Unfinished Decolonisation and Globalisation

This article locates John Darwin’s work on decolonisation within an Oxbridge tradition which portrays a British world system, of which formal empire was but one part, emerging to increasing global dominance from the early nineteenth century. In this mental universe, decolonisation was the mirror image of that expanding global power. According to this point of view, it was not the sloughing off of individual territories, but rather the shrinking away of the system and of the international norms that supported it, until only its ghost remained by the end of the 1960s. The article then asks, echoing the title of Darwin’s Unfinished Empire, whether the decolonisation project is all but complete, or still ongoing. In addition, what is the responsibility of the imperial historian to engage with, inform, or indeed refrain from, contemporary debates that relate to some of these issues? The answer is twofold. On the one hand, the toolkit that the Oxbridge tradition and Darwin provide remains relevant, and also useful in thinking about contemporary issues such as China’s move towards being a global power, the United States’ declining hegemony, and some states and groups desires to rearticulate their relationship with the global. On the other hand, the decline of world systems of power needs to be recognised as just one of several types of, and approaches to, analysing ‘decolonisation’. One which cannot be allowed to ignore or marginalise the study of others, such as experience, first nations issues, the shaping of the postcolonial state, and empire legacies. The article concludes by placing the Oxbridge tradition into a broader typology of types and methodologies of decolonisation, and by asking what a new historiography of decolonisation might look like. It suggests that it would address the Oxbridge concern with the lifecycles of systems of power and their relationship to global changes, but also place them alongside, and in dialogue with, a much broader set of perspectives and analytical approaches

James A. Anderson & John K. Whitmore (éd.), China’s Encounters on the South and Southwest: Reforging the Fiery Frontier over Two Millennia, Leiden, Brill, 2015.

Sen Tansen. James A. Anderson & John K. Whitmore (éd.), China’s Encounters on the South and Southwest: Reforging the Fiery Frontier over Two Millennia, Leiden, Brill, 2015.. In: Bulletin de l'Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient. Tome 106, 2020. pp. 553-557

Monks and merchants: Sino-Indian relations, 618–1281

The period between ninth and tenth centuries witnessed dramatic changes in Indian and Chinese societies. These changes transformed the nature of Sino-Indian contacts from a religion dominated intercourse to one that had greater emphasis on trade and commerce. Merchants replaced Buddhist monks as main players in bilateral relations, non-religious items started occupying a larger share of Indian exports to China, and maritime route between the two countries became more popular than the overland route. These changes led to the exchange of new ideas and sustained mutual understanding and influences during, what can be termed as, the Golden Age of Sino-Indian relations

Buddhism, diplomacy, and trade : the realignment of Sino-Indian relations, 600-1400

Includes bibliographical references (p. [329]-371) and index.xvi, 388 p. ill., maps 24 c