The use of perfusion CT for the evaluation of therapy combining AZD2171 with gefitinib in cancer patients

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion CT (CTP) in evaluating the hemodynamic response of tumors in the chest and abdomen treated with a combination of AZD2171 and gefitinib. Thirteen patients were examined just before and every 4-6 weeks after starting therapy. Following intravenous injection of a contrast agent, dynamic image acquisition was obtained at the level of a selected tumor location. To calculate perfusion, the maximum-slope method was used. Pre-treatment average perfusion for extra-hepatic masses was 84 ml/min/100 g, for liver masses arterial perfusion was 25 ml/min/100 g, and a portal perfusion of 30 ml/min/100 g was found. After the administration of AZD2171 and gefitinib, in extra-hepatic masses an initial decrease in perfusion of 18% was followed by a plateau and in liver masses an initial decrease of 39% within the lesions and of 36% within a rim region surrounding the lesions was followed by a tendency to recovery of hepatic artery flow. In conclusion, CTP is feasible in showing changes of perfusion induced by anti-angiogenic therapy

Assessment of patency of the internal jugular vein following neck dissection and microvascular flap reconstruction by power Doppler ultrasound

The objective of this study was to assess patency of the internal jugular vein following modified radical or selective neck dissection and microvascular flap reconstruction by power Doppler ultrasound and its impact on free flap survival. In 23 patients who underwent selective or modified radical neck dissection and microvascular flap reconstruction the patency of the internal jugular vein was examined by power Doppler ultrasound on the first post-operative day and after follow-up of at least four months. On the first post-operative day in one patient partial thrombosis was found, while in the other 22 patients the internal jugular vein was normal patent. During follow-up in 17 (74 per cent) patients a normal patent internal jugular vein was found, while partial and complete thrombosis were found in three (13 per cent) patients each. On the first post-operative day 22 of the 23 (96 per cent) free flap veins were visualized. There was no free flap loss during follow-up. Power Doppler ultrasound is a valuable diagnostic technique for determination of internal jugular vein patency and may be useful as screening method or in case of clinical suspicion of thrombosis to determine internal jugular vein patency. Late internal jugular vein thrombosis may probably not effect free flap survival due to neovascularization

Accurate perioperative flow measurement of the portal vein and hepatic and renal artery: A role for preoperative MRI?

AbstractBackgroundQuantification of abdominal blood flow is essential for a variety of gastrointestinal and hepatic topics such as liver transplantation or metabolic flux measurement, but those need to be performed during surgery. It is not clear whether Duplex Doppler Ultrasound during surgery or MRI before surgery is the tool to choose.ObjectiveTo examine whether preoperative evaluation of abdominal blood flow using MRI could prove to be a useful and reliable alternative for the perioperative sonographic approach.MethodsIn this study portal and renal venous flow and hepatic arterial flow were sequentially quantified by preoperative MRI, preoperative and perioperative Duplex Doppler Ultrasound (DDUS). 55 Patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were studied and methods and settings were compared. Additionally, average patient population values were compared.ResultsMean (±SD) plasmaflow measured by perioperative DDUS, preoperative DDUS and MRI, respectively was 433±200/423±162/507±96ml/min (portal vein); 96±70/74±41/108±91ml/min (hepatic artery); 248±139/201±118/219±69ml/min (renal vein). No differences between the different settings of DDUS measurement were detected. Equality of mean was observed for all measurements. Bland Altman Plots showed widespread margins. Hepatic arterial flow measurements correlated with each other, but portal and renal venous flow correlations were absent.ConclusionsSurgery and method (DDUS vs. MRI) do not affect mean flow values. Individual comparison is restricted due to wide range in measurements.Since MRI proves to be more reliable with respect to inter-observer variability, we recommend using mean MRI results in experimental setups