Does the polydimethylsiloxane urethral injection (Macroplastique®) improve sexual function in women, in fertile age, affected by stress urinary incontinence?

Background and Objectives: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) negatively affects women's quality of life, including sexual function. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique(R)) on sexual function in women of fertile age affected by SUI. Materials and Methods: Single-center prospective study. Sexually active women of fertile age with symptoms of pure SUI, which were urodynamically proven, were submitted to intraurethral Macroplastique(R) injection. At 6-months follow-up, their sexual function was evaluated with Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), while the SUI cure rate was objectively assessed through a negative stress test and subjectively by a Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score < 3. The difference of coital incontinence prevalence was assessed between the baseline and the 6-month follow-up. Peri- and postoperative complications of Macroplastique(R) injection were recorded and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: Twenty-one women fulfilled inclusion criteria and were submitted to Macroplastique(R) procedure. The concerning sexual function, desire, satisfaction, and overall FSFI score significantly improved. Since other domains were less impaired at the baseline, we could not assess significant improvement for all of them. We observed a complete regression of coital incontinence (0/21, 0%) in comparison with the baseline (5/21, 23.8%; p = 0.04). The objective SUI cure rate was 76% (16/21), while the subjective SUI cure rate was 80.9% (17/21). One woman developed de novo overactive bladder, and two women developed postoperative voiding dysfunction (self-solved in 24 h). Conclusions: The Macroplastique(R) urethral injection was demonstrated to be safe and effective in improving sexual function in sexually active women of fertile age affected by pure SUI, urodinamically proven at 6-months follow-up

When does oasis cause de novo pelvic floor dysfunction? role of the surgeon's skills

Introduction and hypothesis: Minorly skilled gynecologists are less likely to repair obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), and this can lead to higher rate of de novo onset of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). The aim of this study was to understand the impact of surgeon skills in OASIS repair on de novo incidence of PFDs. Methods: An observational prospective cohort study performed between January 2019 and December 2020. We included 116 women with OASIS. At 6-weeks from delivery, women were divided into two groups in relation to the onset of PFDs. Characteristics were compared; categorical and continuous variables were assessed with chi-squared test and the Mann–Whitney rank-sum test respectively. Factors involved in PFDs development were analysed with explorative univariate analysis; significant (p<0.05) or approaching significance (p≤0.10) variables were included in multivariable analysis. Results: Seventy-six women (76/116; 65.5%) reported at least one PFD symptom and anal incontinence was the most prevalent (44.73%; 34/76). OASIS management by a skilled gynaecologist resulted protective for PFDs [aOR 0.33 (0.13-0.61)]. Skilled surgeon reported fewer PFDs than less skilled surgeon (4% vs 82.4%; p<0.0001). Operative delivery was more performed (32.5% vs 15.8%; p= 0.03) and severe OASIS resulted more prevalent (60% vs 17.1%; p<0.0001) among women without PDFs, even if these didn’t affect the incidence of de novo PFDs [aOR 1.03 (0.23-1.45) and 0.83 (0.13-1.45), respectively]. Conclusions: Surgeons skilled in OASIS repair resulted the only protective factor for incidence of de novo PFDs in women with OASIS at 6 weeks of follow up. Improvement of training in OASIS repair is necessary

Is urodynamic evaluation able to change and improve the management of women with idiopathic overactive bladder?

BACKGROUND: For women with overactive bladder (OAB), current guidelines recommend the use of urodynamic studies (UDS) only in complicated cases. This study aimed to investigate whether UDS can also be helpful in uncomplicated cases. Specific aims of the study were: 1) to evaluate objective benefit and subjective patient satisfaction with tailored treatment based on the UDS diagnosis compared to the outcomes of the pharmacological treatment only based on the symptoms; 2) to investigate the correlation between symptoms and UDS findings in women with uncomplicated idiopathic OAB symptoms; 3) to assess the ability of UDS to modify management decisions in these patients. METHODS: Women presenting to our clinic with a history of uncomplicated OAB symptoms for the past three months or more, and who completed the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), were considered for this study. We proposed UDS to all participants. In women who accepted UDS (group 1), management decisions were made on the basis of urodynamic findings and post-treatment evaluation was scheduled at three months. The outcomes of treatments in these patients were compared to the results in women who did not accept UDS and who received pharmacological treatment symptoms-based (group 2). Objective outcomes were based on completion of a 3-day micturition diary. Subjective outcomes were captured using the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq-SF), the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale, and a patient satisfaction scale. RESULTS: A total of 680 women were enrolled in the study; 478 underwent UDS and 202, at the contrary, declined UDS. In 53.6% of cases, UDS led to modification of the proposed management approach. At the 3-month follow-up, the overall patient satisfaction rate in group 1 and group 2 was 77% and 65.8%, respectively (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that OAB management tailored according to the UDS diagnosis results in higher subjective satisfaction if compared with a pharmacological treatment symptoms-based. Our study confirmed a lack of correlation between OAB symptoms and the urodynamically proven diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO). It also suggested that UDS can determine the underlying pathophysiology of every woman with OAB syndrome, whether complicated or uncomplicated, allowing treatment to be appropriately tailored with better results