Forest plot of SNP rs2180341 per-allele odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the risk of breast cancer among studies from Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) breast cancer cases and controls of European ancestry.

<p>Studies are weighted and ranked according to the inverse of the between-study and within study variation of the log odds ratio, which is also represented by the size of the shaded box around the study-specific point estimate. The solid line indicates the OR = 1 and the dashed lined indicates the summary OR of all studies. A description of the study acronyms can be found in the <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035706#pone.0035706.s001" target="_blank">Supporting Information S1</a>.</p

Association between SNP rs2180341 and breast cancer risk by estrogen receptor (ER) status among cases and controls of European ancestry, Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC).

<p>Association between SNP rs2180341 and breast cancer risk by estrogen receptor (ER) status among cases and controls of European ancestry, Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC).</p

Genomic features surrounding the 9p22.2 locus.

<p>Illustration of the genomic region (chr9:16,839,835–16,924,468) encompassing peaks (shaded areas) containing candidate causal variants associated with ovarian cancer risk in <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers. Epigenomic data from Coetzee et al., (2015) [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0158801#pone.0158801.ref020" target="_blank">20</a>] representing potential regulatory elements in ovarian cells (iOSE4 and iOSE11) and fallopian tube (FTSEC33) cells derived from formaldehyde assisted identification of regulatory elements sequencing (FAIRE-seq) and histone modification ChIP-seq are shown as black bars. Variants which overlap one of these features are coloured red. Data from the ENCODE project including histone modification ChIP-seq for three modifications (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac) are shown as coloured histograms, as well as DNaseI hypersensitive site mapping and transcription factor ChIP-seq. The positions of all common SNPs from dbSNP build 142 are shown in the lowest track.</p

Associations between SNPs in 9p22.2 with ovarian cancer risk for the meta-analysis of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers.

<p>(A) The purple diamond corresponds to the strongest associated SNP and the colour code indicates the linkage disequilibrium with respect to this variant. Horizontal lines indicate the -log₁₀ p-value such that the SNPs above the line are the potential causal ones. This set was defined based on a likelihood ratio for a particular SNP as being less or equal than 100, relative to the most likely variant and r²>0.1. (B) Haplotype block indicating relevant SNPs. From left to right the indicated SNPs correspond to: the strongest associated in <i>BRCA1/2</i> meta-analysis, the strongest in <i>BRCA1</i> and the strongest in <i>BRCA2</i>.</p

p-values of association (−log10 scale) with breast cancer risk in <i>BRCA2</i> carriers for genotyped and imputed SNPs in the <i>NEIL2</i> gene.

<p>SNP rs1466785 is indicated with a purple arrow and the best causal imputed SNPs, rs804276 and rs804271 are indicated with a red arrow. Colors represent the pariwise r². Plot generated with LocusZoom <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004256#pgen.1004256-Pruim1" target="_blank">[42]</a> (<a href="http://csg.sph.umich.edu/locuszoom/" target="_blank">http://csg.sph.umich.edu/locuszoom/</a>).</p

Associations with breast and ovarian cancer risk for SNPs observed at p-trend<0.05 in stage II of the experiment.

a<p>Hazard Ratio per allele (1 df) estimated from the retrospective likelihood analysis.</p>b<p>Hazard Ratio under the genotype specific models (2df) estimated from the retrospective likelihood analysis.</p>c<p>p-values were based on the score test.</p>d<p>HR per allele of 1.69 and p-trend of 1×10⁻⁴ for <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers in stage I of the study.</p>e<p>HR per allele of 1.43 and p-trend of 0.01 for <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers in stage I of the study.</p>f<p>HR per allele of 1.30 and p-trend of 0.03 for <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers in stage I of the study.</p>g<p>HR per allele of 0.64 and p-trend of 0.057 for <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers in stage I of the study.</p>h<p>HR per allele of 1.25 and p-trend of 0.04 for <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers in stage I of the study.</p>i<p>HR per allele of 1.25 and p-trend of 0.058 for <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers in stage I of the study.</p>j<p>rs3093926 did not yield results under the genotype specific model due to the low minor allele frequency.</p><p>Complete description of results from stage I are included in Supplementary <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004256#pgen.1004256.s002" target="_blank">Table S1</a>.</p><p>Highlighted in bold are those SNPs showing strongest associations with breast or ovarian cancer risk (p<0.01).</p

Predicted breast and ovarian cancer absolute risks for <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers at the 5^th, 10^th, 90^th, and 95^th percentiles of the combined SNP profile distributions.

<p>The minimum, maximum and average risks are also shown. Predicted cancer risks are based on the associations of known breast or ovarian cancer susceptibility loci (identified through GWAS) with cancer risk for <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers and loci identified through the present study. Breast cancer risks based on the associations with: 1q32, 10q25.3, 19p13, 6q25.1, 12p11, <i>TOX3</i>, 2q35, <i>LSP1</i>, <i>RAD51L1</i> (based on HR and minor allele frequency estimates from <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen-1003212-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>, <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen-1003212-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>, and <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen.1003212.s016" target="_blank">Table S4</a>) and <i>TERT </i><a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen.1003212-Bojesen1" target="_blank">[31]</a>. Ovarian cancer risks based on the associations with: 9p22, 8q24, 3q25, 17q21, 19p13 (<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen-1003212-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>) and 17q21.31, 4q32.3 (<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen-1003212-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>). Only the top SNP from each region was chosen. Average breast and ovarian cancer risks were obtained from published data <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen.1003212-Antoniou10" target="_blank">[25]</a>. The methods for calculating the predicted risks have been described previously <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212#pgen.1003212-Antoniou11" target="_blank">[28]</a>.</p