Prevalence and risk factors of self-reported psychotic experiences among high school and college students: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Adolescents are at high risk of incident psychopathology. Fleeting psychotic experiences (PEs) that emerge in young people in response to stress may be warning signs that are missed by research that fails to study stressed populations, such as late high school and college/university students. Our aim in this systematic review was to conduct a meta-analysis that estimates prevalence rates of PEs in students, and to assess whether these rates differ by gender, age, culture, and COVID-19 exposure. We searched nine electronic databases, from their inception until January 31, 2022 for relevant studies. We pooled the estimates using the DerSimonian-Laird technique and random-effects meta-analysis. Our main outcome was the prevalence of self-reported PEs in high school and college/university students. We subsequently analyzed our data by age, gender, population, country, culture, evaluation tool, and COVID-19 exposure. Out of 486 studies retrieved, a total of 59 independent studies met inclusion criteria reporting 210' 024 students from 21 different countries. Nearly one in four students (23.31%; 95% CI 18.41%-29.05%), reported having experienced PEs (heterogeneity [Q = 22,698.23 (62), p = 0.001] τ <sup>2</sup> = 1.4418 [1.0415-2.1391], τ = 1.2007 [1.0205-1.4626], I <sup>2</sup> = 99.7%, H = 19.13 [18.59-19.69]). The 95% prediction intervals were 04.01%-68.85%. Subgroup analyses showed that the pooled prevalence differed significantly by population, culture, and COVID-19 exposure. This meta-analysis revealed high prevalence rates of self-reported PEs among teen and young adult students, which may have significance for mental health screening in school settings. An important realization is that PEs may have very different mental health meaning in different cultures

Therapeutic drug monitoring is useful when pharmacogenetic assessment is unavailable: case report of delusional disorder

Antipsychotic plasma levels have been extensively used in the assessment of poor treatment response, lack of adherence and adverse events in delusional disorder. It has not been used as an indicator of metabolizer status, to determine whether a delusional disorder patient is a poor, intermediate, or ultra-rapid metabolizer of antipsychotics. Pharmacogenetic probes are, of course, the right method for the latter task, but they are not readily available for clinical use. We report the case of a 46-year-old woman with delusional disorder who developed unexpected adverse effects to treatment with relatively low dose risperidone and poor symptomatic response. Blood level monitoring indicated high levels of risperidone and a high concentration-to-dose ratio, which suggested accumulation of unmetabolized risperidone. Paradoxically, extrapyramidal side effects increased when, after reducing the risperidone dose, 5 mg/day of aripiprazole was added. Consequently, the patient was switched to olanzapine 5 mg/day. Sertraline 150 mg/day was later added for comorbid depression. A  complete symptomatic response was achieved. Although other factors may well have been at play, this sequence of events suggests that the patient was a slow metabolizer of CYP2D6, which metabolizes both risperidone and aripiprazole. With pharmacogenetic assessment not available, therapeutic drug monitoring helped clinicians decide on appropriate management