27 research outputs found

    Gothic visions of classical architecture in Hablot Knight Browne’s “dark” illustrations for the novels of Charles Dickens

    Get PDF
    In the early gothic literature of the eighteenth century danger lurked in the darkness beneath the pointed arches of gothic buildings. During the nineteenth century there was a progressive, although never complete, dislocation of gothic literary readings from gothic architecture. This article explores a phase in that development through discussion of a series of ‘dark’ illustrations produced by Hablot Knight Browne to illustrate novels by Charles Dickens. These show the way in which the rounded arches of neo-classical architecture were depicted in the mid-nineteenth century as locales of oppression and obscurity. Such depictions acted, in an age of political and moral reform, to critique the values of the system of power and authority that such architecture represented

    Review: Nineteenth-Century British Travelers in the New World, Ed. Christine Devine (UK: Ashgate, 2013)

    No full text
    A review of Christine DeVine, ed., Nineteenth-Century British Travelers in the New World (UK: Ashgate, 2013), 334 pp., ÂŁ60 hardcover

    The Atlantic between them: Dickens, Melville, and nationality in the transatlantic market

    No full text

    Keighren, Innes M., Charles W.J. Withers, Bill Bell. Travels into Print: Exploration, Writing, and publishing with John Murray, 1773-1859 (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015)

    Get PDF
    A review of Innes M. Keighren, Charles W.J. Withers, Bill Bell's Travels into Print: Exploration, Writing, and publishing with John Murray, 1773-1859. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015. 392 pp. $45

    'Literary adventurers': editorship, non-fiction authorship and anonymity

    No full text
    The professional literary gentleman of the nineteenth century was expected to publically dissociate himself as much as possible from writing for money, which was all too readily associated with hacks and penny-a-liners, despite earning a living through literary production. Indeed, while John Forster made sure the contracts he negotiated for Dickens were increasingly favourable for the novelist, Forster also felt that his friend should behave, where money was concerned, with the modesty and restraint befitting a professional gentleman (Forster 641). The unattributed article “Literary adventurers,” published on the 10th of October, 1863, in All the Year Round, is a surprising departure from this paradoxical Victorian coyness about remuneration. It proudly claims that literature has become a profitable business in the nineteenth century. Presenting the view that authorship becomes a legitimate profession only when it is able to generate income, the article effectively equates money with respectability. Moreover, this respectability – or profitability – of authorship supposedly stems entirely from the periodical press. At the time “Literary Adventurers” appeared, the second series of Dickens’s The Uncommercial Traveller was also in publication in All the Year Round. In these “uncommercial” sketches, the traveller supposedly “never gets any commission” and purports to “know nothing about prices” (Dickens 1). This satire of the traditional, leisurely authorship, devoid of monetary motives obviously fits in well with the image of the author-craftsman. The untenable position of the author as an idle lounger sustaining himself (quite admirably) on undisclosed means is highlighted in The Uncommercial Traveller, and concretized by description of the miserable position of the eighteenth-century patronage-dependent author in “Literary Adventurers.” The article argues that the tendency of the nineteenth-century periodical press to pay its authors not only raises up authorship as a profession, but also the quality of literary production. Interestingly, for this improved quality to become possible, the article claims that the “duties” of an author as “a member of the industrial world” (AtYR X.155) have had to adapt. And yet, while it derides the notion that authors should be primarily concerned with contributing to the “abstract interests of the commonwealth of letters” (AtYR X.154), the article does not explicitly state its stance on what an author’s writings should achieve. The only information it provides on the subject is ex negativo. In this paper, I seek to explore the article’s remarkable - yet unspoken – positioning of authors within an explicitly market-driven literary field
    corecore