The psychological impact of esophageal cancer screening on anxiety and depression in China

ObjectiveThe psychological impact of screening is unclear and has been ignored. This study aimed to evaluate the psychological impact of esophageal cancer (EC) screening on anxiety and depression in China. Materials and methodsA multicenter, population-based study in five high-risk regions of EC was conducted from 2019 to 2020. Residents were recruited and underwent endoscopic screening and then were diagnosed with normal, esophagitis, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and EC. Subjects who did not participate in the screening were referred to as the control group. We surveyed their anxiety and depression levels at baseline and after endoscopy and informed them of different pathological results to evaluate the psychological impact of the screening process. ResultsA total of 2,337 subjects completed all surveys in the screening process (normal: 355, esophagitis: 1,713, LGIN: 213, HGIN: 43 and EC: 13), with 63 controls. The levels of anxiety and depression of screeners were significantly higher than those of controls (P < 0.001). The fluctuation of anxiety and depression showed a "V" pattern in the screening process. The prevalence of anxiety symptoms at baseline, after endoscopy and after knowing the pathological results was 5.6, 0.3, and 3.2%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the corresponding prevalence of depression was 3.6, 0.2, and 2.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). With the aggravation of pathological results, the levels of anxiety and depression increased significantly (P < 0.001), especially in patients informed of HGIN (16.3 and 9.3%) and EC (23.1 and 30.8%). ConclusionParticipation in endoscopic screening may bring short-term adverse psychological effects, especially at baseline and knowing the pathological results. More attention should be given to participants waiting for endoscopic screening. The method of informing the screening results of HGIN and EC should be improved. Further precise screening is needed to concentrate on high-risk groups to reduce the psychological impact of screening

Biological correlates before esophageal cancer screening and after diagnosis

Almost 50% of the world&#39;s esophageal cancer (EC) cases occur in China, and the impact of cancer screening has long been a controversial topic. The study was designed to evaluate the biological correlates of EC screening and subsequent diagnosis in China. Based on the national cohort of esophageal cancer program, a prospective multicenter study in high-risk regions was conducted from 2017 to 2019. 61 participants received twice esophageal endoscopy screening and pathological biopsy successively (with a mean follow-up of 14.03 months). Box-Cox-power transformation and two-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to evaluate hormone cortisol and immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG, IgM) levels in plasma, reflecting their stress, immune function, and biological correlates before screening and after knowing the diagnosis. The median of cortisol, IgA, IgG, and IgM in pre-screening was 15.46 ug/dL, 1.86 g/L, 12.14 g/L, and 0.91 g/L, corresponding value at post-diagnosis was 15.30 ug/dL, 2.00 g/L, 12.79 g/L, and 0.94 g/L, respectively. No significant differences in biological indicators were found between normal and esophagitis and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia before screening and after diagnosis. After normality transformation, cortisol, IgA, IgG and IgM levels were (0.25 +/- 0.04) U/mL, (0.72 +/- 0.13) (g/L), (2.44 +/- 0.22) (g/L) and (0.98 +/- 0.25) (g/L) before screening, (0.25 +/- 0.05) U/mL, (0.70 +/- 0.13) (g/L), (2.48 +/- 0.21) (g/L) and (1.00 +/- 0.25) (g/L) after diagnosis, respectively. Repeated Measures ANOVA showed that the main effects were significant on IgA levels between pre-screening and post-diagnosis (P = 0.019). No interaction effects on biological levels between pre-post screening and esophageal pathology, anxiety states (all P &gt; 0.05). Little biological correlates were found both before screening and after diagnosis. Cortisol and IgA dropped less significantly, while IgM and IgA were increased slightly after diagnosis. Further multi-round longitudinal studies are needed to validate these results.</p

Long‐term anxiety and depression signatures of participants that received esophageal cancer screening: A multicenter population‐based cohort study

Abstract Background Current evidence on the psychological impact of screening and diagnosis of esophageal cancer (EC) is limited and unclear. Methods This multicenter, population‐based, prospective study was conducted in five high‐incidence regions in China from 2017 to 2020. The screened participants were diagnosed as healthy, esophagitis, low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high‐grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), or EC based on pathological biopsy. The psychological impact of the screening was assessed by comparing anxiety and depression symptoms at baseline and follow‐up. Results A total of 1973 individuals were ultimately included, with an average follow‐up of 22.2 months. The prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms in screened population at baseline was 14.3% and 18.4%. The prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms of screeners at follow‐up declined (all p < 0.001). The anxiety (RR [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.30–0.46]) and depression (0.29 [0.24–0.36]) of screeners weakened over time, but the anxiety and depression symptoms was continuous for patients with HGIN and patients with EC. Compared with the participants classified as normal, the RRs(95% CI) of anxiety and depression symptoms were 2.20 (1.10–4.30) and 2.03 (1.07–3.86) for the patients with HGIN and 2.30 (0.82–6.20) and 3.79 (01.71–8.43) for the patients with EC. Conclusion The anxiety and depression symptoms of screeners weakened over time, except in patients with HGIN and EC, for whom it remained lasting and high. Psychological assistance and interventions are urgently needed for individuals who are ready for screening and for those diagnosed as having HGIN or EC

Long-term anxiety and depression signatures of participants that received esophageal cancer screening: A multicenter population-based cohort study

BackgroundCurrent evidence on the psychological impact of screening and diagnosis of esophageal cancer (EC) is limited and unclear. MethodsThis multicenter, population-based, prospective study was conducted in five high-incidence regions in China from 2017 to 2020. The screened participants were diagnosed as healthy, esophagitis, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), or EC based on pathological biopsy. The psychological impact of the screening was assessed by comparing anxiety and depression symptoms at baseline and follow-up. ResultsA total of 1973 individuals were ultimately included, with an average follow-up of 22.2 months. The prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms in screened population at baseline was 14.3% and 18.4%. The prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms of screeners at follow-up declined (all p < 0.001). The anxiety (RR [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.30-0.46]) and depression (0.29 [0.24-0.36]) of screeners weakened over time, but the anxiety and depression symptoms was continuous for patients with HGIN and patients with EC. Compared with the participants classified as normal, the RRs(95% CI) of anxiety and depression symptoms were 2.20 (1.10-4.30) and 2.03 (1.07-3.86) for the patients with HGIN and 2.30 (0.82-6.20) and 3.79 (01.71-8.43) for the patients with EC. ConclusionThe anxiety and depression symptoms of screeners weakened over time, except in patients with HGIN and EC, for whom it remained lasting and high. Psychological assistance and interventions are urgently needed for individuals who are ready for screening and for those diagnosed as having HGIN or EC

The association between depression and esophageal cancer in China: a multicentre population-based study

Background Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the leading contributors to the global burden of cancer, and the underlying mechanism is still unknown. Recently, there has been a growing interest in understanding modifiable psychosocial risk factors, particularly depression, to prevent EC and reduce morbidity and mortality. However, related research is sparse and has been ignored. The study was designed to assess the association between depression and EC in China. Methods From 2017 to 2019, a population-based multicenter study was conducted in high-risk regions of EC. Participants underwent a free endoscopy screening. If the endoscopic results were suspicious, a pathological biopsy was applied to confirm. Depression was measured with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). In addition, information on demographic characteristics and risk factors was collected from participants by trained interviewers using uniform questionnaires. Results After Endoscopy and pathologic diagnosis, 15,936 participants in high-risk regions of EC (ECHRRs) were enrolled, 10,907 (68.44%) of which were diagnosed health, 4048 (25.40%) with esophagitis, 769 (4.83%) with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), 157 (0.99%) with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), and 55 (0.35%) with EC, respectively. The overall prevalence of depression symptoms of participants was 4.16% (health: 4.63%, esophagitis: 2.99%, LGIN: 2.99%, HGIN: 5.73%, and EC: 9.09%). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that the unadjusted OR (95% CI) between depression and each esophageal pathology grades were esophagitis 0.93 (0.92-0.95), LGIN 0.97 (0.94-0.99), HGIN 1.05 (1.00-1.10), and EC 1.04 (0.97-1.14), respectively. However, after adjustment for potential confounders (age, gender, region, alcohol consumption, BMI), no statistically significant associations between depression and EC (adjusted OR = 1.10, 0.99-1.21) and esophageal lesions (esophagitis: adjusted OR = 1.02, 0.99-1.04; LGIN: adjusted OR = 0.98, 0.95-1.01; HGIN: adjusted OR = 1.04, 0.98-1.11) were observed in this study. Conclusions No significant association was observed between depression and EC in the study. Future prospective cohort studies are needed to verify this preliminary finding

The association between anxiety and esophageal cancer: A nationwide population-based study

Objective Research on generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and its association with esophageal cancer (EC) is sparse. The study aimed to explore the association between GAD and EC. Methods A multicenter, population-based study in high-risk regions for EC (ECHRRs) was conducted from 2017 to 2019. All participants received free endoscopy screening. If the esophageal endoscopy results were suspicious, the pathological biopsy was performed to confirm normal, esophagitis, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), and EC. Information on participants&#39; exposure to risk factors was collected. GAD was assessed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7. Results With esophageal endoscopy, 25,650 participants in ECHRRs were examined, 9586 of whom were suspicious and confirmed by esophageal pathology. The detection rate of EC and precancerous lesions was 6.83% (1751/25,650), with 1377 LGIN (5.37%), 272 HGIN (1.06%), and 102 EC (0.40%) cases. The overall mean GAD score (95% CI) and prevalence among 25,650 participants with endoscopy were 1.96 (1.93-1.99) and 16.90%, respectively. The mean GAD score and prevalence among 9586 participants with pathology were 1.96 (1.91-2.02) and 17.98%, respectively. The mean GAD scores of patients confirmed with normal, esophagitis, LGIN, HGIN, and EC were 1.73 (1.62-1.85), 1.91 (1.85-1.97), 1.94 (1.80-2.08), 3.98 (3.73-4.23). and 2.97 (2.49-3.45), respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The corresponding prevalence of GAD were 5.21%, 18.72%, 17.72%, 43.75%, and 36.27%, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The age- and gender-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) between GAD and each esophageal lesion type were 1.02 (0.99-1.04), 1.01 (0.98-1.04), 1.27 (1.21-1.33), and 1.16 (1.08-1.24), respectively. The ORs (95% CIs) of the positive associations were 1.08 (1.05-1.12), 1.03 (0.99-1.07), 1.35 (1.29-1.42), and 1.19 (1.10-1.29) after further adjustment for potential confounders (all p &lt; 0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed that the positive association persisted. Conclusions GAD was significantly higher in patients with EC and precancerous lesions. Focusing on and alleviating anxiety in high-risk groups (including patients with HGIN and EC) may be an effective strategy for EC prevention and control. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the results.</p