Transhiatal esophagectomy in the profoundly obese: implications and experience.

BACKGROUND: Historically, obesity contraindicated an abdominal approach to the esophagogastric junction. The technique of transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) evolved without specific regard to body habitus. The dramatic increase in obese patients requiring an esophagectomy for complications of reflux disease prompted this evaluation of the impact of obesity on the outcomes of esophagectomy to determine whether profound obesity should contraindicate the transhiatal approach. METHODS: We used our Esophagectomy Database to identify 133 profoundly obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > or = 35 kg/m2) from among 2176 undergoing a THE from 1977 to 2006. This group was matched to a randomly selected, non-obese (BMI, 18.5 to 30 kg/m2) control population of 133 patients. Intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term follow-up results were compared retrospectively. RESULTS: Profoundly obese patients had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss (mean, 492.2 mL versus 361.8 mL, p = 0.001), need for partial sternotomy (18 versus 3, p = 0.001), and frequency of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (6 versus 0, p = 0.04). The two groups did not differ significantly in the occurrence of chylothorax, wound infection, or dehiscence rate; length of hospital stay or need for intensive care unit stay; or hospital or operative mortality. Follow-up results for dysphagia, dumping, regurgitation, and overall functional score were also comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate instrumentation, transhiatal esophagectomy in obese patients has similar morbidity and outcomes as in non-obese patients. Obesity, even when profound, does not contraindicate a transhiatal esophagectomy.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57503/6/Scipione 2007.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57503/5/Benign BMI Control.txthttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57503/4/Benign BMI CS07.txthttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57503/3/CA BMI Control no pt id.txthttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57503/2/CA BMI 35 CS.tx

In-parallel attachment of a low-resistance compliant thoracic artificial lung under rest and simulated exercise.

<p>BACKGROUND: Previous thoracic artificial lungs (TALs) had blood flow impedance greater than that of the natural lungs, which could cause abnormal pulmonary hemodynamics. New compliant TALs (cTALs), however, have an impedance lower than that of the natural lung.</p> <p>METHODS: In this study, a cTAL of new design was attached between the pulmonary artery (PA) and the left atrium (LA) in 5 sheep (60.2 ± 1.9 kg). A distal PA band was placed to control the percentage of cardiac output (CO) routed to the cTAL. Rest and exercise conditions were simulated using a continuous dobutamine infusion of 0 and 5 μg/kg/min, respectively. At each dose, a hemodynamic data set was acquired at baseline (no flow to the cTAL), and 60%, 75%, and 90% of CO was shunted to the cTAL.</p> <p>RESULTS: Device resistance did not vary with blood flow rate, averaging 0.51 ± 0.03 mm Hg/(L/min). Under all conditions, CO was not significantly different from baseline. Pulmonary system impedance increased above baseline only with 5 μg/kg/min of dobutamine and 90% of CO diverted to the cTAL.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated minimal changes in pulmonary hemodynamics during PA-LA cTAL attachment for high device flows under rest and exercise conditions.</p

Use of a low-resistance compliant thoracic artificial lung in the pulmonary artery to pulmonary artery configuration.

<p>BACKGROUND: Thoracic artificial lungs have been proposed as a bridge to transplant in patients with end-stage lung disease. Systemic embolic complications can occur after thoracic artificial lung attachment in the pulmonary artery to left atrium configuration. Therefore, we evaluated the function of a compliant thoracic artificial lung attached via the proximal pulmonary artery to distal main pulmonary artery configuration.</p> <p>METHODS: The compliant thoracic artificial lung was attached to 5 sheep (63 ± 0.9 kg) in the proximal pulmonary artery to distal main pulmonary artery configuration. Device function and animal hemodynamics were assessed at baseline and with approximately 60%, 75%, and 90% of cardiac output diverted to the compliant thoracic artificial lung. At each condition, dobutamine (0 and 5 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1)) was used to simulate rest and exercise conditions.</p> <p>RESULTS: At rest, cardiac output decreased from 6.20 ± 0.53 L/min at baseline to 5.40 ± 0.43, 4.66 ± 0.31, and 4.05 ± 0.27 L/min with 60%, 75%, and 90% of cardiac output to the compliant thoracic artificial lung, respectively (P < .01 for each flow diversion vs baseline). During exercise, cardiac output decreased from 7.85 ± 0.70 L/min at baseline to 7.46 ± 0.55, 6.93 ± 0.51, and 5.96 ± 0.44 L/min (P = .82, P = .19, and P < .01 with respect to baseline) with 60%, 75%, and 90% of cardiac output to the compliant thoracic artificial lung, respectively. The artificial lung resistance averaged 0.46 ± 0.02 and did not vary significantly with blood flow rate.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Use of a compliant thoracic artificial lung may be feasible in the proximal pulmonary artery to distal main pulmonary artery setting if its blood flow is held at less than 75% of cardiac output. To ensure a decrease in cardiac output of less than 10%, a blood flow rate less than 60% of cardiac output is advised.</p