38 research outputs found

    Course of soft tissue injuries in the transtibial amputation residuum

    No full text
    A transtibial amputation (ITA) prosthetic user has to deal with daily complications associated with his artificial limb. Though highly progressed, technologically and functionally, the TTA prosthesis is far from ideally replacing an intact limb, mainly due to unique inherent anatomy. After a long and complicated fitting process, the prosthetic limb is often a source of gait abnormalities, limb pain and soft tissue breakdown. While commercial prosthetic accessories and aids are plentiful, tools that analyze the mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of the residual limb during load-bearing are scarce. Therefore, clinicians are not well-equipped with tools that are able to quantify the effectiveness of socket rectification and the use of aids, e.g. liners and thigh corset. In this review we will discuss TTA aetiology and elaborate on the prostheses that are most commonly used today. We will also review gait characteristic and its associated complications. Mainly, we will discuss socket limb interaction and methods for quantifying the internal mechanical conditions in the residual limb for the purpose of preventing deep tissue injuries

    Scaffolds for knee chondral and osteochondral defects : indications for different clinical scenarios. A consensus statement

    No full text
    Objective To develop patient-focused consensus guidelines on the indications for the use of scaffolds to address chondral and osteochondral femoral condyle lesions. Design The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) was used to develop patient-specific recommendations by combining the best available scientific evidence with the collective judgement of a panel of experts guided by a core panel and multidisciplinary discussers. A list of specific clinical scenarios was produced regarding adult patients with symptomatic lesions without instability, malalignment, or meniscal deficiency. Each scenario underwent discussion and a 2-round vote on a 9-point Likert-type scale (range 1-3 "inappropriate," 4-6 "uncertain," 7-9 "appropriate"). Scores were pooled to generate expert recommendations. Results Scaffold (chondral vs. osteochondral), patient characteristics (age and sport activity level), and lesion characteristics (etiology, size, and the presence of osteoarthritis [OA]) were considered to define 144 scenarios. The use of scaffold-based procedures was considered appropriate in all cases of chondral or osteochondral lesions when joints are not affected by OA, while OA joints presented more controversial results. The analysis of the evaluated factors showed a different weight in influencing treatment appropriateness: the presence of OA influenced 58.3% of the indications, while etiology, size, and age were discriminating factors in 54.2%, 29.2%, and 16.7% of recommendations, respectively. Conclusions The consensus identified indications still requiring investigation, but also the convergence of the experts in several scenarios defined appropriate or inappropriate, which could support decision making in the daily clinical practice, guiding the use of scaffold-based procedures for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral knee defects
    corecore