7 research outputs found

    In vivo imaging of prodromal hippocampus CA1 subfield oxidative stress in models of Alzheimer disease and Angelman syndrome

    Full text link
    Hippocampus oxidative stress is considered pathogenic in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease (AD), and in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as Angelman syndrome (AS). Yet clinical benefits of antioxidant treatment for these diseases remain unclear because conventional imaging methods are unable to guide management of therapies in specific hippocampus subfields in vivo that underlie abnormal behavior. Excessive production of paramagnetic free radicals in nonhippocampus brain tissue can be measured in vivo as a greaterâ thanâ normal 1/T1 that is quenchable with antioxidant as measured by quenchâ assisted (Quest) MRI. Here, we further test this approach in phantoms, and we present proofâ ofâ concept data in models of ADâ like and AS hippocampus oxidative stress that also exhibit impaired spatial learning and memory. ADâ like models showed an abnormal gradient along the CA1 dorsalâ ventral axis of excessive free radical production as measured by Quest MRI, and redoxâ sensitive calcium dysregulation as measured by manganeseâ enhanced MRI and electrophysiology. In the AS model, abnormally high free radical levels were observed in dorsal and ventral CA1. Quest MRI is a promising in vivo paradigm for bridging brain subâ field oxidative stress and behavior in animal models and in human patients to better manage antioxidant therapy in devastating neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases.â Berkowitz, B. A., Lenning J., Khetarpal, N., Tran, C., Wu, J. Y., Berri, A. M., Dernay, K., Haacke, E. M., Shafieâ Khorassani, F., Podolsky, R. H., Gant, J. C., Maimaiti, S., Thibault, O., Murphy, G. G., Bennett, B. M., Roberts, R. In vivo imaging of prodromal hippocampus CA1 subfield oxidative stress in models of Alzheimer disease and Angelman syndrome. FASEB J. 31, 4179â 4186 (2017). www.fasebj.orgâ Berkowitz, Bruce A., Lenning, Jacob, Khetarpal, Nikita, Tran, Catherine, Wu, Johnny Y., Berri, Ali M., Dernay, Kristin, Haacke, E. Mark, Shafieâ Khorassani, Fatema, Podolsky, Robert H., Gant, John C., Maimaiti, Shaniya, Thibault, Olivier, Murphy, Geoffrey G., Bennett, Brian M., Roberts, Robin, In vivo imaging of prodromal hippocampus CA1 subfield oxidative stress in models of Alzheimer disease and Angelman syndrome. FASEB J. 31, 4179â 4186 (2017)Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154241/1/fsb2fj201700229r.pd

    Incorporating Covariates into Measures of Surrogate Paradox Risk

    No full text
    Clinical trials often collect intermediate or surrogate endpoints other than their true endpoint of interest. It is important that the treatment effect on the surrogate endpoint accurately predicts the treatment effect on the true endpoint. There are settings in which the proposed surrogate endpoint is positively correlated with the true endpoint, but the treatment has opposite effects on the surrogate and true endpoints, a phenomenon labeled “surrogate paradox”. Covariate information may be useful in predicting an individual’s risk of surrogate paradox. In this work, we propose methods for incorporating covariates into measures of assessing the risk of surrogate paradox using the meta-analytic causal association framework. The measures calculate the probability that a treatment will have opposite effects on the surrogate and true endpoints and determine the size of a positive treatment effect on the surrogate endpoint that would reduce the risk of a negative treatment effect on the true endpoint as a function of covariates, allowing the effects of covariates on the surrogate and true endpoint to vary across trials

    Data Integration Methods for Time-to-Event Outcomes and Measuring the Risk of Surrogate Paradox in Sub-Populations

    Full text link
    This dissertation proposes methods for leveraging existing data sources to answer new public health research questions in two different areas. In the first project we develop methods for validating surrogate outcomes when there is data available on several prior trials of the same surrogate and true outcome combination. In the second and third project, we develop methods for data fusion using time-to-event outcomes motivated by studying the factors associated with in mortality from head and neck cancer. Clinical trials often collect intermediate or surrogate endpoints other than the true endpoint of interest. There are settings in which the proposed surrogate endpoint is positively correlated with the true endpoint, but the treatment has opposite effects on the surrogate and true endpoints, a phenomenon labeled “surrogate paradox”. Covariate information may be useful in predicting an individual’s risk of surrogate paradox. In the first project, we consider the issue of validating surrogate outcomes. We propose methods for incorporating covariate information into measures of assessing the risk of surrogate paradox using the meta-analytic causal association framework. The measures calculate the probability that a treatment will have opposite effects on the surrogate and true endpoints and determine the size of a true positive treatment effect on the surrogate endpoint that would reduce the risk of a negative treatment effect on the true endpoint as a function of covariates, allowing the effects of the covariates on the surrogate and true endpoint to vary across trials. In the second project, we develop methods for data-fusion with a time-to-event outcome with the goal of combining information from two separate data sources, one of which includes the outcome of interest, and the other which includes a set of important confounders. Some existing missing data methods have been extended to this data fusion setting, but they do not allow for censored time-to-event outcomes. To develop data fusion methods for time-to-event outcomes we use the equivalence between the likelihoods of a proportional hazards model with piece-wise constant baseline hazards on pre-specified intervals of follow-up and a Poisson log-linear likelihood using transformed data with pseudo-observations for each combination of individual and interval. This project is motivated by studying the factors associated with racial disparities in cancer mortality. Many factors may confound the association between race and cancer-specific mortality, including healthcare access, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. Existing national cancer surveillance databases each collect parts of this information. When estimating disparities in cancer mortality, using the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry means excluding information on important confounders like hospital type, insurance status, and comorbidities. On the other hand, the National Cancer Database (NCDB), which does provide information on those variables, excludes cause-of-death information, making it impossible to estimate cancer-specific mortality. Integrating data from both sources allows us to study associations between race and cancer-specific mortality adjusted for important confounders. In the third project, we extend the methods from the second project to propose data fusion methods for multiple data sources, when no single dataset contains both the outcome and all the covariates of interest. We provide estimating equations for data fusion with normal or time-to-event outcomes and compare two estimation procedures. We apply the methods to study mortality from head and neck cancer using data from a University of Michigan cohort study combined with data from SEER and NCDB.PhDBiostatisticsUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/177737/1/fshafie_1.pd

    Patterns of poly tobacco use among adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, 2013-2017: A multistate Markov transition analysis

    No full text
    Background: A better understanding of sociodemographic transition patterns between single, dual and poly tobacco product use may help improve tobacco control policy interventions. Methods: HRs of transition between never, non-current (no past 30-day use), cigarette, e-cigarette, other combustible, smokeless tobacco (SLT), dual and poly tobacco use states in adults were estimated for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education and income using a multistate model for waves 1-4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study (2013-2017), a US-based cohort study, accounting for complex survey design. Results: Sole cigarette and SLT use were persistent, with 77% and 78% of adults continuing use after one wave. Other use states were more transient, with 29%-48% of adults reporting the same pattern after one wave. If single-product users transitioned, it was most likely to non-current use while dual or poly cigarette users were most likely to transition to exclusive cigarette use. Males were more likely than females to initiate combustible product use after a history of no use, and after a period of tobacco use cessation. Hispanic and non-Hispanic black participants initiated cigarette use at higher rates than non-Hispanic white participants, and had higher rates of experimentation with tobacco products between study waves. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher rates of transition into combustible tobacco use. Conclusions: Dual and poly tobacco use is largely transient, while single-use patterns are more stable over time. Transitions differ by age, sex, race/ethnicity, education and income, which may influence the impact of current and future tobacco control efforts
    corecore