Monovision LASIK in emmetropic presbyopic patients.

BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and patient satisfaction of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) monovision correction in presbyopic emmetropic patients.MethodsA retrospective review of 294 patients who underwent LASIK for monovision was conducted. All patients had preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity in each eye of 20/25 or better in both eyes and underwent primary LASIK treatment in one eye with a near target; 82 patients underwent surgery in the distant eye for hypermetropia. Patients completed a patient-reported-outcome questionnaire at their one-month postoperative visit. Analysis was performed on a per patient basis with a logistic regression model.ResultsPatients achieved a postoperative mean spherical equivalent of -0.05 diopters (D) in the distant eye and -1.92 D in the near eye. Prior to surgery, 64.7% (n=178) of patients reported they were satisfied or very satisfied with their vision; postoperatively, this increased to 85.4% (n=251). The greatest predictor of dissatisfaction after surgery was severe patient-reported visual phenomena (glare, halos, starbursts, ghosting) (odds ratio 1.18, P=0.001).ConclusionsLASIK monovision for presbyopic patients with low refractive error and good preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity is both safe and effective with high patient satisfaction. Patients who were dissatisfied in the postoperative period tended to be those with postoperative visual symptoms

Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach.

Purpose:The aim of this study was to compare the quality of consent process in refractive surgery between patients who had a preoperative consent discussion with the surgeon using a telemedicine approach and those who had a face-to-face discussion. Methods:Patients treated between January and December 2017 (8,184 laser vision correction [LVC] and 3,754 refractive lens exchange [RLE] patients) that attended day 1 and 1-month postoperative visit were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative consent preparation included a consultation with an optometrist, observation of an educational video, and written information. Patients then selected either a face-to-face appointment with their surgeon (in-clinic group) or a telemedicine appointment (remote group) for their consent discussion, according to their preference. Patient experience questionnaire and clinical data were included in a multivariate model to explore factors associated with consent quality. Results:Prior to surgery, 80.1% of LVC and 47.9% of RLE patients selected remote consent. Of all LVC patients, 97.5% of in-clinic and 98.3% of remote patients responded that they were adequately consented for surgery (P=0.04). Similar percentages in the RLE group were 97.6% for in-clinic and 97.9% for remote patients (P=0.47). In a multivariate model, the major predictor of patient's satisfaction with the consent process was postoperative satisfaction with visual acuity, responsible for 80.4% of variance explained by the model. Other significant contributors were postoperative visual phenomena and dry eyes, difficulty with night driving, close-up and distance vision, postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity, change in corrected distance visual acuity, and satisfaction with the surgeon's approach. The type of consent (remote or in-clinic) had no impact on patient's perception of consent quality in the regression model. Conclusion:The majority of patients opted for telemedicine-assisted consent. Those who chose it were equally satisfied as those who had a face-to-face meeting with their surgeon. Dissatisfaction with surgical outcome was the major factor affecting patient's perception of consent quality, regardless of the method of their consent

Rifabutin corneal deposits localized to the deep stroma using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Purpose:To demonstrate that rifabutin-related corneal deposits are localized to the deep stroma using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) and confocal microscopy. Observations:A 55-year-old male with a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and disseminated mycobacterium avium complex on rifabutin treatment for 3 years presented with bilateral corneal deposits. Confocal microscopy and anterior segment OCT confirm that rifabutin-related corneal deposits are located in the deep stroma, rather than in the endothelium. Conclusions:And Importance: Rifabutin deposits localize to the deep corneal stroma, and can be seen with both confocal microscopy and anterior segment OCT. Anterior segment OCT is a widely available and easily used diagnostic tool, and can provide utility in the diagnosis of corneal deposits

Multifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Comparison of Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Trials.

PurposeTo review and compare the results of unpublished premarket approval studies for recent multifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses.MethodsLenses without previously published pre-market approval trials were identified and clinical and patient-reported outcomes were reviewed and compared.ResultsLenses included the DFT/DAT (Acrysof Vivity) EDOF lens, the TFNT/TFAT (PanOptix) trifocal lens, and the SV25T (ReStor ActiveFocus) lens (all from Alcon Laboratories, Inc), as well as the ZXR/ZXT (Tecnis Symfony and Symfony Toric), the ZLB00 (Tecnis Multifocal +3.25), and the ZKB00 (Tecnis Multifocal +2.75, all Tecnis lenses from Johnson & Johnson Vision). All lenses produced equivalent distance vision and superior intermediate and near vision compared to monofocal controls. Patient-reported difficulty with glare, halos, and starbursts was higher in the multifocal and EDOF lens cohort compared to monofocal controls. Spectacle independence was higher in the multifocal and EDOF cohort with the exception of the SV25T (ActiveFocus) lens, which was not significantly different than the control lens.ConclusionsClinical trial data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration premarket approval studies supports multifocal and EDOF lenses as an effective treatment for aphakia and presbyopia. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):98-104.]

Multifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Comparison of Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Trials.

PurposeTo review and compare the results of unpublished premarket approval studies for recent multifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses.MethodsLenses without previously published pre-market approval trials were identified and clinical and patient-reported outcomes were reviewed and compared.ResultsLenses included the DFT/DAT (Acrysof Vivity) EDOF lens, the TFNT/TFAT (PanOptix) trifocal lens, and the SV25T (ReStor ActiveFocus) lens (all from Alcon Laboratories, Inc), as well as the ZXR/ZXT (Tecnis Symfony and Symfony Toric), the ZLB00 (Tecnis Multifocal +3.25), and the ZKB00 (Tecnis Multifocal +2.75, all Tecnis lenses from Johnson & Johnson Vision). All lenses produced equivalent distance vision and superior intermediate and near vision compared to monofocal controls. Patient-reported difficulty with glare, halos, and starbursts was higher in the multifocal and EDOF lens cohort compared to monofocal controls. Spectacle independence was higher in the multifocal and EDOF cohort with the exception of the SV25T (ActiveFocus) lens, which was not significantly different than the control lens.ConclusionsClinical trial data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration premarket approval studies supports multifocal and EDOF lenses as an effective treatment for aphakia and presbyopia. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):98-104.]