Application of Trap Cropping as Companion Plants for the Management of Agricultural Pests: A Review

Companion planting is a well-known strategy to manage insect pests and support a natural enemy population through vegetative diversification. Trap cropping is one such type of special companion planting strategy that is traditionally used for insect pest management through vegetative diversification used to attract insect pests away from the main crops during a critical time period by providing them an alternative preferred choice. Trap crops not only attract the insects for feeding and oviposition, but also act as a sink for any pathogen that may be a vector. Considerable research has been conducted on different trap crops as companion plant species to develop improved pest management strategies. Despite this, little consensus exists regarding optimal trap cropping systems for diverse pest management situations. An advantage of trap cropping over an artificially released natural enemy-based biological control could be an attractive remedy for natural enemies in cropping systems. Besides, many trap crop species can conserve natural enemies. This secondary effect of attracting natural enemies may be an advantage compared to the conventional means of pest control. However, this additional consideration requires a more knowledge-intensive background to designing an effective trap cropping system. We have provided information based on different trap crops as companion plant, their functions and an updated list of trap cropping applications to attract insect pests and natural enemies that should be proven as helpful in future trap cropping endeavors

Entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of oriental fruit fly Bacterocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Background: Fruit fly species are most damaging pests around the globe which reduced the commercial value of fruits at maturity. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) from genera Heterorhabditis and Steinernema cause death by inducing septicimia in insect pests in the soil, moreover, endemic nearly all soils. Current study was planned to manage the oriental fruit fly, Bacterocera dorsalis (Hendel.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) hazards by using indigenous EPNs (Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, H. indica, Steinernema asiticum, S. corpocapsae and S. glasseri) as they have host finding ability and recognise as potential eco-friendly biocontrol agent over synthetic chemicals. Methods: Study for the assessment of EPNs concentrations, various temperatures, soil type and soil moisture levels against mortality (%) of fruit fly (B. dorsalis) larvae was conducted in completely randomized design (CRD) under factorial arrangements. Results: EPNs concentrations (70 IJs/ml, 110 IJs/ml, 150 IJs/ml) showed that S. asiaticum (150 IJs/ml) showed maximum mortality (94.97 %) of B. dorsalis as compared to other used EPNs along with their respective concentrations. Impact of various temperatures (20 °C, 24 °C, 28 °C, 32 °C, 36 °C) with respect to used EPNs exhibited that H. indica (36 °C) showed maximum mortality (94.33 %) of B. dorsalis as compared to all other treatment. Various soil types (Sandy, Sandy loam, Loam, Clay) impacted the infectivity of EPNs against fruit fly, In case of sandy loam soil, S. asiaticum showed maximum mortality (98.05 %) of B. dorsalis followed by all used treatments. Soil moisture level (12 %, 18 %, 24 %, 30 %) also significantly influenced the infectivity of EPNs against mortality of fruit fly. In case of 12% moisture level, S. asiaticum showed maximum mortality (99.06 %) of B. dorsalis over all the applied treatments along with respective moisture levels. Conclusion: In crux, Steinernema asiaticum higher concentration exhibited efficient control of fruit fly larvae in sandy loam soil with 12 % moisture level at 36 °C over the used EPN species. While application of EPNs against fruit fly is most suitable strategy to manage the fruit fly hazards and it should be included as a part of integrated pest management control programme

Genomic analysis and in vivo efficacy of Pediococcus acidilactici as a potential probiotic to prevent hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia and gastrointestinal infections

Abstract Lactic acid bacteria are the well acknowledged probiotics that can cure a variety of diseases. In this study, we observed the in vivo potentials of Pediococcus to treat hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia and gastrointestinal infections. A total of 77 Lactobacillus were isolated from the milk of 10 cows and 10 goats, four of those strains inhibited both carbohydrates-hydrolyzing enzymes, α-glucosidase, and α-amylase. They all showed antagonistic effects on pathogenic E. coli and S. Typhimurium which were confirmed by performing pathogen challenge test and visualizing on Electron microscopy. 16S rRNA gene sequence identified that all four strains belong to Pediococcus genus which were further distinguished as Pediococcus acidilactici by pheS gene sequence. Whole genome sequence analysis revealed their non-pathogenic properties for human and the presence of probiotic genes responsible for stress resistance, immunomodulation, adhesion, metal and drug resistance. In vivo trial with diabetes-induced mice ascertained that all Pediococcus acidilactici had significant potentials to reduce elevated glucose and low-density lipoprotein level in blood. Interestingly, two out of four strains were significantly more effective (p < 0.0001 each) than metformin in reducing the blood glucose level. This in vivo study demonstrated that Pediococcus acidilactici might be a promising probiotic to prevent hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia and gastrointestinal infections