15 research outputs found

    Membrane display and functional analysis of juxtacrine ligand-receptor signaling

    No full text
    We developed a strategy for identifying modulators of juxtacrine signaling, triggered by a cell-surface ligand displayed on synthetic lipid bilayers, via cognate receptors on apposed cells. Using readouts for receptor lateral transport and intracellular signaling, we screened a small interfering RNA (siRNA) library and identified specific receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that directly or indirectly modulate apoptosis signaling by a model death ligand through its cognate death receptors. This approach may be broadly useful for studying juxtacrine cell–cell signaling systems

    Opposing unfolded-protein-response signals converge on death receptor 5 to control apoptosis

    No full text
    Protein folding by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is physiologically critical; its disruption causes ER stress and augments disease. ER stress activates the unfolded protein response (UPR) to restore homeostasis. If stress persists, the UPR induces apoptotic cell death, but the mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we report that unmitigated ER stress promoted apoptosis through cell-autonomous, UPR-controlled activation of death receptor 5 (DR5). ER stressors induced DR5 transcription via the UPR mediator CHOP; however, the UPR sensor IRE1α transiently catalyzed DR5 mRNA decay, which allowed time for adaptation. Persistent ER stress built up intracellular DR5 protein, driving ligand-independent DR5 activation and apoptosis engagement via caspase-8. Thus, DR5 integrates opposing UPR signals to couple ER stress and apoptotic cell fate

    Decoding non-canonical mRNA decay by the endoplasmic-reticulum stress sensor IRE1α.

    No full text
    Inositol requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) mitigates endoplasmic-reticulum (ER) stress by orchestrating the unfolded-protein response (UPR). IRE1 spans the ER membrane, and signals through a cytosolic kinase-endoribonuclease module. The endoribonuclease generates the transcription factor XBP1s by intron excision between similar RNA stem-loop endomotifs, and depletes select cellular mRNAs through regulated IRE1-dependent decay (RIDD). Paradoxically, in mammals RIDD seems to target only mRNAs with XBP1-like endomotifs, while in flies RIDD exhibits little sequence restriction. By comparing nascent and total IRE1α-controlled mRNAs in human cells, we identify not only canonical endomotif-containing RIDD substrates, but also targets without such motifs-degraded by a process we coin RIDDLE, for RIDD lacking endomotif. IRE1α displays two basic endoribonuclease modalities: highly specific, endomotif-directed cleavage, minimally requiring dimers; and more promiscuous, endomotif-independent processing, requiring phospho-oligomers. An oligomer-deficient IRE1α mutant fails to support RIDDLE in vitro and in cells. Our results advance current mechanistic understanding of the UPR
    corecore