Comparisons of the clinical outcomes and subjective satisfaction according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups in all participants.

<p>Comparisons among BMI groups are analyzed by the linear by linear association analysis.</p><p>Comparisons of the clinical outcomes and subjective satisfaction according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups in all participants.</p

Intraoperative and postoperative complications according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups.

<p>^aOne or more complications were experienced by 53 women, resulting in an aggregate of 63 recorded complications.</p><p>^bUrinary retention was determined when the patient failed to void after surgery or the volume of PVR was over 300ml after surgery. In these cases, clean intermittent self-catheterization was performed temporarily; however, three patients eventually required the procedure for the release of tape tension.</p><p>Comparisons among BMI groups are analyzed by the linear by linear association analysis.</p><p>Intraoperative and postoperative complications according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups.</p

Comparisons of the clinical outcomes and subjective satisfaction according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups in patients with either the retropubic or transobturator approach.

<p>Comparisons among BMI groups are analyzed by the linear by linear association analysis.</p><p>Comparisons of the clinical outcomes and subjective satisfaction according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups in patients with either the retropubic or transobturator approach.</p

Demographic and urodynamic characteristics according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups.

<p>Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error or as the number (%).</p><p>Comparisons among BMI groups are analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance with Scheffe's method for multiple comparisons or linear by linear association depending on the types of variables.</p><p>^a,b, and ^cThe same letters indicate non-significant difference.</p><p>^dCo-morbid diseases included hypertension, diabetes, hepatic disease, respiratory disease, and cardiovascular disease that were controlled by medication.</p><p>^eBased on the Stamey classification; Grade I: women who lose urine only with coughing, sneezing, or lifting heavy objects, Grade II: women who lose urine with minimal activity such as walking or arising from the sitting position, Grade III: women who are totally incontinent in the upright position and who cannot hold urine in their bladders.</p><p>Demographic and urodynamic characteristics according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups.</p

Seoul National University prostate cancer risk nomogram for prostate cancer probability prediction in Korean men.

<p>Seoul National University prostate cancer risk nomogram for prostate cancer probability prediction in Korean men.</p

Decision curve analysis for the calculators evaluated.

<p>The Seoul National University prostate cancer risk calculator, European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator, and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator were analyzed.</p

Seoul National University prostate cancer calculator (Version 1.1).

<p>(A) Main entry page of the calculator, (B) Selection page for “Prostate cancer risk calculator” or “Prostate cancer stage calculator”, and (C) Example of “Seoul National University prostate cancer risk calculator”.</p

Comparisons of the percent of subjects with mixed urinary incontinence according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups in patients with either approach.

<p>Comparisons among BMI groups are analyzed by the linear by linear association analysis.</p><p>Comparisons of the percent of subjects with mixed urinary incontinence according to the body mass index (kg/m²) groups in patients with either approach.</p

Univariate logistic regression analyses and the final multivariate logistic regression model in the development cohort.

<p>CI: confidence interval, DRE: digital rectal examination, OR: Odds ratio, TRUS: transrectal ultrasonography.</p

The receiver operating characteristic curves for the different calculators evaluated.

<p>Seoul National University prostate cancer risk calculator, European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator, and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator Were compared using the DeLong method.</p