Summary of our confidence in effect estimates and ranking of femoral fixation methods.

Summary of our confidence in effect estimates and ranking of femoral fixation methods.</p

Consistency and inconsistency detection for the outcomes.

Consistency and inconsistency detection for the outcomes.</p

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for KT-1000 assessment.

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for KT-1000 assessment.</p

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for IKDC score A or B.

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for IKDC score A or B.</p

Flow chart for search process.

Flow chart for search process.</p

PRISMA 2020 checklist.

(DOCX)</p

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for VAS score.

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for VAS score.</p

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for Lachman’s test.

Rank probabilities of fixation methods for Lachman’s test.</p

Baseline characteristics of the included studies.

Baseline characteristics of the included studies.</p

Network plots of fixation method comparisons for various outcomes.

3A: KT-1000 assessment; 3B: IKDC score A or B; 3C: Lachman’s test; 3D: Pivot-shift test; 3E: VAS score. IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; VAS: visual analogue scale; CB: cortical button; CP: cross-pin; IS: interference screw.</p