Seizures after Ischemic Stroke: A Matched Multicenter Study

Accidente cerebrovascular isquémico; Tratamiento de reperfusión; Factores de riesgoIschemic Stroke; Reperfusion treatment; Risk factorsAccident cerebrovascular isquèmic; Tractament de reperfusió; Factor de riscObjective The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for acute symptomatic seizures and post-stroke epilepsy after acute ischemic stroke and evaluate the effects of reperfusion treatment. Methods We assessed the risk factors for post-stroke seizures using logistic or Cox regression in a multicenter study, including adults from 8 European referral centers with neuroimaging-confirmed ischemic stroke. We compared the risk of post-stroke seizures between participants with or without reperfusion treatment following propensity score matching to reduce confounding due to treatment selection. Results In the overall cohort of 4,229 participants (mean age 71 years, 57% men), a higher risk of acute symptomatic seizures was observed in those with more severe strokes, infarcts located in the posterior cerebral artery territory, and strokes caused by large-artery atherosclerosis. Strokes caused by small-vessel occlusion carried a small risk of acute symptomatic seizures. 6% developed post-stroke epilepsy. Risk factors for post-stroke epilepsy were acute symptomatic seizures, more severe strokes, infarcts involving the cerebral cortex, and strokes caused by large-artery atherosclerosis. Electroencephalography findings within 7 days of stroke onset were not independently associated with the risk of post-stroke epilepsy. There was no association between reperfusion treatments in general or only intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy with the time to post-stroke epilepsy or the risk of acute symptomatic seizures. Interpretation Post-stroke seizures are related to stroke severity, etiology, and location, whereas an early electroencephalogram was not predictive of epilepsy. We did not find an association of reperfusion treatment with risks of acute symptomatic seizures or post-stroke epilepsy

Serum circulating sirtuin 6 as a novel predictor of mortality after acute ischemic stroke

In a murine model of acute ischemic stroke, SIRT6 knockdown resulted in larger cerebral infarct size, worse neurological outcome, and higher mortality, indicating a possible neuro-protective role of SIRT6. In this study, we aimed at evaluating the prognostic value of serum SIRT6 levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Serum levels of SIRT6, collected within 72 h from symptom-onset, were measured in 317 consecutively enrolled AIS patients from the COSMOS cohort. The primary endpoint of this analysis was 90-day mortality. The independent prognostic value of SIRT6 was assessed with multivariate logistic and Cox proportional regression models. 35 patients (11%) deceased within 90-day follow-up. After adjustment for established risk factors (age, NIHSS, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and C reactive protein), SIRT6 levels were negatively associated with mortality. The optimal cut-off for survival was 634 pg/mL. Patients with SIRT6 levels below this threshold had a higher risk of death in multivariable Cox regression. In this pilot study, SIRT6 levels were significantly associated with 90-day mortality after AIS; these results build on previous molecular and causal observations made in animal models. Should this association be confirmed, SIRT6 could be a potential prognostic predictor and therapeutic target in AIS

Association of Mortality and Risk of Epilepsy With Type of Acute Symptomatic Seizure After Ischemic Stroke and an Updated Prognostic Model

IMPORTANCE: Acute symptomatic seizures occurring within 7 days after ischemic stroke may be associated with an increased mortality and risk of epilepsy. It is unknown whether the type of acute symptomatic seizure influences this risk. OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality and risk of epilepsy following different types of acute symptomatic seizures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed data acquired from 2002 to 2019 from 9 tertiary referral centers. The derivation cohort included adults from 7 cohorts and 2 case-control studies with neuroimaging-confirmed ischemic stroke and without a history of seizures. Replication in 3 separate cohorts included adults with acute symptomatic status epilepticus after neuroimaging-confirmed ischemic stroke. The final data analysis was performed in July 2022. EXPOSURES: Type of acute symptomatic seizure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: All-cause mortality and epilepsy (at least 1 unprovoked seizure presenting >7 days after stroke). RESULTS: A total of 4552 adults were included in the derivation cohort (2547 male participants [56%]; 2005 female [44%]; median age, 73 years [IQR, 62-81]). Acute symptomatic seizures occurred in 226 individuals (5%), of whom 8 (0.2%) presented with status epilepticus. In patients with acute symptomatic status epilepticus, 10-year mortality was 79% compared with 30% in those with short acute symptomatic seizures and 11% in those without seizures. The 10-year risk of epilepsy in stroke survivors with acute symptomatic status epilepticus was 81%, compared with 40% in survivors with short acute symptomatic seizures and 13% in survivors without seizures. In a replication cohort of 39 individuals with acute symptomatic status epilepticus after ischemic stroke (24 female; median age, 78 years), the 10-year risk of mortality and epilepsy was 76% and 88%, respectively. We updated a previously described prognostic model (SeLECT 2.0) with the type of acute symptomatic seizures as a covariate. SeLECT 2.0 successfully captured cases at high risk of poststroke epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, individuals with stroke and acute symptomatic seizures presenting as status epilepticus had a higher mortality and risk of epilepsy compared with those with short acute symptomatic seizures or no seizures. The SeLECT 2.0 prognostic model adequately reflected the risk of epilepsy in high-risk cases and may inform decisions on the continuation of antiseizure medication treatment and the methods and frequency of follow-up

Trends in Literature on Cerebral Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION Ever since the beginning of cerebral bypass surgery, the role of the bypass has been debated and indications have changed over the last 5 decades. This systematic literature research analysed all clinical studies on cerebral bypass that have been published from January 1959 to January 2020 for their year of publication, country of origin, citation index, role of and indication for bypass, bypass technique, revascularized territory, flow capacity, and title (for word cloud analysis per decade). METHODS A systematic literature research was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. All studies that have been published until January 1, 2020, were included. RESULTS Of 6,013 identified studies, 2,585 were included in the analysis. Of these, n = 1,734 (67%) studies addressed flow-augmentation bypass and n = 701 (27%) addressed flow-preservation bypass. The most common indication reported for flow augmentation is moyamoya (n = 877, 51%), followed by atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease (n = 753, 43%). For flow preservation, the most common indication is studies reporting on cerebral aneurysm surgery (n = 659, 94%). The increasing popularity of reporting on these bypass operations almost came to an end with the FDA approval of flow diverters for aneurysm treatment in 2011. Japan is the country with the most bypass studies (cumulatively published 933 articles), followed by the USA (630 articles) and China (232 articles). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Clinical studies on cerebral bypass surgery have become increasingly popular in the past decades. Since the introduction of moyamoya as a distinct pathologic entity, Asian countries in particular have a very active community regarding this disease, with an increasing number of articles published every year. Studies on bypass for chronic steno-occlusive disease peaked in the 1980s but have remained the main focus of bypass research, particularly in many European departments. The number of reports published on these bypass operations significantly decreased after the FDA approval of flow diverters for aneurysm treatment in 2011

SAA (Serum Amyloid A): A Novel Predictor of Stroke-Associated Infections

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate and independently validate SAA (serum amyloid A)-a recently discovered blood biomarker-to predict poststroke infections. METHODS The derivation cohort (A) was composed of 283 acute ischemic stroke patients and the independent validation cohort (B), of 367 patients. The primary outcome measure was any stroke-associated infection, defined by the criteria of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, occurring during hospitalization. To determine the association of SAA levels on admission with the development of infections, logistic regression models were calculated. The discriminatory ability of SAA was assessed, by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS After adjusting for all predictors that were significantly associated with any infection in the univariate analysis, SAA remained an independent predictor in study A (adjusted odds ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.16-1.79]; P=0.001) and in study B (adjusted odds ratio, 1.52 [1.05-2.22]; P=0.028). Adding SAA to the best regression model without the biomarker, the discriminatory accuracy improved from 0.76 (0.69-0.83) to 0.79 (0.72-0.86; P<0.001; likelihood ratio test) in study A. These results were externally validated in study B with an improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, from 0.75 (0.70-0.81) to 0.76 (0.71-0.82; P<0.038). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with ischemic stroke, blood SAA measured on admission is a novel independent predictor of infection after stroke. SAA improved the discrimination between patients who developed an infection compared with those who did not in both derivation and validation cohorts. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00390962

A novel biomarker panel index improves risk stratification after ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND: We investigated 92 blood biomarkers implicated in the pathophysiological pathways of ischemic injury, inflammation, hemostasis, and regulation of vascular resistance to predict post-stroke mortality. AIM: Based on the most promising markers, we aimed to create a novel Biomarker Panel Index (BPI) for risk stratification. METHODS: In this prospective study, we measured 92 biomarkers in 320 stroke patients. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days. We estimated the association of each biomarker using logistic regression adjusting for multiple testing. The most significant 16 biomarkers were used to create the BPI. We fitted regression models to estimate the association and the discriminatory accuracy of the BPI with mortality and stroke etiology. RESULTS: Adjusted for demographic and vascular covariates, the BPI remained independently associated with mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-2.18) and cardioembolic stroke etiology (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.10-1.74), and improved the discriminatory accuracy to predict mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.96) and cardioembolic stroke etiology (AUC 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64-0.77) as compared to the best clinical prediction models alone (AUC 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94 and AUC 0.66, 95% CI: 0.60-0.73, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a novel BPI improving risk stratification for mortality after ischemic stroke beyond established demographic and vascular risk factors. Furthermore, the BPI is associated with underlying cardioembolic stroke etiology. These results need external validation

A novel biomarker panel index improves risk stratification after ischemic stroke.

Background We investigated 92 blood biomarkers implicated in the pathophysiological pathways of ischemic injury, inflammation, hemostasis, and regulation of vascular resistance to predict post-stroke mortality. Aim Based on the most promising markers, we aimed to create a novel Biomarker Panel Index (BPI) for risk stratification. Methods In this prospective study, we measured 92 biomarkers in 320 stroke patients. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days. We estimated the association of each biomarker using logistic regression adjusting for multiple testing. The most significant 16 biomarkers were used to create the BPI. We fitted regression models to estimate the association and the discriminatory accuracy of the BPI with mortality and stroke etiology. Results Adjusted for demographic and vascular covariates, the BPI remained independently associated with mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-2.18) and cardioembolic stroke etiology (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.10-1.74), and improved the discriminatory accuracy to predict mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.96) and cardioembolic stroke etiology (AUC 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64-0.77) as compared to the best clinical prediction models alone (AUC 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94 and AUC 0.66, 95% CI: 0.60-0.73, respectively). Conclusions We identified a novel BPI improving risk stratification for mortality after ischemic stroke beyond established demographic and vascular risk factors. Furthermore, the BPI is associated with underlying cardioembolic stroke etiology. These results need external validation

Association of Mortality and Risk of Epilepsy With Type of Acute Symptomatic Seizure After Ischemic Stroke and an Updated Prognostic Model

Importance: Acute symptomatic seizures occurring within 7 days after ischemic stroke may be associated with an increased mortality and risk of epilepsy. It is unknown whether the type of acute symptomatic seizure influences this risk. Objective: To compare mortality and risk of epilepsy following different types of acute symptomatic seizures.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study analyzed data acquired from 2002 to 2019 from 9 tertiary referral centers. The derivation cohort included adults from 7 cohorts and 2 case-control studies with neuroimaging-confirmed ischemic stroke and without a history of seizures. Replication in 3 separate cohorts included adults with acute symptomatic status epilepticus after neuroimaging-confirmed ischemic stroke. The final data analysis was performed in July 2022. Exposures: Type of acute symptomatic seizure.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAll-cause mortality and epilepsy (at least 1 unprovoked seizure presenting &amp;gt;7 days after stroke). Results: A total of 4552 adults were included in the derivation cohort (2547 male participants [56%]; 2005 female [44%]; median age, 73 years [IQR, 62-81]). Acute symptomatic seizures occurred in 226 individuals (5%), of whom 8 (0.2%) presented with status epilepticus. In patients with acute symptomatic status epilepticus, 10-year mortality was 79% compared with 30% in those with short acute symptomatic seizures and 11% in those without seizures. The 10-year risk of epilepsy in stroke survivors with acute symptomatic status epilepticus was 81%, compared with 40% in survivors with short acute symptomatic seizures and 13% in survivors without seizures. In a replication cohort of 39 individuals with acute symptomatic status epilepticus after ischemic stroke (24 female; median age, 78 years), the 10-year risk of mortality and epilepsy was 76% and 88%, respectively. We updated a previously described prognostic model (SeLECT 2.0) with the type of acute symptomatic seizures as a covariate. SeLECT 2.0 successfully captured cases at high risk of poststroke epilepsy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, individuals with stroke and acute symptomatic seizures presenting as status epilepticus had a higher mortality and risk of epilepsy compared with those with short acute symptomatic seizures or no seizures. The SeLECT 2.0 prognostic model adequately reflected the risk of epilepsy in high-risk cases and may inform decisions on the continuation of antiseizure medication treatment and the methods and frequency of follow-up