16 research outputs found

    Risk Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among US Healthcare Personnel, May-December 2020

    Get PDF
    To determine risk factors for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) among US healthcare personnel (HCP), we conducted a case-control analysis. We collected data about activities outside the workplace and COVID-19 patient care activities from HCP with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test results (cases) and from HCP with negative test results (controls) in healthcare facilities in 5 US states. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate adjusted matched odds ratios and 95% CIs for exposures. Among 345 cases and 622 controls, factors associated with risk were having close contact with persons with COVID-19 outside the workplace, having close contact with COVID-19 patients in the workplace, and assisting COVID-19 patients with activities of daily living. Protecting HCP from COVID-19 may require interventions that reduce their exposures outside the workplace and improve their ability to more safely assist COVID-19 patients with activities of daily living

    Understanding Community-Dwelling Older Adults’ Experiences of Dysphagia and a Texture-Modified Diet

    No full text
    Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Rochester. School of Nursing. Dept. of Health Practice Research, 2016.Purpose: Community-dwelling older adults with dysphagia may not receive the dysphagia care and follow-up to the extent that older adults who live in institutional settings do. The medical outcomes of dysphagia for older adults are poor and the effects of aging on swallowing and the negative effects of dysphagia are well documented. However, to date, there is limited knowledge about how dysphagia and texture-modified diets affect the lives of community-dwelling older adults. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore community-dwelling older adults’ experiences of dysphagia and the need to eat a restrictive texture-modified diet of pureed foods and/or thickened liquids. Methods: Using an interpretive descriptive research design (Thorne, 2008) and maximum variation purposeful sampling, 20 participants were recruited from four local hospitals and a home-care agency. Data collection included two in-depth interviews, participant observation during a meal, field-notes, memos, and relevant data from the participants’ dysphagia reports and/or medical records. Constant comparison was used and data collection and analysis were iterative. Meaning units and codes were identified and synthesized into four themes. Results: Four themes were identified: (1) choosing between eating or breathing is frightening, (2) hiding dysphagia symptoms from the public eye is important to preserve self-identity, (3) following the diet feels like life is “falling apart,” and (4) adhering to the diet is not an “all or none” phenomenon. Participants perceived the impact of dysphagia and a texture-modified diet on their lives to be a disruption, an interruption, or one where they acquiesced to the changes to their lives. Their levels of tolerance of the diet ranged from intolerance to tolerance and acceptance. The interactions between the perceptions on the impact on their lives and the levels of diet tolerance resulted in stable and changing experiences over time. Conclusion: Dysphagia and texture-modified diets affect community-dwelling older adults in multiple ways that may need to be considered by clinicians who work with this population. Clinicians may need to go beyond adherence to recommended diets and consider the broader social and psychological contexts of the lives of community dwelling older adults

    Patient Perspectives on Accessing Acute Illness Care

    No full text
    Introduction: Older adults use the emergency department (ED) at high rates, including for illnesses that could be managed by their primary care providers (PCP). Policymakers have implemented barriers and incentives, often financial, to try to modify use patterns but with limited success. This study aims to understand the factors that influence older adults’ decision to obtain acute illness care from the ED rather than from their PCPs. Methods: We performed a qualitative study using a directed content analysis approach from February to October 2013. Fifteen community-dwelling older adults age≥65 years who presented to the ED of an academic medical center hospital for care and who were discharged home were enrolled. Semi-structured interviews were conducted initially in the ED and subsequently in patients’ homes over the following six weeks. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, verified, and coded. The study team jointly analyzed the data and identified themes that emerged from the interviews. Results: The average age of study participants was 74 years (standard deviation ±7.2 years); 53% were female; 80% were white. We found five themes that influenced participants’ decisions to obtain acute illness care from the ED: limited availability of PCP-based care, variable interactions with healthcare providers and systems, limited availability of transportation for illness care, desire to avoid burdening friends and family, and previous experiences with illnesses. Conclusion: Community-dwelling older adults integrate multiple factors when deciding to obtain care from an ED rather than their PCPs. These factors relate to personal and social considerations, practical issues, and individual perceptions based on previous experiences. If these findings are validated in confirmatory studies, policymakers wishing to modify where older adults receive care should consider person-centered interventions at the system and individual level, such as decision support, telemedicine, improved transport services, enhancing PCPs’ capabilities, and enhancing EDs’ resources to care for older patients

    Patient Perspectives on Accessing Acute Illness Care

    No full text
    Introduction: Older adults use the emergency department (ED) at high rates, including for illnesses that could be managed by their primary care providers (PCP). Policymakers have implemented barriers and incentives, often financial, to try to modify use patterns but with limited success. This study aims to understand the factors that influence older adults’ decision to obtain acute illness care from the ED rather than from their PCPs. Methods: We performed a qualitative study using a directed content analysis approach from February to October 2013. Fifteen community-dwelling older adults age≥65 years who presented to the ED of an academic medical center hospital for care and who were discharged home were enrolled. Semi-structured interviews were conducted initially in the ED and subsequently in patients’ homes over the following six weeks. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, verified, and coded. The study team jointly analyzed the data and identified themes that emerged from the interviews. Results: The average age of study participants was 74 years (standard deviation ±7.2 years); 53% were female; 80% were white. We found five themes that influenced participants’ decisions to obtain acute illness care from the ED: limited availability of PCP-based care, variable interactions with healthcare providers and systems, limited availability of transportation for illness care, desire to avoid burdening friends and family, and previous experiences with illnesses. Conclusion: Community-dwelling older adults integrate multiple factors when deciding to obtain care from an ED rather than their PCPs. These factors relate to personal and social considerations, practical issues, and individual perceptions based on previous experiences. If these findings are validated in confirmatory studies, policymakers wishing to modify where older adults receive care should consider person-centered interventions at the system and individual level, such as decision support, telemedicine, improved transport services, enhancing PCPs’ capabilities, and enhancing EDs’ resources to care for older patients

    Patient Perspectives on Accessing Acute Illness Care

    No full text
    Introduction: Older adults use the emergency department (ED) at high rates, including for illnesses that could be managed by their primary care providers (PCP). Policymakers have implemented barriers and incentives, often financial, to try to modify use patterns but with limited success. This study aims to understand the factors that influence older adults’ decision to obtain acute illness care from the ED rather than from their PCPs. Methods: We performed a qualitative study using a directed content analysis approach from February to October 2013. Fifteen community-dwelling older adults age≥65 years who presented to the ED of an academic medical center hospital for care and who were discharged home were enrolled. Semi-structured interviews were conducted initially in the ED and subsequently in patients’ homes over the following six weeks. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, verified, and coded. The study team jointly analyzed the data and identified themes that emerged from the interviews. Results: The average age of study participants was 74 years (standard deviation ±7.2 years); 53% were female; 80% were white. We found five themes that influenced participants’ decisions to obtain acute illness care from the ED: limited availability of PCP-based care, variable interactions with healthcare providers and systems, limited availability of transportation for illness care, desire to avoid burdening friends and family, and previous experiences with illnesses.  Conclusion: Community-dwelling older adults integrate multiple factors when deciding to obtain care from an ED rather than their PCPs. These factors relate to personal and social considerations, practical issues, and individual perceptions based on previous experiences. If these findings are validated in confirmatory studies, policymakers wishing to modify where older adults receive care should consider person-centered interventions at the system and individual level, such as decision support, telemedicine, improved transport services, enhancing PCPs’ capabilities, and enhancing EDs’ resources to care for older patients.
    corecore