2 research outputs found
The Prospect of Salophen in Fluorescence Lifetime Sensing of Al<sup>3+</sup>
We
have assessed the potential of salophen, a tetradentate Schiff
base, in fluorescence sensing of Al<sup>3+</sup> ions. While performing
this investigation, we have noticed conflicting literature reports
on the fluorescence spectral maximum and quantum yield of salophen.
So, the compound has been purified by repeated crystallization. Fluorescence
studies have been performed on samples in which the absorption and
excitation spectra are completely superimposable. The purified compound
exhibits a feeble fluorescence at 545 nm, associated with an ultrafast
fluorescence decay. This is rationalized by excited state proton transfer
and torsional motions within the molecule, which provide efficient
nonradiative channels of deactivation of its excited state. The fluorescence
quantum yield increases upon complexation of salophen with Zn<sup>2+</sup> as well as Al<sup>3+</sup>. The increase is significantly
more upon complexation with Al<sup>3+</sup>. However, fluorescence
maxima are similar for the two complexes. This indicates that fluorescence
intensity may not be a good parameter for Al<sup>3+</sup> sensing
by salophen, in the presence of a large excess of Zn<sup>2+</sup>.
This problem can be circumvented if fluorescence lifetime is used
as the sensing parameter, as the lifetime of the Al<sup>3+</sup> complex
is in the nanosecond time regime while that of the Zn<sup>2+</sup> complex is in tens of picoseconds. The significant difference in
the fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime between the two complexes
is explained as follows: the Al<sup>3+</sup> complex is monomeric,
but the Zn<sup>2+</sup> complex is dimeric. Quantum chemical calculations
indicate a higher density of states near the locally excited state
for the dimeric complex. This may lead to more efficient nonradiative
pathways
Substituted versus Naked Thiourea Ligand Containing Pseudotetrahedral Cobalt(II) Complexes: A Comparative Study on Its Magnetization Relaxation Dynamics Phenomenon
A series of mononuclear
tetrahedral cobaltÂ(II) complexes with the general molecular formula
[CoÂ(L<sub>1</sub>)<sub>2</sub>X<sub>2</sub>] [where L<sub>1</sub> =
tetramethylthiourea ([(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>Cî—»S)
and X = Cl (<b>1</b>), Br (<b>2</b>), and I (<b>3</b>)] were isolated, and their structures were characterized by single-crystal
X-ray diffraction. The experimental direct-current magnetic data are
excellently reproduced by fitting both χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i>(<i>T</i>) and <i>M</i>(<i>H</i>) simultaneously using the spin Hamiltonian (SH) parameters <i>D</i><sub><b>1</b></sub> = −18.1 cm<sup>–1</sup> and <i>g</i><sub><b>1</b>,iso</sub> = 2.26, <i>D</i><sub><b>2</b></sub> = −16.4 cm<sup>–1</sup> and <i>g</i><sub><b>2</b>,iso</sub> = 2.33, and <i>D</i><sub><b>3</b></sub> = −22 cm<sup>–1</sup> and <i>g</i><sub><b>3</b>,iso</sub> = 2.4 for <b>1</b>–<b>3</b>, respectively, and the sign of <i>D</i> was unambiguously confirmed from X-band electron paramagnetic
resonance measurements. The effective energy barrier extracted for
the magnetically diluted complexes <b>1</b>–<b>3</b> (10%) is larger than the barrier observed for the pure samples and
implies a nonzero contribution of dipolar interaction to the magnetization
relaxation dynamics. The SH parameters extracted for the three complexes
drastically differ from their respective parent complexes that possess
the general molecular formula [CoÂ(L)<sub>2</sub>X<sub>2</sub>] [where
L = thiourea [(NH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cî—»S] and X = Cl (<b>1a</b>), Br (<b>2a</b>), and I (<b>3a</b>)], which
is rationalized by detailed ab initio calculations. An exhaustive
theoretical study reveals that both the ground and excited states
are not pure but rather multideterminental in nature (<b>1</b>–<b>3</b>). Noticeably, the substitution of L by L<sub>1</sub> induces structural distortion in <b>1</b>–<b>3</b> on the level of the secondary coordination sphere compared
to <b>1a</b>–<b>3a</b>. This distortion leads to
an overall reduction in |<i>E</i>/<i>D</i>| of <b>1</b>–<b>3</b> compared to <b>1a</b>–<b>3a</b>. This may be one of the reasons for the origin of the slower
relaxation times of <b>1</b>–<b>3</b> compared
to <b>1a</b>–<b>3a</b>