41 research outputs found

    Ruxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator's choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non-relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy

    Short-term femoral venous dialysis catheters for autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection: Retrospective evaluation in 276 catheter practice from a single center

    No full text
    WOS: 000252078300011PubMed ID: 17962077We retrospectively evaluated 276 short-term femoral venous dialysis catheters (STFVCs) used for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). Patients were not given any prophylactic antibiotic or anti-thrombotic therapy. Totally 877 leukapheresis sessions were performed. STFVCs were sufficient for continuous flow rate in all leukapheresis session. Side effects were detected in 30 (10.86%) STFVC practice (ecchymosis and/or hematoma in 13 (4.71%), thrombophlebitis in 5 (1.81%), bleeding in 4 (1.44%), catheters were not inserted into right femoral vein in 4 (1.44%), infection in PBPC products of 3 (1.08%) and blood receiving tip of catheter was cracked in 1 (0.36%)). Our results showed that STFVCs minimized the serious side effects such as thrombophlebitis, bleeding and infection of PBPC products. The STFVCs appeared safe and effective for PBPC collection. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd

    Risk factors for adverse events during collection of peripheral blood stem cells

    No full text
    WOS: 000303551700004PubMed ID: 21727028We retrospectively reviewed peripheral blood stem cell (PBSCs) collections following 528 mobilization cycles over a 10-year period. A total of 206 (13.1%) AEs occurred in association with the 1572 procedures. One hundred and ninety-one (12.15%) of the AEs were classified as clinical AEs and 15 (0.95%) were classified as apheresis instrument related AEs. The most common clinical AE was numbness of the lips, tongue, or extremities (161 procedures, 10.2%) related to the infusion of acid citrate dextrose-A (ACD). Multivariate analysis revealed high amounts of ACD/weight (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11, p = 0.009), high numbers of procedures (OR = 1.33, p < 0.001) and female gender (OR = 2.83, p < 0.001) as being significantly associated with clinical AEs. Female gender was shown to be the most important risk factor for clinical AEs. Females who have a significantly increased risk of AEs would benefit from prophylactic calcium before and/or during PBSC collection. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

    Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma of the elderly-Experience of a single center from Turkey

    No full text
    WOS: 000324224900001PubMed ID: 23726928In the 2008 WHO lymphoma classification, 'EBV-positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the elderly is included as a new provisional entity. We aimed to evaluate the morphological, immunophenotypic, and clinical characteristics of the cases diagnosed as 'EBV-positive DLBCL of the elderly' in our center and compared them with the 'EBV-negative DLBCL' patients older than 50 years of age. EBV status was detected by Epstein-Barr early RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization analysis. By immunohistochemistry, a panel of antibodies for CD10, Bcl-2, Bcl-6, IRF4/MUM1, CD30, and Ki67 was performed. Out of 149 DLBCL patients older than 50 years, without any known history of immunodeficiency or prior lymphoma, eight patients who fulfill the criteria were re-evaluated. Five patients were male and three were female, with a median age of 67.6 years. Four patients presented with nodal involvement; others presented with bone and soft tissue, bone marrow, and spleen infiltrations. Five cases revealed predominantly monomorphic morphology, one also contained focal areas consistent with polymorphous subtype; and three patients revealed a polymorphous infiltrate. When classified according to 'Hans criteria', five were non-GCB, and three were of the GCB cell phenotype. All cases with polymorphous morphology were revealed to be of the non-GCB cell phenotype, and all expressed IRF4/MUM1. Two patients died with disease, four patients are alive and in complete remission following R-CHOP therapy, and two patients have just recently been diagnosed. When compared with the EBV-negative group, there are no reliable morphological and immunohistochemical features indicating EBV positivity. Therefore, EBER in situ hybridization analysis is necessary to identify 'EBV-positive DLBCL of the elderly'. Further studies are needed to fully understand the details of this disease, which can lead to new treatment modalities. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved

    Factors influencing engraftment in autologous peripheral hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (PBSCT)

    No full text
    WOS: 000245704500005PubMed ID: 17292672Autologous peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (PBSCT) is a therapeutic option which can be used in various hematological neoplastic disorders; and it can prolong disease free survival and total survival and at times it may be curative. In this study, we investigated variables influencing PBSCT in 91 patients who had undergone PBSCT between 1998 and 2002 in our center, retrospectively. PBSC collection was performed after mobilization with G-CSF or chemotherapy plus growth factor. Only high dose chemotherapy was used for conditioning regimes. The median number of CD34+ was 11.5 x 10(6)/kg. Posttransplant neutrophil engraftment (> 500/mu L) was requiring a median of 10 days, it was 13 days for platelet engraftment (> 20,000/mu L). For neutrophil and platelet engraftment, we investigated; sex, age, diagnosis and CD34+ cells, the time interval between diagnosis and transplantation, number of apheresis, conditioning regime, growth factor initiation day as independent variables. In univariate analysis CD34+ cell number (> 10 x 10(6)/kg), time interval more than one year between diagnosis and transplantation and BEAM conditioning was found to be significant for neutrophil engraftment. But in multivariate analysis none of them was found to be significant. For platelet engraftment in univariate analysis CD34+ cell number (> 7 x 10(6)/kg), primary diagnosis of multiple myeloma initiation day of growth factor (> 2 day) was found to be significant. In multivariate analyses only CD34+ cell count was found to be significant (p = 0.005). In conclusion, as in previous studies we found that the only predictor of engraftment kinetics was CD34+ cell count. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd
    corecore