Incidences between points and lines in three dimensions

We give a fairly elementary and simple proof that shows that the number of incidences between $m$ points and $n$ lines in ${\mathbb R}^3$, so that no plane contains more than $s$ lines, is $$O\left(m^{1/2}n^{3/4}+ m^{2/3}n^{1/3}s^{1/3} + m + n\right)$$ (in the precise statement, the constant of proportionality of the first and third terms depends, in a rather weak manner, on the relation between $m$ and $n$). This bound, originally obtained by Guth and Katz~\cite{GK2} as a major step in their solution of Erd{\H o}s's distinct distances problem, is also a major new result in incidence geometry, an area that has picked up considerable momentum in the past six years. Its original proof uses fairly involved machinery from algebraic and differential geometry, so it is highly desirable to simplify the proof, in the interest of better understanding the geometric structure of the problem, and providing new tools for tackling similar problems. This has recently been undertaken by Guth~\cite{Gu14}. The present paper presents a different and simpler derivation, with better bounds than those in \cite{Gu14}, and without the restrictive assumptions made there. Our result has a potential for applications to other incidence problems in higher dimensions

Dominance Product and High-Dimensional Closest Pair under L∞L_\infty

Given a set $S$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the Closest Pair problem is to find a pair of distinct points in $S$ at minimum distance. When $d$ is constant, there are efficient algorithms that solve this problem, and fast approximate solutions for general $d$. However, obtaining an exact solution in very high dimensions seems to be much less understood. We consider the high-dimensional $L_\infty$ Closest Pair problem, where $d=n^r$ for some $r > 0$, and the underlying metric is $L_\infty$. We improve and simplify previous results for $L_\infty$ Closest Pair, showing that it can be solved by a deterministic strongly-polynomial algorithm that runs in $O(DP(n,d)\log n)$ time, and by a randomized algorithm that runs in $O(DP(n,d))$ expected time, where $DP(n,d)$ is the time bound for computing the {\em dominance product} for $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$. That is a matrix $D$, such that $D[i,j] = \bigl| \{k \mid p_i[k] \leq p_j[k]\} \bigr|$; this is the number of coordinates at which $p_j$ dominates $p_i$. For integer coordinates from some interval $[-M, M]$, we obtain an algorithm that runs in $\tilde{O}\left(\min\{Mn^{\omega(1,r,1)},\, DP(n,d)\}\right)$ time, where $\omega(1,r,1)$ is the exponent of multiplying an $n \times n^r$ matrix by an $n^r \times n$ matrix. We also give slightly better bounds for $DP(n,d)$, by using more recent rectangular matrix multiplication bounds. Computing the dominance product itself is an important task, since it is applied in many algorithms as a major black-box ingredient, such as algorithms for APBP (all pairs bottleneck paths), and variants of APSP (all pairs shortest paths)

Output-Sensitive Tools for Range Searching in Higher Dimensions

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in ${\mathbb R}^{d}$. A point $p \in P$ is $k$\emph{-shallow} if it lies in a halfspace which contains at most $k$ points of $P$ (including $p$). We show that if all points of $P$ are $k$-shallow, then $P$ can be partitioned into $\Theta(n/k)$ subsets, so that any hyperplane crosses at most $O((n/k)^{1-1/(d-1)} \log^{2/(d-1)}(n/k))$ subsets. Given such a partition, we can apply the standard construction of a spanning tree with small crossing number within each subset, to obtain a spanning tree for the point set $P$, with crossing number $O(n^{1-1/(d-1)}k^{1/d(d-1)} \log^{2/(d-1)}(n/k))$. This allows us to extend the construction of Har-Peled and Sharir \cite{hs11} to three and higher dimensions, to obtain, for any set of $n$ points in ${\mathbb R}^{d}$ (without the shallowness assumption), a spanning tree $T$ with {\em small relative crossing number}. That is, any hyperplane which contains $w \leq n/2$ points of $P$ on one side, crosses $O(n^{1-1/(d-1)}w^{1/d(d-1)} \log^{2/(d-1)}(n/w))$ edges of $T$. Using a similar mechanism, we also obtain a data structure for halfspace range counting, which uses $O(n \log \log n)$ space (and somewhat higher preprocessing cost), and answers a query in time $O(n^{1-1/(d-1)}k^{1/d(d-1)} (\log (n/k))^{O(1)})$, where $k$ is the output size