Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model-0

Ated groups. In the loxoprofen-Na group, pain threshold significantly increased compared with the control group (*< 0.05).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/15</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():15-15.</p><p>Published online 31 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2276498.</p><p></p

Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model-3

Ated groups. In the loxoprofen-Na group, pain threshold significantly increased compared with the control group (*< 0.05).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/15</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():15-15.</p><p>Published online 31 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2276498.</p><p></p

Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model-2

Ted (b) groups.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/15</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():15-15.</p><p>Published online 31 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2276498.</p><p></p

Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model-1

Fied between the control group and treatment-naïve animals (*< 0.05). The amount of PGEin the groups treated with loxoprofen-Na and indomethacin was decreased compared with the control group (*< 0.05) (n = 5 for naïve group; n = 6 for treatment groups).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Analgesic effect of percutaneously absorbed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an experimental study in a rat acute inflammation model"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/15</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():15-15.</p><p>Published online 31 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2276498.</p><p></p

Vasodilative effects of prostaglandin Ederivate on arteries of nerve roots in a canine model of a chronically compressed cauda equina-1

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Vasodilative effects of prostaglandin Ederivate on arteries of nerve roots in a canine model of a chronically compressed cauda equina"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/41</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():41-41.</p><p>Published online 8 Apr 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2358890.</p><p></p

Vasodilative effects of prostaglandin Ederivate on arteries of nerve roots in a canine model of a chronically compressed cauda equina-3

6α-CD (p < 0.05).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Vasodilative effects of prostaglandin Ederivate on arteries of nerve roots in a canine model of a chronically compressed cauda equina"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/41</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():41-41.</p><p>Published online 8 Apr 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2358890.</p><p></p

Vasodilative effects of prostaglandin Ederivate on arteries of nerve roots in a canine model of a chronically compressed cauda equina-0

6α-CD (p < 0.05).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Vasodilative effects of prostaglandin Ederivate on arteries of nerve roots in a canine model of a chronically compressed cauda equina"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/41</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():41-41.</p><p>Published online 8 Apr 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2358890.</p><p></p

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the derivation and validation datasets

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/102</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007;8():102-102.</p><p>Published online 30 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2176057.</p><p></p

Scatter plot of differences versus the means of the test and the retest

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/102</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007;8():102-102.</p><p>Published online 30 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2176057.</p><p></p

Comparison of the sensitivity of each question for radicular and cauda equina types of LSS

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/102</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007;8():102-102.</p><p>Published online 30 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2176057.</p><p></p