6 research outputs found

    Effects of bias gas flow, lung compliance and airway resistance on pressure and flow in a test lung.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Effect of bias gas flow on the pressure wave in the ventilation circuit; dotted line indicates 200 msec after inflation onset and values indicate the pressure at this point, expressed as a percentage of the peak pressure. (B) Effect of lung compliance on gas flow into the lung at different bias gas flows. (C) Relationship between airway resistance and gas flow into the lung, measured at 3 different lung compliances and 4 different bias gas flows.</p

    Effect of bias gas flow on cardiorespiratory parameters.

    No full text
    <p>Values are mean ± SEM for heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (BP), PaO<sub>2</sub>, PaCO<sub>2</sub>, FiO<sub>2</sub> and pneumothorax (PNX) during ventilation at ventilator bias gas flows of 8, 18 or 28 L/min. Data are averaged for all time points. *p&lt;0.05 vs. flow 18 L/min,<sup> †</sup><i>p</i>&lt;0.05 vs. flow 28 L/min.</p

    Effect of bias gas flow on mRNA levels of <i>CTGF</i>, <i>EGR1</i> and <i>CYR61</i>.

    No full text
    <p>mRNA levels, expressed as fold change relative to mRNA levels in age-matched un-ventilated control tissue (<i>n</i> = 8), of <i>CTGF</i> (A), <i>EGR1</i> (B) and <i>CYR61</i> (C) in lung tissue of lambs ventilated with a ventilator bias gas flow of 8 (<i>n = </i>11), 18 (<i>n = </i>11) or 28 L/min (<i>n = </i>14). * <i>p</i>&lt;0.05 vs. flow 18 L/min, <sup>§ </sup><i>p</i>&lt;0.05 vs. control tissue and <sup>§§ </sup><i>p</i>&lt;0.01 vs. control tissue.</p

    Representative photomicrographs of lung tissue from age matched non-ventilated controls and ventilated animals.

    No full text
    <p>Photomicrographs of controls (<i>n</i> = 8) are shown in the first row (A, E, I), of lambs ventilated at 8 L/min (<i>n</i> = 5) in the second row (B, F, J), 18 L/min (<i>n</i> = 5) in the third row (C, G, K) and 28 L/min (<i>n</i> = 5) in the fourth row (D, H, L). Columns demonstrate elastin (stained black with Hart’s resorcin stain; A–D), differentiated myofibroblasts (stained brown using immunohistochemistry; E–H), and collagen type I and III fibres (stained black with Gordon-Sweet’s stain; I–L). Bar 10 µm. Arrows (↑) demonstrate secondary septal crests with elastin (A) or myofibroblasts (E) visible at the tip. Solid arrowheads (▴) demonstrate abnormal deposition of elastin and open arrowheads (Δ) demonstrate thickened interstitium (C, D, H) containing a finer meshwork of collagen fibres in tissue ventilated at 18 and 28 L/min (K, L).</p

    Effect of bias gas flow on ventilatory parameters.

    No full text
    <p>Values are mean ± SEM for inflation time (Ti), expiratory time (Te), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean airway pressure (MAP), ventilator rate, tidal volume (TV), inspiratory flow, expiratory flow, rate of rise for inspiratory flow (Δ inspiratory flow), ventilator efficiency index (VEI) and resistance during ventilation at ventilator bias gas flows of 8, 18 or 28 L/min. Data are averaged for all time points. *p&lt;0.05; **<i>p</i>&lt;0.01 vs. flow 18 L/min,<sup> †</sup><i>p</i>&lt;0.05 and <sup>‡</sup><i>p</i>&lt;0.01 vs. flow 28 L/min.</p

    Quantitative analysis of the effect of bias gas flow on pulmonary histology.

    No full text
    <p>The proportion of lung tissue stained positive for elastin, αSMA and collagen, the proportion of Ki67-positive cells (labelling index, representing mitotic cells) and the proportion of each field of view occupied by tissue rather than air space (using a point counting technique) <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0047044#pone.0047044-Allison1" target="_blank">[7]</a> for age matched non-ventilated controls and animals ventilated at 8, 18 and 28 L/min. <sup>§</sup><i>p</i>&lt;0.05 vs. control tissue, * <i>p</i>&lt;0.05 vs. flow 18 L/min, <sup>†</sup><i>p</i>&lt;0.05 vs. flow 28 L/min.</p
    corecore