14 research outputs found
Framing the challenge of climate change in Nature and Science editorials
Through their editorialising practices, leading international science journals such as Nature and Science interpret the changing roles of science in society and exert considerable influence on scientific priorities and practices. Here we examine nearly 500 editorials published in these two journals between 1966 and 2016 which deal with climate change, thereby constructing a lens through which to view the changing engagement of science and scientists with the issue. A systematic longitudinal frame analysis reveals broad similarities between Nature and Science in the waxing and waning of editorialising attention given to the topic. But although both journals have diversified how they frame the challenges of climate change, they have done so in different ways. We attribute these differences to three influences: the different political and epistemic cultures into which they publish; their different institutional histories; and their different editors and editorial authorship practices
Уральский рабочий. 1942. № 084
'Io trace a path from Pico della Mirandola's Renaissance man to the
Jacobean malcontents of Marston or Webster is to document not an
inflation of hopes for dominion over the natural world, but rather a loss
of confidence in the possibility of control over even human affairs. 'For
I am going into a wilderness, /Where I shall find nor path, nor friendly
clew/To be my guide'.2 The bleak consequences of this lack of direction,
leaving traces through into the Restoration period in England, are
particularly evident in the free will debate: of Milton's angels