issues by solving a monopoly firm's finite horizon dynamic marketing communications mix optimization problem involving two marketing instruments with time-varying parameters, i.e., the marketing effectiveness parameters, media costs, and product margin are all allowed to vary over time. First, they find that the structure of the solutions is similar to that of the classic Nerlove–Arrow model, for a completely general nature of time-varying effectiveness. Second, their model can be used by managers to exactly determine whether and when to switch their marketing-mix emphasis (defined by the marketing element receiving the dominant portion of the budget) over a finite planning horizon. In sum, the authors expand knowledge on optimal allocation of marketing resources with time-varying effectiveness. They also extend their solution to incorporate multiple (more than two) marketing instruments

The Bricks That Build the Clicks: Newsroom Investments and Newspaper Online Performance

As the world embraces the Internet for media consumption, the concept of a hybrid newspaper—a printed newspaper with a companion Web site—is becoming more prevalent. Many hope that online advertising revenue (OAR) will help newspapers make up for losses in print (offline) revenue. However, there is little research that has empirically investigated whether and how investment in the “bricks” (i.e., the newsroom staff and resources that produce news content) will help to build “clicks” (i.e., more online visitors and, subsequently, OAR). This article examines the issue via an econometric analysis of 12 years of longitudinal data from a hybrid newspaper. The results show that the basic success of the clicks model depends on the investment in the bricks of the newspaper (i.e., its newsroom). Specifically, although news gathering is a very expensive part of the news business, it is also a creator of value and directly brings in OAR in addition to print advertising revenue. Therefore, as newspapers seek to capture more OAR, they may need to increase, rather than decrease, investment levels in the newsroom