4 research outputs found

    Alkoxide Migration at a Nickel(II) Center Induced by a π‑Acidic Ligand: Migratory Insertion versus Metal–Ligand Cooperation

    No full text
    Two pathways of alkoxide migration occurring at a nickel­(II) center supported by a PPP ligand (PPP<sup>−</sup> = P­[2-P<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup>) are presented in this Article. In the first route, the addition of a π-acidic ligand to a (PPP)Ni alkoxide species reveals the formation of a P–O bond. This reaction occurs via metal–ligand cooperation (MLC) involving a 2-electron reduction at nickel. To demonstrate a P–O bond formation, a nickel­(II) isopropoxide species (PPP)­Ni­(O<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr) (<b>4</b>) was prepared. Upon addition of a π-acidic isocyanide ligand CN<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu, a nickel(0) isocyanide species (PP<sup>O<i>i</i>Pr</sup>P)­Ni­(CN<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu) (<b>6b</b>) was generated; P–O bond formation occurred via reductive elimination (RE). When CO is present, migratory insertion (MI) occurs instead. The reaction of <b>4</b> with CO­(g) results in the formation of (PPP)­Ni­(COO<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr) (<b>5</b>), representing an alternative pathway. The corresponding RE product (PP<sup>O<i>i</i>Pr</sup>P)­Ni­(CO) (<b>6a</b>) can be independently produced from the substitution reaction of {(PP<sup>O<i>i</i>Pr</sup>P)­Ni}<sub>2</sub>(μ-N<sub>2</sub>) (<b>3</b>) with CO­(g). While two different carbonylation pathways in <b>4</b> seem feasible, C–O bond forming migratory insertion singly occurs. Regeneration of a (PPP)Ni moiety via a P–O bond cleavage was demonstrated by treating <b>3</b> with CO<sub>2</sub>(g). The formation of (PPP)­Ni­(OCOO<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr) (<b>7</b>) clearly shows that an isopropoxide group migrates onto the bound CO<sub>2</sub> ligand, and a P–Ni moiety is regenerated

    Alkoxide Migration at a Nickel(II) Center Induced by a π‑Acidic Ligand: Migratory Insertion versus Metal–Ligand Cooperation

    No full text
    Two pathways of alkoxide migration occurring at a nickel­(II) center supported by a PPP ligand (PPP<sup>−</sup> = P­[2-P<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup>) are presented in this Article. In the first route, the addition of a π-acidic ligand to a (PPP)Ni alkoxide species reveals the formation of a P–O bond. This reaction occurs via metal–ligand cooperation (MLC) involving a 2-electron reduction at nickel. To demonstrate a P–O bond formation, a nickel­(II) isopropoxide species (PPP)­Ni­(O<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr) (<b>4</b>) was prepared. Upon addition of a π-acidic isocyanide ligand CN<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu, a nickel(0) isocyanide species (PP<sup>O<i>i</i>Pr</sup>P)­Ni­(CN<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu) (<b>6b</b>) was generated; P–O bond formation occurred via reductive elimination (RE). When CO is present, migratory insertion (MI) occurs instead. The reaction of <b>4</b> with CO­(g) results in the formation of (PPP)­Ni­(COO<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr) (<b>5</b>), representing an alternative pathway. The corresponding RE product (PP<sup>O<i>i</i>Pr</sup>P)­Ni­(CO) (<b>6a</b>) can be independently produced from the substitution reaction of {(PP<sup>O<i>i</i>Pr</sup>P)­Ni}<sub>2</sub>(μ-N<sub>2</sub>) (<b>3</b>) with CO­(g). While two different carbonylation pathways in <b>4</b> seem feasible, C–O bond forming migratory insertion singly occurs. Regeneration of a (PPP)Ni moiety via a P–O bond cleavage was demonstrated by treating <b>3</b> with CO<sub>2</sub>(g). The formation of (PPP)­Ni­(OCOO<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr) (<b>7</b>) clearly shows that an isopropoxide group migrates onto the bound CO<sub>2</sub> ligand, and a P–Ni moiety is regenerated

    Phosphinite-Ni(0) Mediated Formation of a Phosphide-Ni(II)-OCOOMe Species via Uncommon Metal–Ligand Cooperation

    No full text
    Reversible transformations are observed between a phosphide-nickel­(II) alkoxide and a phosphinite-nickel(0) species via a P–O bond formation coupled with a 2-e<sup>–</sup> redox change at the nickel center. In the forward reaction, the nickel(0) dinitrogen species (PP<sup>OMe</sup>P)­Ni­(N<sub>2</sub>) (<b>2</b>) and {(PP<sup>OMe</sup>P)­Ni}<sub>2</sub>(μ-N<sub>2</sub>) (<b>3</b>) were formed from the reaction of (PPP)­NiCl (<b>1</b>) with a methoxy anion. In the backward reaction, a (PPP)­Ni­(II) moiety was regenerated from the CO<sub>2</sub> reaction of <b>3</b> with the concomitant formation of a methyl carbonate ligand in (PPP)­Ni­(OCOOMe) (<b>7</b>). Thus, unanticipated metal–ligand cooperation involving a phosphide based ligand is reported

    Phosphinite-Ni(0) Mediated Formation of a Phosphide-Ni(II)-OCOOMe Species via Uncommon Metal–Ligand Cooperation

    No full text
    Reversible transformations are observed between a phosphide-nickel­(II) alkoxide and a phosphinite-nickel(0) species via a P–O bond formation coupled with a 2-e<sup>–</sup> redox change at the nickel center. In the forward reaction, the nickel(0) dinitrogen species (PP<sup>OMe</sup>P)­Ni­(N<sub>2</sub>) (<b>2</b>) and {(PP<sup>OMe</sup>P)­Ni}<sub>2</sub>(μ-N<sub>2</sub>) (<b>3</b>) were formed from the reaction of (PPP)­NiCl (<b>1</b>) with a methoxy anion. In the backward reaction, a (PPP)­Ni­(II) moiety was regenerated from the CO<sub>2</sub> reaction of <b>3</b> with the concomitant formation of a methyl carbonate ligand in (PPP)­Ni­(OCOOMe) (<b>7</b>). Thus, unanticipated metal–ligand cooperation involving a phosphide based ligand is reported
    corecore