13 research outputs found
Summary of our confidence in effect estimates and ranking of femoral fixation methods.
Summary of our confidence in effect estimates and ranking of femoral fixation methods.</p
Consistency and inconsistency detection for the outcomes.
Consistency and inconsistency detection for the outcomes.</p
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for KT-1000 assessment.
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for KT-1000 assessment.</p
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for IKDC score A or B.
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for IKDC score A or B.</p
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for VAS score.
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for VAS score.</p
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for Lachman’s test.
Rank probabilities of fixation methods for Lachman’s test.</p
Baseline characteristics of the included studies.
Baseline characteristics of the included studies.</p
Network plots of fixation method comparisons for various outcomes.
3A: KT-1000 assessment; 3B: IKDC score A or B; 3C: Lachman’s test; 3D: Pivot-shift test; 3E: VAS score. IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; VAS: visual analogue scale; CB: cortical button; CP: cross-pin; IS: interference screw.</p