37 research outputs found
Association between tranexamic acid administration and mortality based on the trauma phenotype: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan
Tachino J., Seno S., Matsumoto H., et al. Association between tranexamic acid administration and mortality based on the trauma phenotype: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan. Critical Care 28, 89 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04871-w.Background: In trauma systems, criteria for individualised and optimised administration of tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic, are yet to be established. This study used nationwide cohort data from Japan to evaluate the association between TXA and in-hospital mortality among all patients with blunt trauma based on clinical phenotypes (trauma phenotypes). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) spanning 2019 to 2021. Results: Of 80,463 patients with trauma registered in the JTDB, 53,703 met the inclusion criteria, and 8046 (15.0%) received TXA treatment. The patients were categorised into eight trauma phenotypes. After adjusting with inverse probability treatment weighting, in-hospital mortality of the following trauma phenotypes significantly reduced with TXA administration: trauma phenotype 1 (odds ratio [OR] 0.68 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.81]), trauma phenotype 2 (OR 0.73 [0.66–0.81]), trauma phenotype 6 (OR 0.52 [0.39–0.70]), and trauma phenotype 8 (OR 0.67 [0.60–0.75]). Conversely, trauma phenotypes 3 (OR 2.62 [1.98–3.47]) and 4 (OR 1.39 [1.11–1.74]) exhibited a significant increase in in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the association between TXA administration and survival outcomes based on clinical phenotypes. We found an association between trauma phenotypes and in-hospital mortality, indicating that treatment with TXA could potentially influence this relationship. Further studies are needed to assess the usefulness of these phenotypes. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.
筋機能的磁気共鳴画像法を用いた股関節外転運動後の股関節外転筋群の継時的な筋活動の変化
The hip abductor muscles play an important role in postural control. Structural differences in the hip abductor muscles translate to differences in functional activity. This study sought to measure changes in T2 values of the hip abductors after hip abduction exercise over time and to identify variations in activity between the different hip abductor muscle groups. Ten healthy young men (mean age 28.4 [24−32] years) performed 5 sets of 40 repetitions of a hip abduction exercise at 30% maximum voluntary contraction with the right leg. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before exercise, at intervals during exercise, and at the end of exercise. Subsequently, T2 values were measured for the tensor fasciae latae, gluteus minimus, the anterior, middle, and posterior segments of the gluteus medius, and the upper fibers of the gluteus maximus. T2 values for the gluteus minimus, tensor fasciae latae, and the anterior and middle segments of the gluteus medius were significantly higher at after all exercise compared with before exercise. However, T2 values for the posterior segments of the gluteus medius after 3, 4, and 5 sets of exercise were significantly higher than before exercise. T2 values for the upper fibers of the gluteus maximus after 4 and 5 sets were significantly higher than before exercise. Thus, the variable changes in muscle activity observed in this study were attributable to differences in anatomic structure and reflected intramuscular variation in activity between the hip abductor muscles.首都大学東京学位論文甲第959号副論
Enhancing evidence-informed policymaking in medicine and healthcare: stakeholder involvement in the Commons Project for rare diseases in Japan
Kogetsu A., Isono M., Aikyo T., et al. Enhancing evidence-informed policymaking in medicine and healthcare: stakeholder involvement in the Commons Project for rare diseases in Japan. Research Involvement and Engagement 9, 107 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00515-5.Background: Although stakeholder involvement in policymaking is attracting attention in the fields of medicine and healthcare, a practical methodology has not yet been established. Rare-disease policy, specifically research priority setting for the allocation of limited research resources, is an area where evidence generation through stakeholder involvement is expected to be effective. We generated evidence for rare-disease policymaking through stakeholder involvement and explored effective collaboration among stakeholders. Methods: We constructed a space called ‘Evidence-generating Commons’, where patients, family members, researchers, and former policymakers can share their knowledge and experiences and engage in continual deliberations on evidence generation. Ten rare diseases were consequently represented. In the ‘Commons’, 25 consecutive workshops were held predominantly online, from 2019 to 2021. These workshops focused on (1) clarification of difficulties faced by rare-disease patients, (2) development and selection of criteria for priority setting, and (3) priority setting through the application of the criteria. For the first step, an on-site workshop using sticky notes was held. The data were analysed based on KJ method. For the second and third steps, workshops on specific themes were held to build consensus. The workshop agendas and methods were modified based on participants’ feedback. Results: The ‘Commons’ was established with 43 participants, resulting in positive effects such as capacity building, opportunities for interactions, mutual understanding, and empathy among the participants. The difficulties faced by patients with rare diseases were classified into 10 categories. Seven research topics were identified as priority issues to be addressed including ‘impediments to daily life’, ‘financial burden’, ‘anxiety’, and ‘burden of hospital visits’. This was performed by synthesising the results of the application of the two criteria that were particularly important to strengthen future research on rare diseases. We also clarified high-priority research topics by using criteria valued more by patients and family members than by researchers and former policymakers, and criteria with specific perspectives. Conclusion: We generated evidence for policymaking in the field of rare diseases. This study’s insights into stakeholder involvement can enhance evidence-informed policymaking. We engaged in comprehensive discussions with policymakers regarding policy implementation and planned analysis of the participants’ experiences in this project
Changes in Structural Neural Networks in the Recovery Process of Motor Paralysis after Stroke
In recent years, neurorehabilitation has been actively used to treat motor paralysis after stroke. However, the impacts of rehabilitation on neural networks in the brain remain largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated changes in structural neural networks after rehabilitation therapy in patients who received a combination of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) and intensive occupational therapy (intensive-OT) as neurorehabilitation. Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) for upper extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), both of which reflected upper limb motor function, were conducted before and after rehabilitation therapy. At the same time, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging (3D T1WI) were performed. After analyzing the structural connectome based on DTI data, measures related to connectivity in neural networks were calculated using graph theory. Rehabilitation therapy prompted a significant increase in connectivity with the isthmus of the cingulate gyrus in the ipsilesional hemisphere (p p < 0.05). These results indicate that LF-rTMS combined with intensive-OT may facilitate motor function recovery by enhancing the functional roles of networks in motor-related areas of the ipsilesional cerebral hemisphere