Hybrid media consumption: How tweeting during a televised political debate influences the vote decision

An increasing number of people are using microblogs to broadcast their thoughts in real time as they watch televised political events. Microblogging social network sites (SNSs) such as Twitter generate a parallel stream of information and opinion. It is presumed that the additional content enhances the viewing experience, but our experiment explores the validity of this assumption. We studied how tweeting, or passively observing Twitter during a debate, influenced affect, recall and vote decision. For most measures, participants’ average feeling and recall toward the candidates did not depend on Twitter activity, but Twitter activity did matter for vote choice. People who actively tweeted changed their voting choice to reflect the majority sentiment on Twitter. Results are discussed in terms of the possibility that active tweeting leads to greater engagement but that it may also make people more susceptible to social influence

Social Media, U.S. Presidential Campaigns, and Public Opinion Polls: Disentangling Effects

Political campaigns in the United States routinely use social media as part of their strategic communication. Although digital campaigns have been a topic of scholarly interest for nearly two decades (Bimber and Davis 2003; Foot and Schneider 2006; Stromer-Galley 2014), few studies examine the relationship between public opinion polls and communicative strategies online. Our study fills this gap by looking at how voting intention polls relates to types of campaign messages on social media. We analyze Twitter and Facebook messages of all Republican and Democratic candidates during the surfacing stage and primaries of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. All messages from candidates' campaign accounts are coded via automated text analysis focusing on strategic messaging, including attack and advocacy messages. Using time series analysis, we compare the types of messages candidates produce on social media and their standing in public opinion polls. Our hypothesis is that the candidate's position in the polls will drive certain types of campaign messages for strategic advantage. We predict that time matters. Candidates are sensitive to the opinion climate and adjust strategies in response to their standing in polls. Our results contribute to understanding the relationship between strategic campaign communication on social media and public opinion polling