Relationship of Severity of Hepatitis A with Polymorphisms in Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1 (HAVCR1) Gene

Introduction and aim. HAVCR1 protein is the cellular receptor for hepatitis A virus (HAV). Genetic polymorphism in this gene may alter the outcome of HAV infection. In a previous study, a 6-amino acid insertion (157insMTTTVP) in HAVCR1 gene was associated with more severe disease. We decided to investigate this association further.Material and methods. We sequenced exon 4 of the HAVCR1 gene in patients with clinical hepatitis A attending our institution, and a group of healthy controls in a disease-endemic setting in India. Frequencies of different haplotypes of a genomic region with two overlapping insertion-deletion polymorphisms (indels; rs141023871 and rs139041445) were compared between patients and controls, as well as between patients with and without a severe form of disease (liver failure).Results. The gene had three haplotypes in the region of interest - a short form, an intermediate-form with a 5-amino acid 157insMTTVP insertion and a long-form with a 6-amino acid 157insMTTTVP insertion. The allele frequency (29/150 [19%] vs. 43/146 [29%]; p = ns) and haplotype frequency (29/75 [39%] vs. 39/73 [53%]; p = ns) of the 157insMTTTVP variant were similar in hepatitis A patients and healthy controls (30%). Further, the allele frequency (12/58 [21%] vs. 17/92 [18%]; p = ns) and haplotype frequency (12/29 [41%] vs.17/46 [37%]; p = ns) of the longest variant were also similar in patients with severe and mild disease.Discussion. In the study population, the 157insMTTTVP variant of HAVCR1 gene was not associated with more severe outcome of HAV infection. Further studies in other populations around the world are needed to assess the relation of this genetic variation with disease outcome

Spectrum of genomic variations in Indian patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Abstract Background Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is caused by variations in ATP8B1, ABCB11 or ABCB4 genes. Data on genetic variations in Indian patients with PFIC are lacking. Methods Coding and splice regions of the three genes were sequenced in unrelated Indian children with PFIC phenotype. The variations identified were looked for in parents, 30 healthy persons and several variation databases, and their effect was assessed in-silico. Results Among 25 children (aged 1–144 months), nine (36%) had unique major genomic variations (ATP8B1: 4, ABCB11: 3 and ABCB4: 2). Seven had homozygous variations, which were assessed as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’. These included: (i) four amino acid substitutions (ATP8B1: c.1660G > A/p.Asp554Asn and c.2941G > A/p.Glu981Lys; ABCB11: c.548 T > C/p.Met183Thr; ABCB4: c.431G > A/p.Arg144Gln); (ii) one 3-nucleotide deletion causing an amino acid deletion (ATP8B1: c.1587_1589delCTT/p.Phe529del); (iii) one single-nucleotide deletion leading to frame-shift and premature termination (ABCB11: c.1360delG/p.Val454Ter); and (iv) a complex inversion of 4 nucleotides with a single-nucleotide insertion leading to frame-shift and premature termination (ATP8B1: c.[589_592inv;592_593insA]/p.Gly197LeufsTer10). Two variations were found in heterozygous form: (i) a splice-site variation likely to cause abnormal splicing (ABCB11: c.784 + 1G > C), and (ii) a nucleotide substitution that created a premature stop codon (ABCB4: c.475C > T/p.Arg159Ter); these were considered as variations of uncertain significance. Three of the nine variations were novel. Conclusions Nine major genomic variations, including three novel ones, were identified in nearly one-third  of Indian children with PFIC. No variation was identified in nearly two-thirds of patients, who may have been related to variations in promoter or intronic regions of the three PFIC genes, or in other bile-salt transport genes

Additional file 1: of Spectrum of genomic variations in Indian patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Table S1. Results of prediction of effect, using various bioinformatic tools, of various ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’ non-synonymous genomic variations. Table S2. Results of prediction of effect, using various bioinformatic tools, of various ‘neutral’ non-synonymous genomic variations. Table S3. Synonymous genomic variations identified in Indian patients with PFIC syndrome (DOCX 24 kb)