28 research outputs found

    Modeling Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Increased Efforts to Attract Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Clients Ages 20–29 in Zimbabwe

    No full text
    <div><p>Background</p><p>Zimbabwe aims to increase circumcision coverage to 80% among 13- to 29-year-olds. However, implementation data suggest that high coverage among men ages 20 and older may not be achievable without efforts specifically targeted to these men, incurring additional costs per circumcision. Scale-up scenarios were created based on trends in implementation data in Zimbabwe, and the cost-effectiveness of increasing efforts to recruit clients ages 20–29 was examined.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Zimbabwe voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) program data were used to project trends in male circumcision coverage by age into the future. The projection informed a base scenario in which, by 2018, the country achieves 80% circumcision coverage among males ages 10–19 and lower levels of coverage among men above age 20. The Zimbabwe DMPPT 2.0 model was used to project costs and impacts, assuming a US$109 VMMC unit cost in the base scenario and a 3% discount rate. Two other scenarios assumed that the program could increase coverage among clients ages 20–29 with a corresponding increase in unit cost for these age groups.</p><p>Results</p><p>When circumcision coverage among men ages 20–29 is increased compared with a base scenario reflecting current implementation trends, fewer VMMCs are required to avert one infection. If more than 50% additional effort (reflected as multiplying the unit cost by >1.5) is required to double the increase in coverage among this age group compared with the base scenario, the cost per HIV infection averted is higher than in the base scenario.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Although increased investment in recruiting VMMC clients ages 20–29 may lead to greater overall impact if recruitment efforts are successful, it may also lead to lower cost-effectiveness, depending on the cost of increasing recruitment. Programs should measure the relationship between increased effort and increased ability to attract this age group.</p></div

    Sensitivity Analysis of Unit Cost for Circumcising Males Ages 20–29 in Scenario A<sup>1</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>Sensitivity Analysis of Unit Cost for Circumcising Males Ages 20–29 in Scenario A<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0164144#t003fn001" target="_blank"><sup>1</sup></a>.</p

    Age distribution of VMMC clients compared with the age distribution of potential clients.

    No full text
    <p>VMMC clients are shown in white bars; the age distribution of uncircumcised males in the overall population of 10- to 49-year-old males (potential clients) is shown in black bars.</p

    Reduction in HIV incidence with provision of VMMC to males, by age group, 2014–2050.

    No full text
    <p>The HIV incidence ratio represents the incidence in the scale-up scenario divided by the incidence in a population where circumcision is not scaled up over baseline levels. HIV incidence is in the entire population—males and females. Each line represents the HIV incidence ratio under a scenario in which only the indicated five-year age group is circumcised. In each age group, MC is scaled up to 80% coverage 2014–2018 and maintained at that level from 2018 forward. The dashed vertical line represents a 15-year period from the base year.</p
    corecore