Endothelin ETA receptors predominate in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

AIMS: Endothelin-1 levels are raised in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Our aim in this study was to identify the presence of endothelin receptors in patients with CTEPH by analysing tissue removed at pulmonary endarterectomy. MAIN METHODS: Pulmonary endarterectomy tissue cross-sections were analysed using autoradiography with [(125)I]-ET-1 using ligands selective for ETA or ETB to determine sub-type distribution. The precise cellular localisation of ETA and ETB receptors was determined using selective antisera to both sub-types and compared with haematoxylin and eosin, Elastic Van Gieson and smooth muscle actin labelled sections. KEY FINDINGS: Two patterns of ET-1 binding were found. In sections with frequent recanalised channels, ET-1 bound to the smooth muscle cells surrounding the channels. In sections where there was less organised thrombus with no obvious re-canalisation, minimal ET-1 binding was observed. Some contractile type smooth muscle cells not associated with recanalised channels and diffusely spread throughout the PEA material were associated with ET receptor antibody binding on immunohistochemistry. There was a greater expression of the ETA receptor type in the specimens. SIGNIFICANCE: The presence of ET-1 receptors in the chronic thrombus in proximal CTEPH suggests ET-1 could act not only on the distal vasculopathy in the unobstructed vessels but may also stimulate smooth muscle cell proliferation within chronic clot. The abundance of ET receptors within the tissue provides evidence that the ET pathway is involved in the pathology of chronic thrombus reorganisation leading to CTEPH providing a rationale for the repurposing of ET receptor antagonists in the treatment of this condition.We acknowledge the support of the referring UK centres for PH; the Pulmonary Hypertension Association-UK, Wellcome Trust award WT107715/Z/15/Z, Programmes in Translational Medicines and Therapeutics (085686) and in Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease (096822/Z/11/Z), the British Heart Foundation PG/09/050/27734, MRC and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. We also acknowledge the support of the Cambridge NIHR BRC Cell Phenotyping Hub and the Papworth Hospital Research Tissue Bank.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Elsevier via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.03

Role of NT-proBNP and 6MWD in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

SummaryBackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the role of NT-proBNP and six minute walking distance (6MWD) in the pre- and post-operative assessment of subjects undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).MethodsSubjects undergoing PEA between August 2004 and July 2006 were assessed at baseline and 3 months post-operatively with resting haemodynamics, NT-proBNP and 6MWD.ResultsA number of 111 subjects underwent surgery, of which 102 were included. 15 subjects died before their 3 month assessment. Non-survivors had significantly worse preoperative NT-proBNP and 6MWD (4728pg/mL vs 1863pg/mL, p=0.001, 182.4m vs 263.5m, p=0.001). Taking pre-operative cut-off values of 1200pg/mL for NT-proBNP and 345m for 6MWD, both tests had high negative predictive value for predicting mortality (97.3% and 100%, respectively). Amongst survivors, peri-operative changes in NT-proBNP and 6MWD correlated with changes in total pulmonary resistance (TPR) (r=0.49, p<0.001 and r=−0.46, p<0.001). Post-operatively, both NT-proBNP and 6MWD also correlated with mPAP (r=0.65, p<0.001 and r=−0.50, p<0.001) and PVR (r=0.63, p<0.001 and r=−0.47, p<0.001). The ability of NT-proBNP to predict persistent pulmonary hypertension was significantly confounded by age, but not gender, BMI or renal function.ConclusionsPre-operative evaluation with NT-proBNP and 6MWD helps risk-stratify patients prior to PEA. Post-operatively, both markers correlate with changes in disease burden and right ventricular function. These results suggest that both NT-proBNP and 6MWD offer effective ‘bedside’ tools for the long term follow up of patients with CTEPH

The outcome of reoperative pulmonary endarterectomy surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PH). Despite excellent outcomes following PEA, a small proportion of patients have residual proximal disease or present with recurrent chronic thromboembolic PH and may benefit from further surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse outcomes following reoperative PEA at a high-volume national tertiary referral centre for the management of chronic thromboembolic PH. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed using our prospectively maintained PH database to identify all patients who underwent reoperative PEA surgery between the commencement of the programme in 1997 and January 2017, and the patients' data were collected for analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent reoperative PEA during the period of study. The mean interval between primary procedure and reoperative procedure was 6.3 years. Significant improvements were observed in pulmonary haemodynamics following reoperative PEA. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 46.8 to 29.8 mmHg (P < 0.0001) and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased from 662 to 362 dyne·s·cm-5 (P = 0.0007). A significant functional improvement in the 6-min walking test distance was also observed, increasing from 327 to 460 m at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.0018). Median length of hospital stay was 12 days. In-hospital mortality was 8.3% with 1-year survival of 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative PEA is technically possible and relatively safe, achieving good functional and physiological outcomes. Patients must be carefully selected by a multidisciplinary team, and surgery should be performed in experienced centres

Demographic features, BMPR2 status and outcomes in distal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is potentially curative in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), some patients have distally distributed disease that is not amenable to surgery. The aetiology and characteristics of this patient group are currently not well understood. OBJECTIVES: This study compares the baseline demographic features and outcomes in subjects with distal CTEPH, those with proximal CTEPH and those with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) to determine whether these conditions represent separate entities or whether they exist along the same spectrum of disease. METHODS: The medical history, clinical characteristics, bone morphogenetic protein receptor type II (BMPR2) mutation status and outcomes of 96 subjects with IPAH, 35 with distal CTEPH and 68 with proximal CTEPH referred to a single specialist centre between 1994 and 2005 were reviewed. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the distal CTEPH, proximal CTEPH and IPAH groups in age (55.9 years vs 54.8 years vs 46.2 years, p<0.001), proportion who were male (43% vs 69% vs 29%, p<0.001), previous deep vein thrombosis (28.6% vs 30.9% vs 3.1%, p<0.001), positive BMPR2 status (0% vs 0% vs 15%, p = 0.018), mean pulmonary artery pressure (47.3 mm Hg vs 45.4 mm Hg vs 54.8 mm Hg, p<0.001) and total pulmonary resistance (12.9 WU vs 12.4 WU vs 18.1 WU, p<0.001). Patients with distal CTEPH and those with IPAH were managed similarly and had comparable survival characteristics (1 year survival 77% vs 86%; 3 year survival 53% vs 60%; p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with distal CTEPH share certain demographic features with patients with proximal CTEPH that not only indicate a common aetiology but also help to differentiate them from patients with IPAH. Despite more favourable haemodynamic parameters in those with distal CTEPH, patients in this group had a poor long-term outcome which was similar to that of patients with IPAH

Natural history of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with no or mild pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: We describe baseline characteristics, disease progression and mortality in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease patients as a function of mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) according to new and previous definitions of pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease between January, 2015 and December, 2019 were dichotomized according to initial mPAP: ≤ 20 mmHg ('normal') vs 21-24 mmHg ('mildly-elevated'). Baseline features were compared between the groups, and pairwise analysis performed to determine changes in clinical endpoints at 1-year, excluding those who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy or did not attend follow-up. Mortality was assessed for the whole cohort over the entire study period. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were included; 57 had mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg and 56 had mPAP 21-24 mmHg. Normal mPAP patients had lower pulmonary vascular resistance (1.6 vs 2.5WU, p < 0.01) and right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (5.9 vs 7.8 mmHg, p < 0.01) at presentation. At 3 years, no major deterioration was seen in either group. No patients were treated with pulmonary artery vasodilators. Eight had undergone pulmonary endarterectomy. Over 37 months median follow-up, mortality was 7.0% in the normal mPAP group and 8.9% in the mildly-elevated mPAP group. Cause of death was malignancy in 62.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease patients with mild pulmonary hypertension have statistically higher right ventricular end-diastolic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance than those with mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg. Baseline characteristics were otherwise similar. Neither group displayed disease progression on non-invasive tests up to 3 years. Mortality over 37 months follow-up is 8%, and mainly attributable to malignancy. Further prospective study is required to validate these findings

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and co-existing lung disease: is this a new phenotype?

Patients classified as idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (defined as Group 1 on European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Cardiac Society (ESC) criteria) may have evidence of minor co-existing lung disease on thoracic computed tomography. We hypothesised that these idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients (IPAH lung disease) are a separate subgroup of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension with different phenotype and outcome compared with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients without co-existing lung disease (IPAH no lung disease). Patients with ‘IPAH lung disease’ have been eligible for all clinical trials of Group 1 patients because they have normal clinical examination and normal spirometry but we wondered whether they responded to treatment and had similar survival to patients with ‘IPAH no lung disease’. We described the outcome of the cohort of patients with ‘IPAH no lung disease’ in a previous paper. Here, we have compared incident ‘IPAH lung disease’ patients with ‘IPAH no lung disease’ patients diagnosed concurrently in all eight Pulmonary Hypertension centres in the UK and Ireland between 2001–2009. Compared with ‘IPAH no lung disease’ (n = 355), ‘IPAH lung disease’ patients (n = 137) were older, less obese, predominantly male, more likely to be current/ex-smokers and had lower six-minute walk distance, lower % predicted diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, lower mean pulmonary arterial pressure and lower pulmonary vascular resistance index. After three months of pulmonary hypertension-targeted treatment, six-minute walk distance improved equally in ‘IPAH lung disease’ and ‘IPAH no lung disease’. However, survival of ‘IPAH lung disease’ was lower than ‘IPAH no lung disease’ (one year survival: 72% compared with 93%). This survival was significantly worse in ‘IPAH lung disease’ even after adjusting for age, gender, smoking history, comorbidities and haemodynamics. ‘IPAH lung disease’ patients had similar short-term improvement in six-minute walk distance with anti-pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy but worse survival compared with ‘IPAH no lung disease’ patients. This suggests that ‘IPAH lung disease’ are a separate phenotype and should not be lumped with ‘IPAH no lung disease’ in clinical trials of Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial size and response to sildenafil in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

BackgroundRelative area change (RAC) of the proximal pulmonary artery is a measurement of pulmonary artery distensibility and has been shown to correlate with vasoreactivity studies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. We have previously noted a relationship between invasive hemodynamic vasoreactivity testing and long-term response to sildenafil in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We therefore set out to determine whether RAC can provide useful correlatory non-invasive data.MethodsPatients recruited to a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) of sildenafil at 40 mg 3 times daily underwent additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the baseline of the trial. Eighteen patients had an MRI that led to a diagnosis of inoperable distal CTEPH or significant residual CTEPH post-operatively. The primary end-point was improvement in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) with secondary end-points of right heart catheterization–based hemodynamics, N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) and functional class. RAC assessed by MRI was correlated with trial end-points.ResultsFourteen subjects with baseline MRI completed the protocol. RAC was the only baseline variable that correlated at 1 year to the primary end-point of improvement in 6MWT (r = 0.7, p = 0.006), and also to a change in NT pro-BNP (r = 0.59, p = 0.03). Using a cut-off of RAC over 20% there was an 87.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45% to 100%) and a 66.7% specificity (95% CI: 22% to 96%) for an improvement in 6MWT of >40 meters.ConclusionsRAC correlates with functional response to sildenafil, as measured by the 6MWT, and improved heart function, as measured by NT pro-BNP. RAC shows potential in understanding and possibly predicting treatment response